williamhou
Junior Member
Where is the RuAF? And what are the Buk and other SAM systems there for? Bizarre…
So many drones salespeople here it feels like a military drone convention
What the USA could do ?Cold war doctrine was that any tactical nuclear attack would be of limited use as it would likely lead to a full on nuclear war. That's why the Americans didn't really bother with them. The Soviets did because they used them for engineering projects.
I doubt America will sit around if a country in NATO is nuked. The UK has no vote in a full on nuclear war, the go ahead would come from America. At least for their tridents. France do have independent launch systems.
NATO has nukes.NATO hans't got any nuke.
USA, UK and France has, and they will use it ONLY if they mainland attacked with nuke, or they are in direct danger to get destroyed by conventional force.
Anything outside of the CONUS, UK mainland and France can be nuked by the Russians.In worst case they will be sanctioned.
Me too!Come on! I kept low during the first days of the war thinking it would be an easy victory for the Russians. I'm pleasantly surprised how the Ukrainians are holding out. I'm the guy that almost always roots for the underdog!
Well they need to cover their a** and they even moved topol system in Moscow... so they are planning for everything beside invading another country with young conscript...Where is the RuAF? And what are the Buk and other SAM systems there for? Bizarre…
Just willing to be neutral at this point is so far from the Russian position there's literally no point in talking. What about the territory they lost?Supposedly the negotiations are over. That was very, very short.
I find the Ukrainian claim to be willing to be neutral to be an interesting development, and if the negotiations built off that, that's heartening.
However, given how short the negotiations were, and how this entire thing went down, I think the negotiations were probably fruitless, and neither side saw a point to it.