US Military News, Reports, Data, etc.

FORBIN

Lieutenant General
Registered Member
EVERETT, Wash. (NNS) -- Sailors and guests bade farewell to Oliver Hazard Perry-class frigate USS Ingraham (FFG 61) as the ship concluded 25 years of naval service during a decommissioning ceremony on Naval Station Everett (NSE), Washington, Nov. 12.

Former Secretary of Defense Robert M. Gates joined the crew in honoring Ingraham and her many years of service by acting as the guest speaker at the ceremony.

Several former crew members, plankowners, friends and family also attended.

Ingraham's last commanding officer, Cmdr. Daniel Straub kicked off the ceremony and put into context the ship's place in the history of the Navy during her time in service.

"During 25 years of service to the nation, Ingraham has answered America's call; Ingraham has always been ready, willing and able to fulfill mission requirements," said Straub.

The decommissioning ceremony, a time-honored naval tradition, retires a ship from service through a variety of ceremonial observances, including the department heads' final reports, lowering of the ship's commissioning pennant and Sailors walking off the ship while a bugler plays "Taps." The ceremony is meant to pay respect to the ship and the Sailors who have served in her over decades of honorable service.

According to Gates, the ship has seen a long and storied career, and deserves to be honored for the part she played in history. However, Ingraham's Sailors, along with all service members, also deserve to be honored for their great courage and sacrifice, he said.

"I think its important that people understand the sacrifices involved, not just by the men and women in uniform, but by their families," said Gates. "We owe a huge debt of gratitude, all of us."

Ingraham was assigned to Destroyer Squadron (DESRON) 9. In October, the ship returned from her last deployment to the 4th Fleet in support of Operation Martillo. During this deployment, Ingraham disrupted or intercepted 11,937 kilograms of cocaine valued at more than $560 million.

"Ingraham, as a crew, has proven time and again that they care about their ship and each other," said Straub. "They are the ones who forged all of Ingraham's successes.

"All the incredible men and women who have served their country on this great warship have earned my deepest gratitude, and the gratitude of this nation," he said.

For Gates, the ceremony was a new experience, as it was the first decommissioning he has ever attended. He said he has seen many commissioning ceremonies in his day, and a decommissioning brings forth a whole different set of emotions.

"It's kind of sad, actually," said Gates. "The last time I was at a commissioning, seeing the the Sailors run on board and man the ship, it's sort of the start of the whole long service for a ship. To see everybody come off is kind of sad."

USS Ingraham was commissioned Aug. 5, 1989, at Naval Station Long Beach, California, as the last Oliver Hazard Perry-class frigate. She was the fourth ship named for Captain Duncan Nathaniel Ingraham.

"[Ingraham] has been in service for so long, and seen so many things; it's got so much history, it's huge," said Information Systems Technician 2nd Class (SW/IDW) Steven Harte, an Ingraham crew member. "It's done a great job, it deserves a retirement."

Ingraham is scheduled to be transferred for dismantlement Jan. 30.

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!


Remain now 9 on 51 Perry : USS Mc Clusky (FFG 41), USS Vandegrift (FFG 48), USS Taylor (FFG 50), USS Gary (FFG 51), USS Elrod (FFG 55), USS Simpson (FFG 56), USS Samuel B. Roberts (FFG 58), USS Kauffman (FFG 59), USS Rodney M. Davis (FFG 60).

With 4 LCS only 13 FFG for USN.
 
Last edited:

Air Force Brat

Brigadier
Super Moderator
The IOC date for the F-35A is 2017/2018 (from memory) which I think is tied to the software block release so that it is weapon enabled. In the near term, should there be any contemplated plans to roll Soviet tanks across the fields of Europe, the A-10 will be a strong deterrent. Putin seems to only recognise power, the type that is capable and available. The F-35 will be practically irrelevant until it gets to the needed software block releases no matter how strategic it might be for the future. Currently the software testing on the F-35B is 13 months behind schedule and in my view the targeted IOC for 2016 is highly questionable unless they change the hurdle of IOC.

Keeping the A-10 and packing them off to Europe in my view sends a strong message to Putin - the only type he seems to understand.

I hear you Brumby, not a good scenario in any situation, and I'm afraid that America's weakness is seen as an invitation to raise some Cane?
 

Jeff Head

General
Registered Member
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!


Remain now 9 on 51 Perry : USS Mc Clusky (FFG 41), USS Vandegrift (FFG 48), USS Taylor (FFG 50), USS Gary (FFG 51), USS Elrod (FFG 55), USS Simpson (FFG 56), USS Samuel B. Roberts (FFG 58), USS Kauffman (FFG 59), USS Rodney M. Davis (FFG 60).

With 4 LCS only 13 FFG for USN.
Like the Spruance class...these are being reitered too early IMHO. They should have gotten another 10-15 years out of them...is they had uparmed them ten years ago.

But, with the Perry's having been neutered by removing their anti-air and anti-surface missiles, and with the LCS not having the weaponry/armament sufficient to contend with peer opposition vessels, the US Navy in effect has NO frigates for any scenario that might involve combat in contested waters.

The Perry's are still effective ASW platforms, and I suppose the LCS could operate in that mode as well.

However, FFGs are inended to by much more multi-role capable and the US Navy just doesn't have any right now.

But the US Navy does have sixty-two Burke DDGs, and twenty-two Ticonderoga class cruisers. Between those 84 vessels, and the 53 SSNs (40 LA Class, 2 available Sea Wolf Class and 11 Virginia Class available) the US has enough combatants to take care of business.

It will be nice however to add 20-30 very good FFGs to that mix so that a DDG or CG does not have to fill what should be FFG patrol or escort duties.
 

Jeff Head

General
Registered Member
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!



MH-60R.jpg


Sea Waves said:
Owego NY November 13, 2014

The U.S. Navy received its 200th submarine-hunting MH-60R "Romeo" helicopter from Lockheed Martin following a patch signing with Helicopter Maritime Strike Squadron Seven-Two (HSM-72). The cornerstone of the U.S. Navy's anti-surface and anti-submarine operations, MH-60R helicopters have flown more than 250,000 hours in operation with the Fleet, providing increased surveillance and situational awareness.

"We are proud to continue supporting the U.S. Navy by delivering a multi-role aircraft with a game-changing sensor suite that shifts the advantage from the submarine to the helicopter," said Dan Spoor, vice president of Aviation and Unmanned Systems for Lockheed Martin's Mission Systems and Training business. "As surface and submarine warfare becomes increasingly complex, the MH-60R's capabilities are unmatched in identifying, locating, tracking and prosecuting these threats."

Manufactured by Sikorsky Aircraft Corp and provided with advanced mission systems and sensors by Lockheed Martin, the MH-60R employs a modular design, which refers to the ability to modify weapon systems to match specific mission requirements. The modularity gives this single platform the agility to provide greater surveillance and flexibility to the Fleet, tailored for the mission.

Aboard the MH-60R, sensor data is integrated into actionable information for the three-member crew. The mission systems compile data from onboard and offboard sensors to create an integrated picture that enhances decision-making.
Secondary missions include search and rescue, vertical replenishment, naval surface fire support, logistics support, personnel transport, medical evacuation, and very high frequency, ultra high frequency link communication relay.

The U.S. Navy is projected to acquire 291 MH-60R helicopters. The Lockheed Martin-Sikorsky team has also delivered five of 24 aircraft to the Royal Australian Navy and began production for the Royal Danish Navy, which will acquire nine aircraft.

That's right...200, as in two hundred and growing. Originally they were known as the LAMPS Mark III Block II. But the designation was changed to the MH-60R, "Romeo."

The US Navy is also receiving the MH-60S in similar numbers. The MH-60S, unlike the "Romeo," is not based on the original S-70B/SH-60B platform with its forward-mounted twin tail-gear and single starboard sliding cabin door. Instead, the "S" is a hybrid, using the main fuselage of the S-70A/UH-60, with large sliding doors on both sides of the cabin and a single aft-mounted tail wheel; and the engines, drivetrain and rotors of the S-70B/SH-60

The "Romeo" focuses predominantly on ASW, ASuW, and patrol, while the "S" focuses on a myriad of missions including vertical replenishment, medical evacuation, combat search and rescue, anti-surface warfare, maritime interdiction, intelligence, surveillance and reconnaissance, and special warfare support.
 
Last edited:

Jeff Head

General
Registered Member
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!



15637763236_95678e0af0_b.jpg


Pacific Sentinel said:
SAN DIEGO - The littoral combat ship USS Fort Worth (LCS 3) is scheduled to depart its homeport of San Diego Nov. 17 for a 16-month rotational deployment to Singapore in support of the Navy's strategic rebalance to the Pacific.

Building on the achievements of USS Freedom's (LCS 1) inaugural 10-month deployment to Southeast Asia from March to December 2013, Fort Worth will visit more ports, engage more regional navies during exercises like Cooperation Afloat Readiness and Training (CARAT) and expand LCS capabilities, including embarking and utilizing the MQ-8B Fire Scout Vertical Takeoff and Landing Unmanned Aerial Vehicle (VTUAV).

"There is no doubt that LCS brings an enhanced capability to the Asia-Pacific region," said Vice Adm. Kenneth E. Floyd, U.S. 3rd Fleet commander. "We are proud of the crews for the countless hours of hard work in preparation for this inaugural deployment and we're looking forward to Fort Worth building on the successes and lessons learned from Freedom's deployment last year."

Fort Worth, with embarked LCS crew 104, recently completed its final certifications for its deployment during Task Group Exercise off the coast of Southern California.

After departing San Diego, Fort Worth will visit ports in Hawaii and Guam before arriving in its maintenance and logistics hub of Singapore. The ship will remain homeported in San Diego and all crew members will live aboard.

Caption for the Photo: The littoral combat ship USS Fort Worth (LCS 3) transits during a Task Group Exercise (TGEX) that includes other U.S. Navy participants, along with . ships from the Royal Canadian Navy and Japan Maritime Self-Defense Force. The exercise, led by U.S. 3rd Fleet, serves to train independently deploying units in air defense, anti-submarine warfare, surface warfare and maritime interdiction operations, while also building cooperative relationships. Joint, interagency and international relationships strengthen U.S. 3rd Fleet's ability to respond to crises and protect the collective maritime interests of the U.S. and it's allies and partners. (U.S. Navy photo by Mass Communication Specialist.
 

TerraN_EmpirE

Tyrant King
Su-24 defeats AEGIS system. US sailors resign out of fear.

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
Didn't we already cover that? I believe the exact determinations was that we should print the article and disperse it over a farmers field as there is so much Bull ____ in it, it should act as excellent fertilizer.
US Army Works Toward Single Ground Robot
Nov. 15, 2014 - 11:20AM | By JOE GOULD | Comments
A
A
Unmanned and Ready: The US Army is refurbishing a portion of its robot fleet, including the Talon IV, by QinetiQ.
Unmanned and Ready: The US Army is refurbishing a portion of its robot fleet, including the Talon IV, by QinetiQ. (Maj. Penny Zamora/ / US Army)
FILED UNDER
World News
North America
WASHINGTON — The US Army is pruning 40 percent of its ground robotics fleet, removing obsolete or excess robots before it goes to a single ground machine, according to Program Executive Office Combat Support and Combat Service Support (PEO CS&CSS).

The Army plans to refurbish 1,477 of its ground robots, which is about 60 percent of the total fleet, said Michael Clow, PEO CS&CSS strategic communication lead.

“After reset, current robots will be fielded to units to use as bridge capabilities until final programs of record are fielded, at which time the reset robots will be replaced by the program of record equipment,” Clow said.

The robots due for reset:

■ 353 QinetiQ Talon IVs, of which 296 will go to Army engineers and 57 to the National Guard.

■ 224 iRobot 510 FasTac Packbots.

■ 219 Dragon Runner 10s by QinetiQ.

■ 436 iRobot FirstLooks.

■ 245 iRobot 310s.

The Army’s Robot Logistics Support Center at Selfridge Air National Guard Base in Michigan is conducting the reset. The center has performed field and sustainment-level maintenance on the Army’s robots for the past eight years. The robots will be reset to a baseline configuration unless obsolescence requires a revised configuration, Clow said.

Formal Program
Speaking at an Association for Unmanned Vehicle Systems International conference here, the Army’s force development chief, Maj. Gen. Robert Dyess, generally echoed Army leaders’ dire predictions for the service’s budget, but he said “there is light” for unmanned ground systems.

The president’s 2016 budget, he said, is expected to shift ground robots fielded on an ad hoc basis during the wars into formal programs, albeit at a slower pace and with less funding than manufacturers may prefer.

“Development for the Army is relatively limited right now,” Dyess told reporters after his remarks. “It’s more like, ‘fix what we have and make it better, and have fewer things in development because there’s this desert you have to cross before you’re fully funded.’ ”

The Army invested more than $730 million in unmanned ground vehicles, which were rapidly fielded to Afghanistan and Iraq. Few are interoperable, are optimized to share information or have payloads, sensors or software that aren’t outmoded. The result is a mixed fleet of systems with high sustainment costs

Through its Man Transportable Robotic System (MTRS) program, the Army is switching out proprietary for government-owned hardware and software in its 900 Talon robots and the 300 PackBots, using an engineering change proposal, Dyess said.

Under the current phase of MTRS, Increment 2, the Army will move to a single unmanned ground vehicle with one configu*ration, Clow said. The program anticipates a production decision next summer before a request for proposals in 2016.

Meanwhile, Congress’ inability to pass a budget could derail a separate Army robotics procurement program — the Common Robotic System Individual (CRS-I). It’s intended to yield a new backpack-carried ground robot for surveillance missions, or bombs and hazardous materials, for soldiers on foot.

According to Dyess, the CRS-I would likely be delayed if Congress passes a continuing resolution, which would fund the government at last year’s level. Congress has not passed a defense budget on time since 2005.

CRS-I is intended to replace the terminated small unmanned ground vehicle program — at half the weight and cost, Dyess said.

The CRS-I, announced in an Army market survey in June, would weigh 20 pounds or less and allow a soldier to set it up in five minutes and operate it from up to 300 meters away. It would feature a joint plug-and-play architecture for sensors, claw arms and other peripherals, which allows the government to procure and service these separately.

Army officials have briefed a plan to begin fielding the CRS-I in 2020 as a joint program with the Marine Corps, for a total of 5,266 systems. The CRS-I program is working toward a materiel development decision this summer, according to PEO CS&CSS.

“Rules regarding continuing resolutions and new program start activities certainly could impact many programs if passed — including CRS-I,” Clow said. “As with all programs, we will adjust to budgetary changes as needed while continuing to pursue the timely delivery of improved, affordable capabilities for America’s soldiers.”

QinetiQ is among the companies that responded to the CRS-I market survey and is awaiting the Army’s final requirements for MTRS, said Jason Montano, the company’s product manager for Talon robots. For the latter, QinetiQ is offering its Talon V, which is compliant with the Army’s plug-and-play interoperability architecture, he said.

The Talon V, Montano said, sports a host of electronics upgrades, including a more powerful processor, more communications throughput and, physically, it is better able to climb stairs and lift heavier objects.

“It’s a product we have been working hard on for the last three or four years,” Montano said. “It’s the next-generation robot to benefit soldiers and keep soldiers out of harm’s way.” ■
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

Fight Over A-10 Re-opens Hill, US Air Force Divide
Nov. 15, 2014 - 04:46PM | By AARON MEHTA | Comments

A
A
Osan maintainers keep A-10s flying high
Cross-talk: A US Air Force claim that it needs to retire the A-10 for its maintenance teams has reignited deep mistrust between the service and the Hill. (Senior Airman Ashley Taylor/ / US Air Force)
FILED UNDER
CongressWatch
WASHINGTON — After a relatively quiet summer, the battle for the future of the A-10 Warthog exploded in the last two weeks, reopening deep fissures between Congress and the US Air Force that seem to show the two sides at a total stalemate.

The A-10 issue — the Air Force wants to scrap it, Congress wants to keep it — has aroused a passionate array of protectors in a way the Air Force seemed unprepared to deal with. At this point, neither side in the debate is willing to trust the other’s ideas or facts.

Deborah Lee James, service secretary, acknowledged in July that the service needs to do a better job of showing “consistency” to members of Congress, and the drive to better relations with the Hill was highlighted as a key part in the service’s newest 30-year strategy document.

While that is a noble goal, those in the trenches indicate trust is still a hard concept for the two sides, particularly when the A-10 is involved.

The relations between the Hill and the Air Force have been degrading since the middle of the last decade, said Mackenzie Eaglen of the American Enterprise Institute.

“There is no doubt that is an issue, and this current crop of leadership has tried hard to steer the vessel in a new direction and to slowly move the organization back to a place of mutual trust with the Hill,” Eaglen said.

The current A-10 fight “just goes to show how deep the damage has been and how lasting the effects are,” she added.

Emotions are running high on both sides, creating a winner-take-all culture that is unlikely to result in any sort of compromise.

One Hill staffer who has been engaged with the service on the A-10 issue said there is a feeling the service plays with facts and figures to force its argument down the throat of Congress.

“Their arguments come up, don’t stand up to facts, we push back, we don’t get satisfying responses, and my assessment is the Air Force wants to retire the A-10 and they don’t want to find a solution to make it work,” the staffer said.

Rep. Ron Barber, an Arizona Democrat who made saving the A-10 a key part of his re-election campaign, expressed frustration with the service during a Nov. 13 rally in support of the plane.

“We’ve seen several attempts by the Air Force to go around our decisions, to make moves to divest even though we told them not to,” Barber added, his voice rising in anger. “We will continue to tell them to listen to the will of Congress.

“The Air Force, they are persistent. But so are we. We’re not going to give up this fight until we prevail.”

On the other side, two Air Force officials complained that the Hill ignores the service’s analysis supporting the need to retire the Warthog.

Those officials singled out Sen. Kelly Ayotte, R-N.H., as particularly dug in on the issue, and complained that her office doesn’t offer any alternatives when it rejects options brought forth from the Air Force.

“The options, we’ve [explained] — in exquisite detail — why those aren’t feasible options,” one official said, “it comes down to, she just doesn’t believe us.”

“If they had something to offer, believe me, we would go take a look at it,” the second official said.

Maintenance Battle Lines
The latest fight over maintainers is a perfect summary of the situation.

The Air Force is claiming that its planned Aug. 16 initial operating capability (IOC) date for its fleet of F-35A joint strike fighters is now in peril because the A-10 cannot be retired, as a large chunk of the 1,100 maintainers needed for IOC on the stealthy jet were to be moved from the stood-down fleet of Warthogs.

Members of Congress who appeared at a Nov. 13 event supporting the A-10, including Ayotte, expressed skepticism over the sudden use of the F-35 as a talking point.

“The Air Force has continued to make this a false choice between the F-35 and the A-10,” Ayotte said, noting the argument has just appeared on the scene after previous talking points failed to retire the Warthog. “How many different arguments has the Air Force made along the way?”

“I’m not trying to impugn their motives,” the senator later told Defense News. “I just think they have been of the mindset from the beginning to retire this airframe, and that mindset doesn’t seem to have shifted despite the Congress weighing in pretty clearly on this.”

The service officials countered by saying they looked at 11 choices for how to handle this issue, and while it weighed them all, the A-10 retirement remains the best choice.

Take two of those 11 choices as examples of the “he said, she said” nature of the discussion.

One option would involve finding Air National Guard volunteers to come online and take over some F-35 maintenance work. The Air Force officials said that plan has many flaws, including requiring pulling Guardsmen from their units and the fact their civilian jobs would not be guaranteed without a full mobilization order from the president.

The staffer disagreed with that assessment, concluding that the service could find a way to make it work. “After interviews and exchanges I’ve had with the Air Force, I was left with the impression they have not fully explored the mobilization option,” the staffer said.

What about turning to contract maintainers? Could Lockheed Martin workers, already familiar with the F-35, chip in?

The Air Force claims it will take a year to spin up those contractors and establish a contract vehicle to get them on board. But the staffer believes there is a contracting vehicle in place through existing agreements with Lockheed.

Eaglen believes both sides have an argument, but are simply talking past each other at this point.

“The Hill is right the Air Force has lots of options, and the Air Force is right they probably chose the best one,” she said. “Just because there is another option doesn’t make it the best option that hurts the [least].”

Perhaps most telling, the Air Force is talking with members of the Hill about a partial retirement — shutting down three A-10 squadrons, or about 72 planes, which the service officials said would free up enough maintainers to handle F-35A IOC.

On the face, that would seem like a compromise. The Air Force gets enough planes retired for its requirement, while keeping the Warthog around to protect troops on the ground. But the Hill staffer derided that idea, calling it “just another version of the same plan to divest the A-10, and that is not a compromise.

“There is a pattern here of ‘give me what I’m asking for,’ but framing it as a compromise,” the staffer said. “This is not the first time they’ve done this. They tried to send some to the boneyard and called it a ‘compromise.’ That’s not a compromise. That’s how you divest things.”

Both Barber and Ayotte have rejected that option, leaving the service and Congress once again at loggerheads — and growing increasingly frustrated with each other.

“The Air Force doesn’t want to find a creative solution of fully [maintaining] the F-35A, which is a requirement they’ve known about for years and should not have been surprised by,” the staffer said. “The question is whether they want to.”

“We’ve gone through it and they haven’t been able to provide us with a viable option,” the first Air Force official countered.

At the start of the summer, Eaglen expected the A-10 fight to end as these things usually do — with the Air Force getting its way, even if it had to wait a year or two. Now, she’s not certain that is true.

“I’m surprised at the ferocity of the A-10 community,” she said. “They punch above their weight class. I’ve seen this fight play out a million times before and it doesn’t turn out this way normally. Eventually the services get their way. But there are always exceptions, and this may prove to be one of them.” ■
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!


Honeywell to Supply Textron Scorpion Engine
Nov. 14, 2014 - 12:30PM | By AARON MEHTA | Comments
1
A
A
Textron AirLand has selected Honeywell to provide the engine for its Scorpion jet.
Textron AirLand has selected Honeywell to provide the engine for its Scorpion jet. (Textron AirLand)
FILED UNDER
World News
North America
WASHINGTON — Textron AirLand has selected Honeywell Aerospace to provide the engine for its new Scorpion jet, the companies announced Thursday.

The surveillance/light attack jet will be powered by the Honeywell’s TFE731-40AR-3S engine, which has been in use with the one production model of the Scorpion that has been produced so far. That model has flown overseas to the UK, as well as to various events inside the US, without issue.

“Selection of Honeywell’s TFE731-40 engine for the Scorpion continues the strong partnership we’ve had with Textron for over two decades,” Mike Madsen, president for Defense and Space at Honeywell Aerospace, said in a company statement. “Honeywell’s ability to provide a proven, reliable and high-performance engine for this platform helped Textron AirLand bring this innovative aircraft to market in a shorter timeframe and cost-effective manner.”

The company release noted that the TFE731-40AR-3S has provided more than 90 million hours of operation on more than 13,000 engines delivered, primarily on smaller commercial planes.

“Honeywell has been a vitally important partner since the inception of the Scorpion program, and the engines have performed exceptionally well throughout the flight testing program,” Textron spokesman David Sylvestre wrote in a statement. “We’ve now exceeded 100 flights, reached the 45,000 foot ceiling, and the aircraft has had virtually 100% availability since the first flight in December 2013.”

Settling on Honeywell may represent one of the few locked-in suppliers for the program. Textron wants to be as flexible as possible with suppliers, particularly on weapons and sensors. The company has advertised the jet with sensors from MBDA, Raytheon, Lockheed Martin and FLIR, amongst others.

“Other key suppliers to the program will be announced as they are selected,” Sylvestre said.

Designed and marketed as an ISR plane with strike capabilities, the Scorpion was first unveiled in September 2013. The jet has since won over a number of critics with its low cost and modular nature, a benefit of focusing on largely off-the-shelf components and composite parts. The firm is also planning a trainer variant of the jet.

Although Textron AirLand has yet to land a first customer, sources tell Defense News that the United Arab Emirates is in discussion to acquire the jet.■
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

Hagel Directs Leadership Changes, New Funding for Nuclear Community
Nov. 14, 2014 - 03:45AM | By BRIAN EVERSTINE | Comments
A
A
Secretary of Defense Chuck Hagel announced increased funding requests for the nuclear mission following a review that found poor morale and aging infrastructure.
Secretary of Defense Chuck Hagel announced increased funding requests for the nuclear mission following a review that found poor morale and aging infrastructure. (US Defense Department)
FILED UNDER
World News
North America
US Defense Secretary Chuck Hagel has directed the Air Force to elevate its top nuclear missile leadership, and authorized the Defense Department to request a 10 percent increase in funding for its nuclear enterprise every year for the next five years to address systematic issues across the nuclear triad.

The announcements came as Hagel outlined the results of two reviews of the missile enterprise, which found systematic problems in funding, career advancement, leadership and inspections in both the Air Force and Navy nuclear communities. The reviews have produced about 100 recommendations, including the increase in funding. Hagel approved an Air Force request to raise the billet for its commander of Air Force Global Strike Command from a three-star to to be a four-star, and the head of the service's nuclear integration, currently a two-star, to become a three-star billet.

"Our nuclear deterrent plays a critical role in ensuring us national security and it is DOD's highest priority mission," Hagel told reporters today. "No other capability we have is more important."

An internal review of the nuclear communities found a series of problems that needed to be addressed, including a blurring of the line of accountability and perfection in the Air Force, inadequate facilities, a rapidly aging civilian workforce in Navy shipyards, a lack of promotion opportunities, stress on submarine crews in the Navy, and an "unduly burdensome, overly technical and excessively risk-averse" implementation of the personnel reliability program for nuclear crews.

"The root cause has been a lack of a sustained focus, attention and resources, resulting in a pervasive sense that a career in the nuclear enterprise offers few opportunities for growth and advancement," Hagel said.

The review found excessive inspections, especially in the Air Force, led to a demand for perfection and the lack of a meaningful self-assessment program. A survey of the enterprise found the infrastructure is aging, meaning sustainment is becoming more difficult, time-consuming and expensive.

To address these issues, the Defense Department will increase the amount of funding it requests for its nuclear community, even in the face of strict budget restrictions. Over the next five fiscal years, the department is looking at a 10 percent increase in each year beginning with the fiscal 2016 budget request, Hagel said. The department currently spends about $15 billion on the nuclear enterprise.

Additional funding will also focus on people, as well as infrastructure. The Air Force has exempted 4,000 airmen in the nuclear community from manpower reductions, while adding more than 1,100 billets to Global Strike Command for maintenance, operations and security. The Navy has reduced "administrative distractions" and will hire more than 2,500 workers to address infrastructure issues at shipyards and in training facilities.

Hagel has directed Jamie Morin, the director of the department's cost evaluation and program assessment, to lead a review team to meet every five weeks to follow up on how the recommendations are being implemented.

In addition to the internal review, an external review led by former Air Force Chief of Staff retired Gen. Larry Welch and retired Navy Admiral John Harvey Jr. found similar infrastructure and morale issues across the service.

"Among the most serious problems encountered were a series of significant disconnects, including those between what the DOD and service leadership expected and what the leadership did to empower the forces to meet those expectations; what leadership says and presumably believes and what the sailors, airmen and Marines who must execute the mission actually experience," the report states.

The 60-page report outlined deep infrastructure issues at missile bases, and a lack of tools needed for those on the ground. For example, the report found that a single tool required to tighten the warhead on a Minuteman III missile had to be shared among crews at the Air Force's three missile bases. Crews would FedEx the tool to each base as needed.

"It's indicative of the depth and width of what has happened over the last few years," Hagel said. "A lack of focus, and little attention to some of these specific areas. It wasn't just resources, partly it's cultural."

Crews had to be creative to make it work, Hagel said. Now, the service plans two of these tool sets for each base.??

The review took an in-depth look at recent cheating incidents that have shaken the nuclear communities in both the Navy and the Air Force.

In August, the Navy announced that 34 sailors were being kicked out for their involvement in a cheating ring that went on for at least seven years at a nuclear power training site at Charleston, South Carolina. The review found that although this exam was just one part of an advanced qualification, success on it had far-reaching consequences, including advancement to chief petty officer in the nuclear forces and completion is a motivation for sailors seeking prototype training duty.

"They move their families and some buy homes in Charleston," the review stated. "They see their professional and personal lives as hinging on success in this qualification, and thus this exam."

Going forward, the review recommended that the secretary of the Navy and the chief of naval operations insure that the director of naval reactors provide an in-depth report on actions to address the broader organizational, cultural and institutional leadership issues contributing to the cheating incident.

The Air Force's cheating scandal, which focused on almost 100 missile officers at Malmstrom Air Force Base, Montana, early this year served as a catalyst for the nuclear reviews. The service has found that an overemphasis on inspections and exams led to a culture where perfection was required, and missileers cheated to get the best possible scores on their exams. The service has already changed its tests to a pass/fail system to address this, and the review urged the chief of staff of the Air Force to join the chief of naval operations to ensure that training and skill testing is focused on measuring whether the airman's or sailor's knowledge is necessary and sufficient for the mission, instead of testing devolving into a counterproductive demand for high grades.

The independent review panel visited all the military's nuclear bases, but called Minot Air Force Base, North Dakota, a "special case."

"Conditions at Minot magnify many of the challenges discussed in this report," the review states.

The base is the service's most remote of the missile sites, and puts intense demands on its airmen because of the weather and the nuclear mission. Airmen face more demanding travel to and from dispersed ICBM facilities. Limits on hours of the base's commissary and daycare impact morale. Personnel policies at the base have limited how airmen advance, such as senior noncommissioned officers often retiring rather than accepting assignments at the base. There's a lack of training to qualify 3-level arrivals for missile, bomber and warhead maintenance, and the time and energy of 5- and 7-level technicians is solely focused on keeping ICBMs and bombers on alert, rather than training other aircrews.

"Minot and the Minot mission was the toughest in the Air Force," Welch told reporters today. "There was a sense of pride that went with being from Minot. In (the former) Strategic Air Command, if you had not served at Minot, you were not a real (nuclear officer).

"Over the years, that gradually disappeared, as the nuclear mission moved from MAJCOM to MAJCOM in the Air Force. The northern tier did not get the kind of emphasis that was demanded in the kind of environment you exist in in the northern tier."

The review recommends that Air Force leadership direct a special priority for mission support and support for families at Minot, along with initiating controlled tours at the northern tier missile bases — Minot, Malmstrom and F.E. Warren Air Force Base, Wyoming.

Following today's announcement of the recommendations, Hagel and Air Force Secretary Deborah Lee James left the Pentagon to visit with airmen at Minot and discuss the coming changes to the community.
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

'Small' Leak Sidelines US Submarine For 5 Months
Nov. 14, 2014 - 06:22PM | By CHRISTOPHER P. CAVAS | Comments
1
A
A
A small leak in the reactor plant sidelined the submarine Jefferson City's deployment in mid-summer, leaving it stuck in Guam. The submarine is seen here on an earlier cruise.
A small leak in the reactor plant sidelined the submarine Jefferson City's deployment in mid-summer, leaving it stuck in Guam. The submarine is seen here on an earlier cruise. (US Navy)
FILED UNDER
World News
Asia & Pacific Rim
WASHINGTON — When the US nuclear submarine Jefferson City left its homeport of San Diego April 9, its 150-man crew expected to spend six months cruising the Western Pacific and beyond. Instead, the sub has languished since mid-June in Guam, sidelined by a tiny leak that proved difficult to find and harder to repair.

“USS Jefferson City has a very small water leak from a valve located in one of the ship’s reactor propulsion plant systems,” Cmdr. Brook DeWalt, spokesman for the Pacific Fleet Submarine Force at Pearl Harbor, said on Friday.

“Since the leak was so small, extensive investigation with sensitive instruments was required to identify the location,” DeWalt said. “Once it was ID’d, they needed additional time to review repair options.”

Although the water is from the reactor’s cooling systems, radioactivity concerns are “negligible,” DeWalt assured. “The water contains only trace amounts of radioactivity and is being collected on board the ship.”

The amount of water being collected, he added, is “probably a few gallons a day,” and is being handled routinely. “The ship’s systems are more than capable of handling this amount of water and containing it on board,” DeWalt said.

Jefferson City pulled into Guam June 21 with the intention of dealing with maintenance issues in the shaft seals and auxiliary seawater systems, DeWalt said. A water leak of some sort was also apparent, manifesting itself as increased condensation. It was first thought to be a cooling coil leak.

Guam is a familiar place for submariners — three other Los Angeles-class subs are based there, along with the submarine tender Frank Cable.

The crew of the Jefferson City expected only a short stay, but the leak proved far more difficult to locate than anticipated.

“Finding the leak was not an easy thing to do,” DeWalt said. “It really did take bringing in very sensitive, specialized equipment to ID and find it. It took quite a bit of time.”

By July, it became clear the submarine would not continue with the operational goals of the cruise. “The mission changed to dealing with their maintenance issues,” DeWalt said.

“After they found the leak, it was a matter of figuring out what to do next — repair the submarine in Guam, San Diego or Pearl Harbor. The determination was that the expertise was on site at Pearl Harbor, as opposed to flying people out there.”

The Jefferson City already was scheduled to undergo a 22-month dry docking overhaul at Pearl Harbor beginning in the summer of 2015. The Navy decided to move up the overhaul and combine it with the valve repairs, but dry dock availability has been an issue.

Complicating the situation, the ship was to temporarily shift homeport to Pearl Harbor during the nearly two-year overhaul, allowing family members to move. All those arrangements needed to be moved up as well.

Preparations, DeWalt said, are nearly complete, and Jefferson City is expected to leave Guam shortly, arriving in Pearl before the end of November.

Other submarines covered for Jefferson City’s absence, DeWalt said, and no specific surge deployment was needed.

The cost of the repairs is not yet available, he added.

DeWalt emphasized Jefferson City’s crew has performed well during a difficult time.

“The crew and leadership have done a remarkable job keeping focused while they’ve been in Guam,” DeWalt said. “They deserve a lot of credit for maintaining the level of training and proficiencies while dealing with the maintenance issues.

“It was definitely different and not what was planned, but they certainly turned to.”

Mark D. Faram contributed to this report.
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

US Marines in market for Reaper-sized UAS
By: DAN PARSONSWASHINGTON DC Source: Flightglobal.com 17:25 14 Nov 2014
The US Marine Corps, which has largely relied on small tactical and hand-launched unmanned air systems, announced recently it is in the market for a larger, long-endurance type.

Marine Aviation Plan 2015 is the first planning document to mention a requirement for a medium- to high-altitude, long-endurance UAS, which brings to mind the General Atomics Aeronautical Systems MQ-9 Reaper operated by the US Air Force.

The Marines have been the lone hold-out among US military services against operating General Atomics platforms, relying so far on hand-launched aircraft that are well suited to gathering airborne intelligence for small units in expeditionary environments.

Doug Hardison, General Atomics Aeronautical Systems’ strategic development manager for US Navy and Marine Corps programmes, says impending changes to the Marine’s shipboard aircraft fleet have put it in the market for a larger UAS.

Beginning in fiscal year 2016, the USMC will gradually retire its fleet of 20 Northrop Grumman EA-6B Prowler electronic warfare aircraft. The service intends to replace them with an operational concept called Marine Air-Ground Task Force Electronic Warfare (MAGTF-EW).

A key component of MAGTF-EW is to offload at least some of the electronic warfare mission to larger, longer-range unmanned air systems, Hardison says. The decision to pursue a programme of record was made during FY2014, according to Headquarters Marine Corps. The service then launched a capabilities assessment of MALE/HALE unmanned aircraft, which is ongoing.

Introduction of the Bell Boeing V-22 Osprey, which allows Marines to operate at vastly greater distances than traditional rotorcraft, has created a need for unmanned intelligence, surveillance and reconnaissance (ISR) systems that can keep up with them, Hardison says.

“They envision a larger UAS that’s got the long endurance, long range, that is a truck where you can change out payloads quickly, where you can upgrade payloads quickly, and you are now in a position to support all the other new equipment in Marine aviation.”

The USMC is looking for systems that can take off from land and be controlled from a ship that can go wherever a Marine Expeditionary Unit's two dedicated Lockheed Martin C-130 Hercules aircraft can go.

General Atomics Aeronautical Systems plans to offer a UAS that can access any airfield on which a KC-130 can land and take off, generally a runway of between 3,000ft (914m) and 3,500ft in length, Hardison says. The company has already worked with the USAF to modify the MQ-9, including increasing engine power.

“The residual benefit of that is we have a capability that is more expeditionary,” he says.

The Marines already operate the Boeing-Insitu RQ-21 Integrator, which can be launched and recovered from a ship or on shore. The MQ-X is the “next logical step”, Hardison says.

“That’s why the Marine Corps is finally ending up in the direction that it’s headed with regards to introducing the MQ-X.”
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

New Seeker Could Put Tomahawk In Long-Range Anti-Ship Missile Race

Aviation Week & Space Technology
Tony Osborne
Wed, 2014-11-12 04:00
Raytheon is funding a seeker upgrade to the Tomahawk missile to extend its life into the 2030s
Thirty years since the first iterations entered service, the Tomahawk cruise missile remains one of the key elements in the U.S. Navy’s long-range attack capability.

Nearly 50 of the missiles were recently fired against Islamic State militants and other terror groups during the early airstrikes in Syria as part of what is now known as Operation Inherent Resolve, and the weapon has been used as the opening shot in many of the major military operations since Desert Storm in 1991. It is often used to hit strategically important targets.

But Raytheon wants to further boost the weapon’s tactical capabilities to ready it for a possible contest to meet the U.S. Navy’s Offensive Anti-Surface Warfare requirement.

The company is spending $40 million of its own cash to improve the moving target and discrimination systems on the Block IV model weapon that entered service with the U.S. Navy in 2004. In 2008, the U.K. Royal Navy adopted the torpedo-tube-fired version.

Recent trials vetted a new-design passive seeker that detects radiation emitters. This was flown in April on an adapted T-39 Sabreliner business jet testbed equipped with the nose of a Tomahawk fitted to the front of the aircraft. The passive seeker will give the weapon electronic support measures, including listening for particular radar types and helping to steer the weapon away from benign civilian radars that monitor weather.

Next spring, the company will test a millimeter-wave, active seeker combined with a new high-speed processor, which will allow the weapon to image the target to confirm it is the correct one before entering terminal attack maneuvers. The company wants to achieve a technology readiness level of 6 on the seeker before captive-carry flights next summer.

“Our strategy was to have one missile doing all missions, explained Roy Donelson, program director for Tomahawk at Raytheon, speaking at the London Science Museum on Oct. 27.

“Tomahawk is already capable of dealing with mobile and fixed targets [and now] we can provide better target discrimination, better capability against moving targets with the seeker.”

Currently, the only way for Tomahawk to hit mobile targets is by using the Block IV’s ability to deliver new GPS coordinates of the target to the weapon through its data link. The three Cruise Missile Support Activity sites at Norfolk Virginia, Hawaii and Northwood, U.K., responsible for planning Tomahawk missions, are able to rapidly pass updated target position information in the final moments—the end game—of the missile’s flight. This provides the weapons with the potential for long-range anti-ship strike, as well as the ability to handle significant mobile targets on land.

It has been more than a decade since the Navy ditched the Tomahawk Anti-Ship Missile, a version of the weapon fitted with inertial guidance and the seeker head from the Boeing Harpoon anti-ship missile. Raytheon says one concern with that version was its inability to clearly discriminate between targets, especially from a long distance.

Donelson believes the weapon could be ideal for any future long-range anti-ship requirement because of the new seeker, but specifications for a potential Increment II Offensive Anti-Surface Warfare competition are not yet available.

The company has also proved that the weapon could perform battle-damage-assessment missions by relaying images via a data link as it passes over previously attacked targets on the way to its own, and it has also completed a series of high- and medium-altitude flights. The ability to take out concrete-reinforced structures may also be introduced through the use of the Joint Multiple Effects Warhead System (JMEWS), originally tested in 2010. Donelson says an engineering, manufacturing, and development contract for JMEWS could emerge in 2016.

The company hopes the Navy will keep the weapon in production until at least 2019 when early batches of the Block IV missile will need to be recertified and upgraded for another 15 years of life. The fiscal 2015 budget calls for production of around 100 missiles, but $82 million more maybe added to allow for another 96 missiles to be purchased.



A version of this article appears in the November 3/10 issue of Aviation Week & Space Technology.

Source URL:
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
 
Last edited:

Black Shark

Junior Member
Wanted to post this little funny promo video.

It is quite amusing.
[video=youtube;OWllcHcn8z8]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OWllcHcn8z8[/video]
 

HMS Astute

Junior Member
No...these are just claims. And the overall AEGIS system is not what they would be jamming in any case.

Think about the relative amount of power available to an SU-24 and the amount available to a Burke class DDG for EW. That will lead to some obvious conclusions about overall jamming ability one to another.

Now, with the proper EW pods, they might be able to pull off specialized jamming no doubt...but I do not recall seeing such pods in the pictures of the fly overs...and active jamming like that would be viewed very seriously...a hostile associated with an attack.

Very dangerous and something the US would have either reacted to very directly at the time...or would have registered a much stronger complaint internationally at the time.

US State Department confirmed the crew of USS DONALD COOK were highly demoralized and the many sailors also resigned after this happened. So this ain't no usual Russian propaganda i suppose. :confused:

I also like to know how the US is going to respond to Russian provocation in it's backyard. Should the USAF send in a fleet consists of at least 8x F22 to patrol and unnerve those rusty bears when they come near florida or california?

Russian bombers to patrol Caribbean and the Gulf of Mexico

[video=youtube;6sLA3mwp6Wc]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6sLA3mwp6Wc[/video]
 
Last edited:
Top