The War in the Ukraine

Pmichael

Junior Member
I'm Canadian why would I be butthurt about what's going on at the other side of the world? My point was, if this was my operation they would pay dearly for every single strike. And it seems to be turning that way, with missile strikes across Ukraine once again this morning.

Fuck around and find out would be my modus operandi

You should reduce your emotional attachment, attacking civilian targets in the recent days was a net loss for Russia. All those weapons fired would have been used better against actual military targets. In that video you quoted Ukraine was actually capable of attacking something on an airfield, this is a way more logical target with a potential meaningful impact than wasting your missiles on civilian infrastructure and targets.
 
Last edited:

Sinnavuuty

Senior Member
Registered Member
You should reduce your emotional attachment, attacking civilian targets in the recent days was a net loss for Russia. All those weapons fired would have been used better against actual military targets. In that video you quoted Ukraine was actually capable of attacking something on an airfield, this is a way more logical target with a potential meaningful impact than wasting your missiles on civilian infrastructure and targets.
I agree. That's why the AFU should follow his advice and stop targeting residential areas in Belgorod and especially Donbas and target real military targets.
 

2handedswordsman

Junior Member
Registered Member
I think if Russia gets Iranian SSM Ukraine will get ATACMS. Now whether they can use ATACMS against Russia proper is another thing but US looked the other way today as HARMS took out Russian IADS in Belgorod.
Why you say looked the other way? It's a war, they know that HARMS are handed to Ukraine and anytime a HARM can hit a Russian asset. What they can do about it? The checkmate is to go full on and topple Zelensky regime. And guess what, all these western weapons, supplies etc that are being handed to Ukraine not for free but with loans of big interest, will have not any legal legitimacy to be repaid. Who is to loose big?

*lol sorry i read your comment diagonally and i misunderstood what you've said, but the point i set still remains ontopic :)
 
Last edited:

sheogorath

Major
Registered Member
They didn't strike Belgorod airfield they took out its IADS the same IADS that downed two Ukraine fighters one of them being a SU-24.
According to who?.

The S300 around Belgorod outrange the HARM in most aspects, let alone a HARM lobbied blindly into the general direction of anything.

You should reduce your emotional attachment, attacking civilian targets in the recent days was a net loss for Russia. All those weapons fired would have been used better against actual military targets. In that video you quoted Ukraine was actually capable of attacking something on an airfield, this is a way more logical target with a potential meaningful impact than wasting your missiles on civilian infrastructure and targets.

That's just cope. One of the first thing NATO strikes whenever they go on a "defensive" operation is dual use infrastructure, from bridges to powerplants, rail yards, to radio and tv stations.

Damaging powerplants and substations puts a dampen on Ukraines hability to move things around, it also forces them to deviate fuel to power generators and manpower for manteinance.
 
Last edited:

s002wjh

Junior Member
Please provide relevant commentary and thoughtful analysis to accompany posts.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Top