Pointblank
Senior Member
Re: Type 95 assault rifle
This is incorrect.
There is no plan for the US to replace the existing NATO compliant 5.56mm weapons in favour of 6.8mm weapons. This would require going back to NATO and trying to find consensus for a adoption of a new calibre.
Instead, the US is upgrading the existing weapons, and issuing the new MK262 Mod 0 round, which is more lethal than the current SS109 or M855 round. This round was originally designed for the M-16 derived marksman weapons as a longer range, more accurate round.
Yesterday I was watching the Future Weapons show, and they said that US would gradually phase out all the current assault rifles using 5.56*45mm bullets because these shells didn't have stopping power. Instead, they will phase in Robinson Armanents XCR assault rifle using caliber 6.8*43mm. This type of rifle is the best that they have ever made because of its reliability. The internal design of this rifle is very similar to HK 416 assault rifle by directing all the gasses away from the internal components of the gun. My question is why China went from 7.62 down to 5.8mm while US will go from 5.56 to 6.8mm. Does 6.8 actually have more stopping power than 5.8mm because it has more kinetic energy? Any Ideas?
This is incorrect.
There is no plan for the US to replace the existing NATO compliant 5.56mm weapons in favour of 6.8mm weapons. This would require going back to NATO and trying to find consensus for a adoption of a new calibre.
Instead, the US is upgrading the existing weapons, and issuing the new MK262 Mod 0 round, which is more lethal than the current SS109 or M855 round. This round was originally designed for the M-16 derived marksman weapons as a longer range, more accurate round.