Attacking to defend democracy is considered defensive, thus no rules need to be followedRemember that whole story about an attacking force needing a 3:1 advantage against defenders? Is that advantage present in Kherson or do Ukrainians not need it because they're defending DEMOCRACY!?
The Russians yesterday were mobilizing bridges for the Kherson region, they probably know that the Ukrainians will try to disable all fixed access bridges
“We are determined to help the people of eastern Ukraine to liberate themselves from the burden of this absolutely unacceptable regime,” Lavrov said
Regime change in Kiev is entirely feasible, plus installing a pro-Russian successor to Zelensky will resolve Russia's security concerns about NATO troops/equipment/proxy on Russia's direct border. Perhaps Zelensky steps down or assassinated by pro-Russian military coup, his head served on a platter to Putin. Either way, this is a worthwhile objective since NATO has defacto declared mini-WW3 against Russia (via proxy), so Russia should eliminate this proxy once and for all. Any territorial annexation is icing-on-the-cake and superfluous since Russia has enough territory to begin with. It's purely about Security architecture of Europe and whether Ukraine is within Russian sphere of influence or not, not even about territorial annexations or even Donbass dispute.Lavrov said: “We will certainly help the Ukrainian people to get rid of the regime, which is absolutely anti-people and anti-historical.”
Oh wow. I didn't realize my grammatical error.And Russia AD are not actively targeting HIMARS missiles heading towards them.
Throughout this war, we've seen that Russians eventually react to changes in the battlefield. All they need now are more drones (possibly from Iran) to improve their strikes.
The CIA and the MI6 estimate Russian casualties at 15.000, well below Ukraine's claim of +35.000, though admit its mostly guesswork because the lower and higher ends of the estimates are so wide they are largely irrelevant
Then they go off to try and compare the US casualty rate during colonial policing in Afghanistan and Iraq with that of a war like Ukraine's then admit the US wouldn't do that well, either, even against North Korea
“The number of people that are upset and have low morale has increased, and that’s partly because of the way the Russians have chosen to fight,” Ripley Rawlings, a retired U.S. Marine Corps lieutenant colonel and author, who is providing supplies to foreign fighters in Ukraine through his U.S.-based organization, Ripley’s Heroes, said.
Wouldn't take their numbers at face value. The other day I saw a report that US side admitted they are reluctant to report on those numbers not only cuz it is hard to get accurate figures but also the true numbers might cause further demoralizing.The CIA and the MI6 estimate Russian casualties at 15.000, well below Ukraine's claim of +35.000, though admit its mostly guesswork because the lower and higher ends of the estimates are so wide they are largely irrelevant
Then they go off to try and compare the US casualty rate during colonial policing in Afghanistan and Iraq with that of a war like Ukraine's then admit the US wouldn't do that well, either, even against North Korea