UK Military News, Reports, Data, etc.

IMO the sinking of HMS Sheffield and Coventry, the British emphasized the AAW capabilities on its surface vessels more than any other countries in the world, and Daring class was built with that in mind. The multi-role task was given to the Type 26, which is larger and capable of more roles than its predecessor, the Type 23.

Nicely put, ToxicStar, BUT if a Type 45 destroyer detects an enemy submarine, a helicopter will hopefully be sent to engage it, BUT if a Type 45 destroyer detects a hostile enemy ship, then what?
 

ToxicStar

New Member
Nicely put, ToxicStar, BUT if a Type 45 destroyer detects an enemy submarine, a helicopter will hopefully be sent to engage it, BUT if a Type 45 destroyer detects a hostile enemy ship, then what?

Note that four of the Type 45 is equipped with Harpoon missiles, so it is still capable of engaging enemy surface vessels by itself. In reality. I believe that British is going to operate Type 45 alongside with Type 23 or Type 26 in combat situation, and the chance of it being alone is slim to none.

On the day when HMS Coventry was sunk, it was operating along with HMS Braodsword, a Type 22 frigate. The idea behind this formation is for the two ships to compensate each other's strength and weakness: Coventry to use its long range radar to detect and engage any incoming Argentine aircraft with Sea dart at long range , and let Broadsword's Sea Wolf to cover the mid/short range air defense. Despite the fact that Coventry still got overwhelmed and sunk by Argentine fighters in the end, it and Broadsword still brought down more Argentine aircraft than any other ships in the British task force.

So, my guess is that if a Type 45 destroyer detects a hostile enemy ship, the task of engaging enemy ship is most likely to be passed on to other ships operating along with it, while Type 45 focuses on AAW or ASW.
 
Last edited:

A.Man

Major
Type-45, D32 is in Shanghai China

9mue.jpg


my7i.jpg


vogx.jpg
 

Jeff Head

General
Registered Member
Note that four of the Type 45 is equipped with Harpoon missiles, so it is still capable of engaging enemy surface vessels by itself.

Toxic, the Type 45, Daring Class was fitted for, but not equipped with, Harpoon missiles. This means they are capable of adding them at a later date, but did not have them added when built, launched, and commissioned

I know that in August 2013 (a little over 3 months ago) it was announced that four of the six Type 45 destroyers would receive Harpoon launchers from some of the decommissioned Type 22 frigates...but to date, that has not happened. All of them have been launched and are in service, but none of them carry Harpoons at this time. We will have to wait and see if they actually add them to those four. I hope they do, it would increase their multi-role capability and add more flexibility to the Royal Navy's planning.

So, to emphasize, right now there is no anti-ship missile attack capability on the Daring Class Destroyers. To this point, there is also no land-attack cruise missile capability either. They are pretty much dedicated to Anti-air fleet defense role. With a Merlin helicopter, they do have a stand-off ASW capability, but the Type 23 FFGs are the real ASW work horses in the fleet, and I expect the Type 26 GCS will be equally strong in that regard.

Type-45, D32 is in Shanghai China

my7i.jpg
OUSTANDING pics, A.Mann!

Keep 'em coming.
 

Equation

Lieutenant General
9mue.jpg


There was a report on CCTV about this Royal Navy Type-45, D32 visiting in Shanghai and it showed that top round/oval shape radar spinning and it was pretty cool to see.
 

TerraN_EmpirE

Tyrant King
9mue.jpg


There was a report on CCTV about this Royal Navy Type-45, D32 visiting in Shanghai and it showed that top round/oval shape radar spinning and it was pretty cool to see.

Why do I imagine some kid on the bridge begging the commander to turn on the spinner radar?
 
Top