Russia's war only make sense if you can rapidly gain capitulation at minimal economic costs. In contrast, a 'forever war' + 10-15 years of lost economic growth is too costly for the original demands.
Russia is currently training their army which will get to fight WW3 if necessary.
I disagree with this as well. Sounds like copium.
A 'S
pecial military operation' is insufficient for 'train to fight a WW3'.
You need to 'whole-of-society' mobilization, martial law, and wartime economy to 'train to fight a WW3'.
Also, we don't see Su-57s, T-14 Armadas, Tu-22M strategic bombers, and other equipment you expect in a peer-to-peer WW3 conflict. In fact, Russia is mostly using it's older gear like T-72s, none of it's most modernized hardware. So how can you even say they are "training for WW3" without using it's latest modernized equipment?