Hendrik_2000
Lieutenant General
I have to disagree that tech companies will ditch one SoC for another just to aid China in achieving "independence". The ban only applies to ZTE and hence we will continue to observe a dependency on foreign chips from other companies. I highly doubt that a company is willing to jeopardize the competitiveness of their products just so they could domesticate the chip industry. Additionally, the US ban is in place for only seven years, so unless a Chinese supplier can develop and produce a SoC that is more capable and much less costly than their foreign counterparts within that timespan, it is quite unlikely that it would jumpstart China's homegrown chip industry the same way a complete arms embargo had forced the rise of China's MIC.
The Kirin 970 is faster, but please take a look at the other components of the benchmarks:
The Kirin 970, as compared to the Snapdragon 845 and the Samsung Exynos 9810:
- Has a lower frame generation speed
- Inferior GPU
- Slower max download speed
- Unknown camera support
If Huawei or another Chinese vendor were so successful in producing in-house SoCs, we would've seen them flood the Chinese smartphone market already.
You are getting in nitty gritty and you only highlight the minus part of Kirin without adding the plus part. There are many reviewer this guy isonly one of them even he conced they are all good Here is the oveall assesment of the 3 Soc
If we take into consideration the Android smartphones market, Samsung Exynos 9810, Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 and Kirin 970 are the best processors ever announced in the past few months. Exynos 9810 will power the upcoming in its European version, Kirin 970 is aboard and and it will also be aboard the Huawei P20,
The difference between 3 are very very minor it come down to preferrence and bias
Huawei just has implemented the Kirin 970 on many of their handset so they are independent of qualcomm now It is still new chip so they have to ramp up the production but it will there soon