Trump 2.0 official thread
- Thread starter siegecrossbow
- Start date
I think the NYPost disabled comments lmao
Pretty sure this is not AI so yeah...
This is like the US version of perestroika lol, some radical changes coming.
Musk is going to do some major damage. The thing is DOGE is a bit of a self-fulfilling prophecy, it was created to identify inefficiency, obviously it is going to brand every department as inefficient. when you have a hammer everything looks like a nail so the saying goes.
If Musk does survive in the Trump administration for a couple of years, he will have created a lot of dissent, while completely tarnishing the federal government. historically, late-stage empires try to identify its problems and attempt to rectify it with some radical reforms. Those efforts typically results in an acceleration of their decline.
No, they can't. They have neither the independent U enrichment capability nor the reprocessing capability.
Enrichment outside Russia, China EU and US is a rounding error.
Regular reactors can't produce WGP and Japan's only breeder failed within 3 months of operation (began August 1995, failed December). It took them 15 years to repair, and failed again within 3 months (repaired May 2010, failed August). It was then scrapped.
This reminds me of an event: the Copenhagen Climate Conference(COP15).
——Many people on the forum should be familiar with this cartoon character.
Its original novel was completed very early and selected an important landmark event, which is the Copenhagen Climate Conference.
The original author sees this event as a sign of the US losing its dominance in international affairs for the first time. And to this day, we can see the profound impact of this conference on international relations.
So will Trump claim sovereignty over Taiwan? I mean, how far off from that are we?
manqiangrexue
Brigadier
America should never be underestimated; it's being beaten but it's still dangerous. That said, it shouldn't be overestimated and made to look 10 feet tall either.
American sanctions were slow and ineffective because that's just how the country moves and it also tried to protect its own industries from the shock. Anything left that America hasn't sanctioned it's because they are too vulnerable or know it wouldn't work. It would basically throw away its market and cede it to Chinese competitors immediately. So yeah, we would like that.
China has missiles that can one-shot American carriers; never forget about those.
Why would our tone change for an American missile build-up? China builds everything faster and better. Our tone would be to just stay with the plan of beating them at every military tech and the out-building them. Japan and SK getting nukes? Would they even dare use them, with so little land for when China counters?
Who's laughing? All the previously rich countries bleeding themselves poor to prop up an Ukraine that is still losing territory to Russia?
That's war. It allows Russia to test its own weapons and the weapons of its enemies and share data with China. Russia has over 140m people.
Gaining territory by the day while draining Russia's enemies, buying time for China and stalling Western resources from the real hegemonic fight.
Russia has the strongest economy in Europe right now.
1. That's your imagination
2. If so, then the war really benefits Russia while hurting NATO, doesn't it? Seems like wonderful Russian strategy to me to start and continue this war... by your logic.
Trump dismantle NATO? He's done a lot of things, pulled out of a lot of organizations but this I've never heard of. Can you link it? And by your logic, Russia should want as much support and as the West can manage in Ukraine because they just get quagmired into it while Russia's wartime economy steams on. It's better for Russia and its contribution to the Sino-Russian alliance.
At least it ain't the imaginary chess you're playing with yourself.
So in fact Trump and Pelosi have more in common than either cares to admit!
It would be interesting to see which investment strategy would get the best returns - Trump v Pelosi v Inverse Jim Cramer.
