Ukrainian War Developments
- Thread starter james smith esq
- Start date
- Status
Definitely would take some training and drill execution to get that movement to turn into muscle memory. These guys had a very modern and well equipped kits.
As @LawLeadsToPeace added that we know that this weapon was reserved for the high tier soldiers. Very easily could be their Spec Ops forces using the targeting data provided by NATO and US. This video could very well be the merit to your statement.
The insurgency in Iraq was doing this. I wonder if the Russians have the same munitions radar we had to pinpoint the position of where the indirect fire was coming from to return fire to that location.
We have a couple of users here who are, for some reason, extremely emotionally attached to this issue and will use any shred of news to show that Russia is going to fall the next day. I guess those users have close ties to Ukraine via friends or family. I don't blame them for jumping on any news that gives them hope, even if it is a lie.
Allegedly another attack by TB2. Low res footage
"#Ukraine: Another Russian Tor-M1 SAM system was destroyed by a Ukrainian TB-2 drone strike in the vicinity of the #Kherson bridge"
"#Ukraine: Another Russian Tor-M1 SAM system was destroyed by a Ukrainian TB-2 drone strike in the vicinity of the #Kherson bridge"
Apparently it was a punitive strike against the downtown of the city
NSFW
"Mariupol footage from AZOV"
Maybe just rations for refugee and expandables for field hospitals... sure that Russian will buy stuff from China, they do it all years long like all other nations. Ukraine are probably buying too.
With viccinity of combat, civilians will be hurt. Just a defect could cause a rocket to steer away from target anyway.
I think the western rumours of Russia asking for Chinese aid are a way out for them to stop providing military hardware to Ukraine.
At this point anything they're sending in is ending up straight into the hands of the Russians. They aren't getting paid for any of this, and must be running dangerously low on some platforms. It makes more sense to send them to Poland or the Baltics now, that way not only will they be going to regular army units instead of civilian militia, they can also get paid for it.
Russia threatening to target western supplies in the Ukraine could lead to a bigger humanitarian disaster, as many are using civilian vehicles to do so.
I think by first claiming China is about to send in military hardware they then announce an agreement with China that neither side will provide military aid to either country.
At this point anything they're sending in is ending up straight into the hands of the Russians. They aren't getting paid for any of this, and must be running dangerously low on some platforms. It makes more sense to send them to Poland or the Baltics now, that way not only will they be going to regular army units instead of civilian militia, they can also get paid for it.
Russia threatening to target western supplies in the Ukraine could lead to a bigger humanitarian disaster, as many are using civilian vehicles to do so.
I think by first claiming China is about to send in military hardware they then announce an agreement with China that neither side will provide military aid to either country.
I wouldn't put it past the Ukrainians to deliberately aim for the city, they have doing so for the last 8 years, and now they have the support of the western media so nothing will happen to them.
The article provides no compelling reason to cut Putin off except "Don't have US sanctions imposed on China" which I somewhat understand BUT the author seems to forget how China routinely trades with sanctioned states like Iran and North Korea, and avoid retailiatory US sanctions. There are significant loopholes to Western sanctions on Russia that China can exploit to prevent total economic collapse.
The article naively suggest China's reputation is harmed by neutrality. Yes, maybe amongst Western imperialist nations, but neutrality is the correct position to take, since both sides are engaged in different degrees of imperialism if we want to objective, fair, and impartial. Both sides are imperialistic, so China should remain neutral, but lean towards Russia since it's the weaker imperialist aligned with China's interests.
It's also supremely naive to thing US will drop it's anti-China mentality if it joins in anti-Russian crusade. Yes, Russia's actions is imperialistic, but that's not China's problem to fix, the mess was created by Western countries. China isn't obligated to toe Western line to fix the mess West created and help kill it's strategic partner out of some faux outrage on "muh internation law!!" which US routinely ignores.
- Status