I wish you wouldn't take my response as personal, also I dislike repeating myself, but your criticism of Russian actions is serving the interest of the Westoids.
That's because you are insecure and oversensitive. I regularly post anti-US imperialism posts, see my 16 years of SDF posts.
Russia is China's ally in its efforts to resist Westoid imperialism.
So why doesn't China openly support Russia then at UNSC? Oh yea, because principles and international law does matter.
If you are for the benefit of China and support the spirit of Neutrality, you should at least keep your criticism of Russia to yourself.
If the Russia-China relationship will collapse because of legitimate criticism, then the foundations of the relationship must be built upon sand. Grow up.
Tell us a good reason why it is a good idea to bad mouth a friend who helps you against someone who wants to burn down your house?
Violation of international law and invasion of a sovereign independent country is literal fact. It is not "Bad mouthing" to speak literal fact, even if it is inconvenient to your pro-Russia narrative.
Countries don't need to have an official treaty to be considered allies. You are applying too much legal terms here, what I mean by an ally is that Russia is on China's side in its struggle against Westoid Imperialism.
So they are strongly 'aligned' or a 'comprehensive strategic partnership', not a real alliance. Russia-China are aligned, not allies.
And you do not need to support Russian actions, but supporting Ukraine even after they backstabbed China in favor of America is an Abnormal behavior.
This is a 'False Dilemma Logical Fallacy'.
- Favor Russia
- Favor America
but you ignored the 3rd choice:
- Favor neither (criticize imperialism by both Russia and America).
So please stop with these logical fallacies.
I never advocated for China to openly support Russia, where are you getting this idea from?
Good. China should not openly support Russia because it's actions are literally imperialism and violation of international law. China should stay neutral, and Russia needs help, it can get economic support from China.
What China is doing right now is excellent.
Oh, but I thought US was going to kill China, so why isn't China openly supporting Russia now?
Notice how China is not making derogatory comments in relation to Russian actions?
This is what Chinese Foreign Minister is saying:
In comments on Saturday while addressing the same conference in Munich,
Chinese Foreign Minister Wang Yi said "
"
So what Chinese FM Wang Yi is saying is respecting every country's sovereignty and territorial integrity. Guess who is that directed to?
Perhaps you should be doing the same if you truly subscribe to the idea of Neutrality.
If you read my 16 years of SDF posts you will see I regularly bash US imperialism.
Bashing Russia only serves the interest of Westoid propagandists. Why do you continue this path?
Because my brain is wired to detect bullshit, and I smell bullshit coming from Russian propaganda. Problem? I do the same with US propaganda too.
How is it a legitimate criticism when you didn't weigh in all factors like NATO expansion closer to Russia's heartland and Ukraine's hostility towards China?
This is legitimate criticism. I say US is an imperialistic power, and I say Russia is a imperialistic power, and I support China helping a weaker imperialist (Russia) against a strong imperialist (USA), it doesn't stop me from calling a spade a spade. Are you allergic to the truth?
And the Westoids are spreading disinformation in these countries as well through Westoid mainstream media about how China is out to exploit their countries and drown them in debt traps.
Thank you, if you read my 16 years of SDF posts you will see I regularly identify US imperialism and double-standard hypocrisy.
China's neutral stance won't bring much PR points if China's reputation is smeared 24/7 by Westoid media.
Thank you, if you read my 16 years of SDF posts you will see I regularly identify US imperialism and double-standard hypocrisy.
The KMT receiving donations from US during world war 2 doesn't change the fact that the Yeltsin leadership is a US puppet.
KMT receiving massive US aid means it's a US puppet, and even 'US puppet' KMT did not recognize Tibetan independence post-Qing collapse So why did alleged 'US puppet' Yeltsin recognize Ukrainian independence post-Soviet collapse? There is zero comparison between Tibet and Ukraine.
Oh, now you are asking for "Evidence", there are lots of information out there that clearly points out how the US has supported Yeltsin's government. It's easy to see unless you are completely blind to it.
Hey, US gov't supported China against Soviet Union after 1972, sending many advisers to China. Does that mean China is a 'US puppet'? It's so easy to twist anything as 'US puppet' that is really diminishes the value of your argument. Do you have any other evidence.
Russia is China's ally (or friend or partner if you prefer these terminologies instead). Russia's actions in its own turf are not at the expense of China's interest. The Westoids on the other hand is hell bent on destabilizing and dismembering China.
It's possible to be anti-US and anti-Russian imperialism at the same time. It's called being anti-Imperialism (Russian or American).
There is no point in hating Russia or labeling its actions as imperialist.
There is a point, and it's the reason why China remains neutral at UNSC. The point being, Russian actions are brazen violation of international law, so even China (a best friend) cannot openly support it at UNSC.
This thread as devolved into russiandefenceforum fest. It's my pleasure to call out double-standard hypocrisy from Russophiles like you.
