No disrespect but I'll see you eat these words within the next two or three weeks, lol
Well then I'll be patiently waiting the coming 3 weeks to be proven wrong. Until then, what I've said still remains accurate.
And it doesn't have to compete with what the others come up with, it is developed to meet Turkey's own requirements and is developed in accordance with their own financial and technical abilities. Also, comparing a country the size of Turkey with the likes of two great superpowers shows how ignorant you are.
Fighter jets, especially stealth fighters, needs to be competitive with it's peers in order to not remain at a disadvantage. So yes, they do need to compete with others, or else what's the point of a 5th Gen if it isn't competitive with other 5th Gens?
It does provide valuable experience developing fighters like such. But the experience is ultimately contributing to creating and refining the product as best as it can be anyways. You don't learn because you don't want to win. You learn because you want to be competitive, right?
How is comparison ignorant now? Or are you getting defensive? I don't see why the comparison would be invalid, as all of them are working towards the same thing: a capable 5th Gen fighter.
You're a new member here and everything you've wrote so far on different topics displays your lack of respect and knowledge so you should first observe a bit and then come up with your own conclusions. I mean, isn't that the wise thing to do? First inform yourself a bit, do some research and then talk big.
Also, isn't this behaviour considered trolling and derailing the topic?
I could be misinterpreting, but are you trying to undermine my credibility by saying I'm a new member and do not make any contributions? False aside, that's a classic example of ad hominem. I pointed out a questionable aspect, and was immediately attacked by you.
I inform any notable news from Weibo, or any Chinese outlets that haven't reached here yet, as I know the language. Things such as new photos like the J-35, videos such as the J-20A one, etc. I also point out some inaccuracies here and there.
Calling me 'displaying a lack of knowledge' is quite amusing. I do admit I'm still young in some aspects, but I do very much observe, refute, and learn. And I dare say I'm fairly well-informed, at least compared to the general public.
I never talked big, only pointed out the fact that none of the bells and whistles in the PPT slide you replied my comment with from another thread are real yet. Perhaps you should wait until they are more mature, then you can talk big.
I see you have great pride for your country. I do respect it, but cockiness isn't respectable.
Please note that none of my comments are with a malicious intent to undermine a country's progress. I'm merely scrutinizing what are the actual capabilities in contrast to what's claimed. If I did offended you, I do apologize as it's not my intention.
I did not derail the topic.
@sequ replied to me, and I merely questioned how real it is. And trolling, by definition, is to deliberately upset someone. That is NOT my intention. I pointed out it IS still a PPT, and Turkey is still behind, with an active effort to catch up. My wording is completely honest with no malicious intention, and I consider them factually correct.
This has nothing to do with the current stage of the program though. My reasoning for his post being derailing is that there wasn't a prior discussion about it today but he came and wrote something totally unrelated and also provocative. I can see from his previous posts about other topics that he does neither much research nor writes informative things either.
In my book and many others', that's considered at least derailing/non-topic and maybe trolling. But his intention is obvious for everyone to see. The same kind of posts on other threads get deleted all the time yet not on this thread. I think the same kind of rules and moderation should be applied here also.
Isn't that a fair suggestion?
And all I'm asking him is to read a bit before coming to a conclusion. It's obvious he doesn't follow this topic.
Again, I came because someone replied to me, and I questioned the actuality of the features shown. It's not unrelated, and I do accidently provoke people a lot. So for that I once again apologize.
You keep accusing me for not doing research, but without evidence. On the other hand, in my TWR calculations I did do research, and in other posts too. Are you sure you're not too biased?
I've already shown I am indeed (at least somewhat) informative. Your accusations are invalid and empty.
Well, IMO it is provocative but IMO he's correct: Kaan IS STILL a prototype yet and even if it will fly within the next weeks, no-one needs to "eat these words" since even then and as long as the engine issue is not solved, it remains a prototype and testbed at best.
That all has NOTHING TO DO with lack of respect or even disrespect, but a lot of experience and the fear that a fighter of this size and complexity has actually simply been taken over: And in general, once again: criticism or skepticism has nothing to do with a lack of respect, but it is common for the newcomer to have to prove what he can actually do - especially after all the loud announcements - and not the other way around. And even a successful first flight won't change that at all. It was also a long way from the YF-22 to the F-22A, the EAP to the Eurofighter or the Rafale-T to the production model.
As such Kaan, as magnificent and promising as it may be ... is still a prototype today; nothing more.
Provocation was not part of my intent, only questioning and scrutinizing. The vapor comment was only for emphasizing my view, but in hindsight, it could be seen as provocative. I'm not great at sugarcoating my questions and observations. I do apologize. And your last sentence is what I'm reiterating.
I'll refrain from defending myself anymore unless absolutely required to avoid going completely off-topic of this thread. But please do keep in mind that people scrutinizing and voicing skepticism does not equal disrespect or an intent to provoke.
I rest my case.