ADATS was such a weapon, albeit vehicle-launched. Starstreak (a MANPADS) has some anti-armor capability but definitely not tanks.MANPADS are against air targets and currently aren't suited(Not that you can't) to engage ground targets sensor wise (especially older MANPADS ) neither are they suited to engage tanks or anything remotely armored that can withstand 14,5 mm or more since their Directed-energy blast fragmentation warheads are fairly small and well fragmentation warheads....
However, MANPADS and ATGM fusion is on it's way.
Evolution wise it makes sense. A lot of ATGM's can already be used to down slow and low-flying targets like heli's.
And if you're going to be adding optical seeker especially multichannel ones. Which is what said ATGM will likely have and pretty much all of them will have sooner or later. Might as well make those anti-tank guided missiles even more multipurpose then they already frankly are.
With Starstreak it's more interesting than just secondary capability: they are moving to add Martlet capability to starstreak launchers.ADATS was such a weapon, albeit vehicle-launched. Starstreak (a MANPADS) has some anti-armor capability but definitely not tanks.
"A demonstration was conducted in September 1999 that showed the missile being used against an , showing the missile's effectiveness as a surface-to-surface weapon. Each sub-munition dart travelling at 4,500 kilometres per hour (2,800 mph) has comparable to a shell from a .[] However, it lacks the armour penetration capabilities of a purpose-built or of a dual purpose missile (such as the ). "
That sounds too complicated. If it ever got that bad the whole of Ukraine would get a one way ticket to Siberia.Some are worried about an insurgency for Russia. but typically managing the insurgency is the easy part. British Empire did it all the time. there's Russian speakers in Ukraine. Make them a ruling class with privileges. Ukrainian speakers are made second class citizens. Arm the Russian Ukrainians while disarming Ukrainian speakers. Support the Russian speakers with Russian army units.
Now the Russian Ukrainians have the motivation to put down any insurgency. They'll be a hated collaborator class so they know if they don't put down the insurgents, they end like Rwanda. So they'll be motivated to use an iron fist and accept all Russian aid. That's the stick. The carrot part is that any Ukrainian who proves Russian ancestry and Russian language ability can be admitted to the ruling class.
Is this brutal? Yes. Does it work? Also yes.
Lol, the British empire is dead.Some are worried about an insurgency for Russia. but typically managing the insurgency is the easy part. British Empire did it all the time.
LOL.Dude go back to watching Hannity or Rachel Maddow or whatever.
We've been discussing the issue of NATO's aggression and expansion for the past 1000 pages.
That would be a different missile though.With Starstreak it's more interesting than just secondary capability: they are moving to add Martlet capability to starstreak launchers.
Russia uses resurrection spell, it was also super effective on equipment! 20 MLRS, 300 tanks, 30 fuel tanks, 500 arty and 50 AA also came back from the dead!!View attachment 85665
Goddamn Cloak of the Undead King
An alliance is just an agreement made on paper. If Russia invades Latvia or a Baltic country and threatens a full nuclear response if anyone gets involved. Do you think Americans are all going to agree to die in a nuclear war for Latvia? They'll finally do what they've refused to do so far in this war and sit down with Putin and sort out a deal.No, it's just blocking NATO's expansion Eastward.
NATO is not actually threatened by this, they are just pretending they are threatened, because it benefits Lockheed Martin.
This is Russia defending, not aggressing. NATO is still the aggressor.