Is he going tell Modi about the 17,000 mile walk in the Himalayas with Xi?
Is he going tell Modi about the 17,000 mile walk in the Himalayas with Xi?
is this upcoming massive assault on Donbass going to be a reverse Kursk 1943, where an all out offensive against a well prepared and well established defensive line? I really wonder if Russia is going to be bringing any new capabilities to bear to gain a decisive advantage...use of overwhelming firepower WITH the assistance of advanced reconnaissance drones and tech...otherwise it is going to be a bloodbath
[T]hose who brought war into our country deserve all the curses and maledictions a people can pour out.
No, of course not. But at this point the chance of trump getting re-elected seems slim.
I don't have a problem with ALL countries who are fence riders when it comes to China? I have a problem with countries like Russia, Serbia, etc., which are themselves in dire situations. They can't afford to ride on that fence! They ditch J10C for old Mig29 this year, and the next year they go into a bloody war which they can't recover for decades. They are already in dire situations, and instead of trusting China, they hang on to old Russian junks (because of their prejudice) that will surely lead to their upcoming demise.This is a problem I see too often on this forum. People are way too quick here to put labels on other countries because of their geography and certain decisions that appear to be us friendly.
Every country that china can win over with investment, military hardware and high end technology is a good thing for China. Don't assume that you can't be friends with another nation thatay have made a decision that you don't like. As china becomes more advanced militarily and technologically, it will be able to offer other countries more to empower them to make independent decisions or side with china. Don't write anyone off because of certain decisions they made in the past. Times change and circumstances change.
Frankly, china may not even feel comfortable exporting j10c to an European country right now. But in the future, it will be able to help other countries develop their ai industry, their semiconductor industry and renewable industry and supply advanced military hardware that traditional western powers aren't willing to offer. Why would anyone on this forum oppose that?
Mud works both ways. It'll slow the Russian advance, but it'll make a Ukrainian retreat even harder. If anything it'll be much worse for the Ukrainians because of the disparity in the air. Any trapped armour will be free kills for RuAF.There are more questions than answers.
How much and how well either side performs we are going to have to wait and see. Have Russian logistics been sorted out? Are the reports the Russian brigades and regiments are completely in disarray true? Even remotely? Have the Ukrainians been able to reinforce? How much of the assistance will have made it to the east? Is General Mud still in the field when the Russians launch their assault? How long will the assault be delayed before launched? Will the Ukrainians continue to have raids behind the lines? etc. etc. etc. ad nauseum, spew.
My gut feeling is this will be a bloodbath. Ukrainian morale is extremely high. They are beyond enraged and it is not fading. In fact, since General Sherman has been a favorite to quote elsewhere in the thread:
Part of the 'war is hell' passage and completely fits what the Ukrainians are feeling.
I don't have a problem with ALL countries who are fence riders when it comes to China? I have a problem with countries like Russia, Serbia, etc., which are themselves in dire situations. They can't afford to ride on that fence! They ditch J10C for old Mig29 this year, and the next year they go into a bloody war which they can't recover for decades. They are already in dire situations, and instead of trusting China, they hang on to old Russian junks (because of their prejudice) that will surely lead to their upcoming demise.
If Armenia has a fleet of Chinese military drones, do you think they will get their ass kicked by Azerbaijan?
Heck, even Russia right now is on the brink of getting their ass kicked across the galaxy! If they just lowered their noble white head just a little bit and sort China's military technology only just 2 years ago, they would at least be able to integrate Chinese targeting pods to their Sukhois and Migs with an ocean of cheap Beidou/INS guided 250kg class PGM's, and get a huge fleet of cheap attack drones that could have won the war already. At least before the war starts (make an order in 2019, deliver in 2020/2021, and get battle ready just before this war), they could get a couple of 075 LHD and/or 071 LPD, and/or 052D, which would have help to take Odessa in the first wave of attack already. I am pretty sure China would be happy to sell the platform to Russia integrated with Russia missiles systems
At least doing this would be able to chain China to Russia's bandwagon, giving the West an excuse to pressure China, and forces China to react aggressively to those pressures. Right now, China has the luxury of basically distancing herself from this conflict and watching from afar.
There are three main reasons why Armenia lost to Azerbaijan:If Armenia has a fleet of Chinese military drones, do you think they will get their ass kicked by Azerbaijan?
Where are the people screaming "DEBT TRAP!!!!" It's obvious that Ukraine will never be able to pay this back.German armaments manufacturer Krauss-Maffei Wegmann has offered the Ukrainian government the sale of 100 Panzerhaubitze PzH 2000 155mm tracked self-propelled howitzers. The German government has also offered the sale of Boxer 8x8 armored fighting vehicles to the Ukrainian government.
The deal is estimated to be worth €1.7 billion euros [$1,849,005,000.00 USD].
Russia need to pour hell on Ukrainian army in the east, don't know if they have some stockpiles of their giant thermobaric bomb, but i don't know why they don't use a giant air campaign push to decimate the frontline. Do they have nothing to shot at outside cities ?There are more questions than answers.
How much and how well either side performs we are going to have to wait and see. Have Russian logistics been sorted out? Are the reports the Russian brigades and regiments are completely in disarray true? Even remotely? Have the Ukrainians been able to reinforce? How much of the assistance will have made it to the east? Is General Mud still in the field when the Russians launch their assault? How long will the assault be delayed before launched? Will the Ukrainians continue to have raids behind the lines? etc. etc. etc. ad nauseum, spew.
My gut feeling is this will be a bloodbath. Ukrainian morale is extremely high. They are beyond enraged and it is not fading. In fact, since General Sherman has been a favorite to quote elsewhere in the thread:
Part of the 'war is hell' passage and completely fits what the Ukrainians are feeling.
I don't have problem with large nation and relatively safe nations "not buying Chinese weapons". For example, Pakistan rejected a lot of Chinese equipment in the past, but their attitude and approach is pragmatic and workable. I respect that, I even thank them for providing valuable feedbacks and concrete criticisms.I think you're setting some strange standards if your like or dislike of nations is dependent on their willingness to buy Chinese military equipment.
Viewing it objectively, for many Eastern European nations, it is only until recently that Chinese military exports were of a sufficient quality to be seen as desirable alternatives to Russian equipment, and that region is indeed the Russian MIC's traditional stomping ground.
Whether they buy Chinese arms is also not simply a matter of need, but of money. If they lack the money for it, then they simply may not be able to afford certain weapon types and categories, if China will not provide attractive prices (versus what might be available for say, a closer ally like Pakistan).
Additionally, China's ability to effectively market key weapons systems in those markets, compared to competitors, is also a major factor. That is something China can only praise or blame itself for.
Expecting those nations to be as receptive to Chinese arms as a nation like Pakistan, ignores all of the geopolitical and materially qualitative and financial factors involved.
Heck, there may even be some weapons categories that China may not be willing to sell to some Eastern European nations.
So I definitely do not think this idea of "if XYZ nation is a good friend then they should buy weapons". That's just not how the international arms trade works, and it isn't even how the geopolitical factor of how international arms trade works.