The Russia is in the position it is due to that man. Even his comments about the war betray that fact
For such a serious matter as a war, he is quite relaxed and treating it like a game, r/WhatCouldGoWrong.
Sun Tzu would be (not) proud:
The War in the Ukraine
- Thread starter SampanViking
- Start date
Sun Tzu would be (not) proud:
I'm sorry, where is it that you read these points? This is the most mind numbingly stupid thing I've ever read, i thought people should have wisened up to implementing stupid, unenforceable terms such as 'demilitarisation' and 'force cap' without a full military occupation.
Nukes would sooner fly than 'withdraw all military force to the east of Urals'.
That sounds like genocide.
No, if it's "de-Nazification" then civilian infrastructure focused strikes are perfectly fine. I mean it is, but you can't really frame it as liberation or special military operation anymore. If you're just striking infrastructure without a plan to push into the territory after then it really is just terror bombing.
Interesting analysis of the current strategic situation in Ukraine by Lt. Gen Ben Hodges.
Some interesting tidbits: Ukraine has at least 700,000 (!) men in uniform. They are getting trained in UK, Germany and Poland and have ample capacity to recruit 100,000s more. Russian Iskander is 70% built by imported components and will be difficult to replenish.
He believes Ukraine has a good chance of rolling back Russia to the Feb 23 borders by the end of the year. Furthermore, he believes it is extremely unlikely that Russia would use nuclear weapons in Ukraine. The main argument for that claim is that costs for Russia would far outweigh the “benefits”. The US could nit afford to stand by and not get involved at that point. For example, the Russian naval base in Syria may be destroyed, or the Russian fleet in the Black Sea sunk or even the Russian forces within Ukraine degraded by F-35 strikes.
Some interesting tidbits: Ukraine has at least 700,000 (!) men in uniform. They are getting trained in UK, Germany and Poland and have ample capacity to recruit 100,000s more. Russian Iskander is 70% built by imported components and will be difficult to replenish.
He believes Ukraine has a good chance of rolling back Russia to the Feb 23 borders by the end of the year. Furthermore, he believes it is extremely unlikely that Russia would use nuclear weapons in Ukraine. The main argument for that claim is that costs for Russia would far outweigh the “benefits”. The US could nit afford to stand by and not get involved at that point. For example, the Russian naval base in Syria may be destroyed, or the Russian fleet in the Black Sea sunk or even the Russian forces within Ukraine degraded by F-35 strikes.
Last edited:
What would they do? Staging massive naked protest?
And the bases west have over there & nearby will be showered with flowers.
Yea sure, they can destroy Russian fleets at video games. I'm pretty sure when it happens on ground, West will be erased off existence. I would love to see they do one single thing they mouth-fart about.
It's not genocide if the other country starts it.
It just becomes terror bombing depending on who does it. Ukranians keep shelling city centers as collective punishment, just like they have been doing since 2014 with little to no intention to push, but it has never been calles terror bombings.
At least hitting infrastructure still affects Ukraine fighting capacity including their offensives, one way or the other.