In the end when Lithuania should ever be invaded, we as Chinese shouldn’t show much sympathy at all. These idiots love to do the bidding of the USA so inevitably they will suffer greatly for it
Ukrainian War Developments
- Thread starter james smith esq
- Start date
- Status
There are many people who are denying that they are Marines or even Ukrainian forces or militia of any kind, citing that one of them is wearing sneakers and that they are not wearing blue arm bands.
There are several plausible reasons as to why they are probably indeed fighters of Ukraine. The Ukrainians are under siege. They are not getting any additional supplies of food, ammo, and other equipment. They could decide to remove their clear identification insignia of any kinds. The one wearing sneakers might have have had his boots damaged and the Ukrainians are not able to resupply him with military boots, as such he would have been allowed to wear personal boots.
This makes me think that Germany is about to cut off gas imports from Russia.
General Keane explaining that committing war crimes is the Russian way of war, even going as far as buttressing his argument with how cruel they were to the Germans in WW2.
Incinerating a 100,000 Japanese in one night with cluster napalm bombs must have been according to regulations of lawful warfare as he doesn't seem to think the same of the US way of war? The single deadliest air raid of WW2:
Or the fire bombing of North Korea with the same terrible napalm weapons razing to the ground virtually all towns in the country in total disregard of civilian casualties?
Incinerating a 100,000 Japanese in one night with cluster napalm bombs must have been according to regulations of lawful warfare as he doesn't seem to think the same of the US way of war? The single deadliest air raid of WW2:
Or the fire bombing of North Korea with the same terrible napalm weapons razing to the ground virtually all towns in the country in total disregard of civilian casualties?
Last edited:
Cutting off oil and coal is possible. As for gas, it would take at least 2 to 3 years unless German wanted its people to freeze to death.
Give them back to Poland and Germany.
Whatever tricks the Russians might pull in the east, I won't like Russia's chance in this war until I see strategic bombing of all the Dnieper bridges. Of course not including the ones currently in Russian hands (mostly in Kherson).
Bridges are perfect targets. They are limited in numbers over a river as big as the Dnieper. They are not going anywhere. they are easy to take aim at, extremely hard to repair, impossible to defend with Ukr air-defence firepower.
There might be reasons not to do it before April. Now there is no hope for western Ukraine in the forseeable future, and the illusion of "brotherly war" is in the ditch, why not?
As unimpressive as the Russian air force looks in this war, I don't believe they are incapable of destroying immobile things bigger than street blocks. The only technological problem is the riverdam pathways, quite hard to be destroyed without endangering the whole dam. In that case the problem turns into ethical. But those dam-top pathways do not carry railways thus are not so vital, and can be damaged at the ends to cause blockage instead of collapse.
Once the bridges are out, forget about heavy equipment or large troops reinforcement from west to east. Foreign materiel aid would be essentially neutualized. Fuel, ammo and scattered personnel may slip through by ferries, but in what pathetic amount?
Last, only such a massive, deliberate and vicious attack on civilian infrastructure would convince me that Russia seriously wants to win. In fact it would kill a lot less than any other kind of strategic bombing, thanks to Dnieper the perfect natural barrier.
You want the east Ukraine, you set the east to fight alone.
Bridges are perfect targets. They are limited in numbers over a river as big as the Dnieper. They are not going anywhere. they are easy to take aim at, extremely hard to repair, impossible to defend with Ukr air-defence firepower.
There might be reasons not to do it before April. Now there is no hope for western Ukraine in the forseeable future, and the illusion of "brotherly war" is in the ditch, why not?
As unimpressive as the Russian air force looks in this war, I don't believe they are incapable of destroying immobile things bigger than street blocks. The only technological problem is the riverdam pathways, quite hard to be destroyed without endangering the whole dam. In that case the problem turns into ethical. But those dam-top pathways do not carry railways thus are not so vital, and can be damaged at the ends to cause blockage instead of collapse.
Once the bridges are out, forget about heavy equipment or large troops reinforcement from west to east. Foreign materiel aid would be essentially neutualized. Fuel, ammo and scattered personnel may slip through by ferries, but in what pathetic amount?
Last, only such a massive, deliberate and vicious attack on civilian infrastructure would convince me that Russia seriously wants to win. In fact it would kill a lot less than any other kind of strategic bombing, thanks to Dnieper the perfect natural barrier.
You want the east Ukraine, you set the east to fight alone.
Didn't the US kill like 20% of North Korea's population?
Then they whine when US soldiers are depicted as savages in North Korean art.
Agreed..if Ukrainians did not destroy the Dnieper bridges then they should be destroyed now.
Having more gas storage facilities will be of little use without gas to fill them with. This is retarded beyond measure.
If the Germans nationalize Gazprom Germania then Russia might retaliate by nationalizing Unipro.
Unipro is 83.73% owned by German company Uniper.
Uh right. I am sure those guys encircled there for many days have proper supply and everything. Not.
Yep. Their uniforms look Ukrainian to me.
The only way to do that would be to shutdown their industry. Basically.
Last edited:
- Status