How can F-47 be cheaper than F-22 while has significantly longer range, more advanced stealth, higher availability, and more sustainable & supportable?
1. Once we adjust for inflation, the flyaway cost of a single F-22 is ~$232 million. That might seem "low" to some folks relative to certain speculative figures that may have been thrown around on how much the NGAD PCA will cost, but that's still a lot of $ to work with per airframe.
Keep in mind that is almost the flyaway cost of three F-35A fighters, which were for lots 15, 16 and 17.
According to the , inclusive of projected figures for FY08 and FY09.
View attachment 148370
Adjusted for inflation, ~$154 million in 2008 is about ~$232 million in 2025 dollars, , especially as he was likely estimating the cost of the F-47 on the basis of the F-35A rather than the F-35B or F-35C.
2. Lockheed delivered 187 operational F-22 fighters to the USAF, even though the USAF had originally intended to acquire a total of 750 airframes or so. As you can imagine, certain fixed costs for designing, engineering and manufacturing the F-22 effectively stayed constant even though total procurement was slashed by ~75%.
This inevitably made the F-22 significantly less economical on a per unit basis than what the USAF had projected.
Current claims that the F-47 will be cheaper than the F-22 are likely based on anticipated total production figures that will allow Boeing and by extension the US government to achieve significant cost savings through economies of sale. However, whether that will actually be achievable or not is obviously TBD.