Trade War with China

Status
Not open for further replies.

s002wjh

Junior Member
National fiber optic communication network is used by the military, banking system, government agencies etc. All of them are strategic importance no less than oil. Remember Snowden's revelation? Give you another hint, three (or four) years ago I heard a colleague from China saying that all telecom trunk routers (from Cisco) in her province were replaced by Chinese made routers without American processors, so you should know that a chip is no less critical as a barrel of crude oil. Rice or wheel seeds are even more critical than oil.

see my previous post. again its gone back to whether CCP directly support it or its a company decision. also do you have list on what ZTE sold to Iran, smartphone or actually iran network infrastructure.
 

taxiya

Brigadier
Registered Member
Yes ZTE has state shareholders and it's likely some one in ZTE want to make $$$ and take high risk. I don't buy that CCP ask ZTE purposely created shell companies to sell stuff to Iran for geo strategy purpose . for what get Iranian to have wireless network and smartphones? Is there articles to prove that .
ZTE is not in Iran just to sell mobile phones and wireless network. It built Iran's national fiber optic cable network for the Iranian state.
 

taxiya

Brigadier
Registered Member
see my previous post. again its gone back to whether CCP directly support it or its a company decision. also do you have list on what ZTE sold to Iran, smartphone or actually iran network infrastructure.
Are you demanding me to provide "red-head" document to you? I am not your spy.;) Try it yourself.

However I mistaken Huawei with ZTE. Huawei was the one reported to build the fiber network. But not much difference.

[edit], just realized, isn't wireless network itself a "infrastructure" as much as fiber network? After all, all civilians, military people, banking people and government people use it everywhere.
 
Last edited:

manqiangrexue

Brigadier
i'm not talking about the purpose of the sanction but did ZTE violate the sanction due to its own greed or its back up by CCP. if its latter do you have prove on it, if not its really just conspiracy theory.
if its not due to CCP order, then its a company decision due to greed. The risk outweight the gain. if thats the case its not US vs China, but a company decision.
However, now it become a China/US trade issue due to US ban ZTE purchasing parts and upcoming deal etc.
I can't prove it with secret documents man. But to me, it's pretty clear that it's not a matter of greed. The US imposed a $1.2 billion fine on ZTE. ZTE's entire profit in 2017 was $720 million USD (
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
). Then, ZTE decided to REWARD the employees involved for a job well one selling to Iran while losing the company more than 18 months of total profit. Using math and logic, does it look to you like it's a matter of money? If you still think so, then we'll just agree to disagree.
 
Last edited:

s002wjh

Junior Member
Are you demanding me to provide "red-head" document to you? I am not your spy.;) Try it yourself.

However I mistaken Huawei with ZTE. Huawei was the one reported to build the fiber network. But not much difference.

[edit], just realized, isn't wireless network itself a "infrastructure" as much as fiber network? After all, all civilians, military people, banking people and government people use it everywhere.

Like i said unless someone prove that ZTE/Huawei was under CCP order to sell equipment to IRAN, otherwise its solely company decision for making $$$. I just dont see CCP gain anything to counter US by selling network equipment to IRAN? other than $$ and establish good relationship with Iran for future project. There is no geo-political only economy gain.
 
Last edited:

s002wjh

Junior Member
I can't prove it with secret documents man. But to me, it's pretty clear that it's not a matter of greed. The US imposed a $1.2 billion fine on ZTE. ZTE's entire profit in 2017 was $720 million USD (
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
). Then, ZTE decided to REWARD the employees involved for a job well one selling to Iran while losing the company more than 18 months of total profit. Using math and logic, does it look to you like it's a matter of money? If you still think so, then we'll just agree to disagree.
US probably intentionally put $1.2B to scare other potential company that may do business in IRAN, kind like kill the chicken to scare the monkey. As for employees involved in it, i remember GM doing bad financially in 2000's, the fed save them, yet the CEO got huge bonus. That kind of thing happen with alot company, the CEO/senior staff always get bonus even when things go bad. But we dont know whats going on within ZTE so i wont guess.
 

manqiangrexue

Brigadier
US probably intentionally put $1.2B to scare other potential company that may do business in IRAN, kind like kill the chicken to scare the monkey. As for employees involved in it, i remember GM doing bad financially in 2000's, the fed save them, yet the CEO got huge bonus. That kind of thing happen with alot company, the CEO/senior staff always get bonus even when things go bad. But we dont know whats going on within ZTE so i wont guess.
When the GM CEOs got huge bonuses, 1. the company's decline was not attributed specifically to thier stupid mistakes, and 2. there was no deal specifying that THESE PEOPLE need to be punished to avoid further damage to the company. Basically, GM's decline was a matter of everyone doing their best, no obvious mistakes, but it didn't work out, which is not ZTE's situation.

The ZTE higher ups purposefully broke contracts, causing more than a year's profit to be fined and the result was that, they were rewarded. And you still think ZTE's all about money and anything else you won't guess? In other words, the purpose is to make money, so you reward the people who nearly deliberately lost you $1.2 billion and that makes sense to you? LOL OK then I guess that's where you're at. Nobody else here is on the same page as you though.

For me, the default position of an SOE is not profit; the default position is to advance Chinese interests, develop national technology, and follow the orders of the government. For me, this is the assumed primary goal of an SOE's actions unless there is proof otherwise.
 
Last edited:

taxiya

Brigadier
Registered Member
Like i said unless someone prove that ZTE/Huawei was under CCP order to sell equipment to IRAN, otherwise its solely company decision for making $$$. I just dont see CCP gain anything to counter US by selling network equipment to IRAN? other than $$ and establish good relationship with Iran for future project. There is no geo-political only economy gain.
Is that the center of your thought? for that the answer is simple. Network equipment is as strategic as oil, without it the country will be in 19th century. So the gain for China is to prop up a strategic partner in west Asia? To gain influence in the region? To push back the US penetration into the OBOR center? To feed the US its own medicine of ignoring China's protest by selling weapon to Taiwan? What would US gain by selling weapon to Taiwan? If you can answer that, then you certainly will get the answer.

As of the "showing you the order", do you need an written order for your right hand to put the spun into your mouth? Or if I ask you to prove that it is actually your head ordered your hand to feed your mouth, will you call me crazy? ZTE is 100% owned by the government like your hand is fully controlled by your head.

Seriously, by now I have said everything and probably I have repeated myself many times, if you still don't get it you will never get it. I give up on you.:(
 

vincent

Grumpy Old Man
Staff member
Moderator - World Affairs
ZTE was selling parts with US parts in it to Iran then lie about it that was the issue. you sound like because someone cheat on exam got caught because he got sloppy where the real issues is he shouldn't cheat in the 1st place.

Do cheaters get death sentences?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top