Remnants of the previous power balance when American power was undeniably dominant. People listen to the dominant hard power. China has an advantage influencing its own people, of course, but that advantage has to be balanced against the American advantage of globally dominant power, so the effect achieved was that some Chinese became liberalized while most were protected.
Yes it did; you just lacked the common sense to understand.This still doesn't answer the question.
Information is not sealed away by the local government, right? People can see and read things that creep through the censors. People can get paid and corrupted into spreading enemy propaganda within one's one country, right? The US can pay and train Chinese spies to go back into China and spread its propaganda, right? People can hop the firewall to read things online, right? This is common sense, didn't even think I'd need to tell you.This can only explain Chinese people being influenced by foreign media located outside of China's borders.
It cannot explain the success of foreign psyops within China's borders, which you falsely claimed was "easy for a nation to stop with hard power".
We can discuss the rest later. Just address this point first.
Yes it did; you just lacked the common sense to understand.
Information is not sealed away by the local government, right? People can see and read things that creep through the censors. People can get paid and corrupted into spreading enemy propaganda within one's one country, right? The US can pay and train Chinese spies to go back into China and spread its propaganda, right? People can hop the firewall to read things online, right? This is common sense, didn't even think I'd need to tell you.
It's simple. China's hard power is still not enough to contend against the US in all domains.You contradict yourself.
First you say hard power can stop soft power attacks easily within a nation's borders...
Now, you agree with me and admit that hard power cannot stop soft power within a nation's borders easily.
No, you just can't fathom different hard powers working against each other.You contradict yourself.
Hard power control within one's borders presents an asymetric advantage against foreign hard power attempting to gain control of your people. What spread into China is not soft power at all; they were the nonviolent extensions of hard power. Everything I listed above that the US did relied on its hard power through funding and technology.First you say hard power can stop soft power attacks easily within a nation's borders...
No, I don't agree with you. You thought I did because you don't even know what is hard power. You think funding terrorists, training spies is soft power? You think money and technology are soft power? No wonder you think that shit is important LOL You are under the common misconception that hard power is military force and soft power is everything else. That's a very low level mistake.Now, you agree with me and admit that hard power cannot stop soft power within a nation's borders easily.
Soft power is defined as the ability to coerce without military force or economic transactions.All those three talking points are literally some of your main talking points. You and your cheerleaders keep repeating this nonsense over and over despite it being shown to be wrong.
hArD PoWeR CaN StOp sOfT PoWeR EaSiLy wItHiN ThEiR OwN BoRdErS.
Explain why the west was able to run psyops all over China and STILL did until usaid pulled funding. It doesn't matter if America had more hard power since China is controlled by Chinese people. According to your own claim, Chinese control should be able to kill any foreign psyops within their borders.
Creating an app like XHS takes technological prowess and that only allows Americans to see what China is like. They fell on China's side because they marvelled at how beautiful and technologically advanced our society is and how powerful our economy is in protecting our citizens' power as consumers. Many countries around the world with lesser economies could not control the inflation and the people became poor when the global economy shook. China protected its citizens from that. This is China's hard power, nothing soft here.Soft power is defined as the ability to coerce without military force or economic transactions.
Paying fake news propagandists is literally hard power.
There is indeed soft power but that is shit like religion and ideology. You might have seen it on XHS. Did China pay millions of Americans to use the app and expose real conditions in the US? Did China threaten them with J-20? Exactly.
Support for China isn't tied to being paid to support China or being threatened to support China. That is true soft power.
True but XHS had no business with the US and it is neither the largest nor a technically innovative app. It is a decent app with a moderate user base.Creating an app like XHS takes technological prowess and that only allows Americans to see what China is like. They fell on China's side because they marvelled at how beautiful and technologically advanced our society is and how powerful our economy is in protecting our citizens' power as consumers. This is China's hard power, nothing soft here.