The War in the Ukraine

lucretius

Junior Member
Registered Member
They repaired it the day and night before, putting reinforcement and pouring fast setting cement onto the holes. If you are familiar with aircraft runaways, there are special kits meant to do the same for repairing runaways after a bomb or missile attack. They also stationed some air defenses, so I would expect a number of missiles would be shot down while some would go through.
Here's a video of the attack. I count 9 distinct explosions?

I expect we will have a better idea in daylight tomorrow

 

RedMetalSeadramon

Junior Member
Registered Member
I'm no structural engineer either ,but it seems , in the immediate future, the Russians will be looking at pontoon bridges to ford the Dnieper in the Kherson area.


Simple
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
. Spans relatively short, 30-100 m or so each(counted about 20 spans from google maps, but some sections longer than others) so should hold for some time, entire bridge should not collapse as individual precasts must fail first.

The Russians should consider stockpiling
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
, or whatever their engineering equivalent nearby, be prepared to close up any spans that collapse. This will be much faster than bringing in boats and trying to pontoon

Bridge will be effective and remediable as long as the bridge columns stands.
 

zhangjim

Junior Member
Registered Member
The crew of the Russian air defense system "Buk" spoke about the confrontation with the American MLRS "HIMARS" in Ukraine. The goal is difficult, but the interception of HIMARS MLRS missiles in Ukraine has ceased to be a problem, Russian air defense crews have already gained experience in combating it.
I think this passive defense method will be very inefficient.
We have to admit that HIMAS is indeed a relatively effective weapon, but a large part of this needs to be attributed to the backwardness of Russian reconnaissance means.

There is no doubt that such weapons will be a major threat to Taiwan's military operations in the future.
 

Atomicfrog

Major
Registered Member
I think this passive defense method will be very inefficient.
We have to admit that HIMAS is indeed a relatively effective weapon, but a large part of this needs to be attributed to the backwardness of Russian reconnaissance means.

There is no doubt that such weapons will be a major threat to Taiwan's military operations in the future.
Static targets like bridges are pretty nice to shot with guided artillery. You can shot the round approximately and the guidance do the rest. Quite harder to find the launcher because the launch sequence is way shorter without precise aiming.

The Russian are a bit to slow in their progress and it's not the HIMARS that creating that situation but more a static battleground where reinforcements can reach the front. If Russian forces would have progressed 200km farther, HIMARS and artillery would be irrelevant to attack that bridge...
 
Last edited:

Atomicfrog

Major
Registered Member
The accuracy of the HIMARS is unquestionable, they have effectively disabled the bridge, without needing to destroy it completely...


The problems for the Russians increase in Kherson... The pontoon bridge parallel to the bridge will not be an option, it is still within range of the Ukrainian artillery.
Using bridge layer vehicule to fill gap could be an option without even repairing it, they would need to destroy the bridge columns stands.
 

Atomicfrog

Major
Registered Member
Apparently HIMARS is not responsible for this attack, these are 155mm arty strikes.

The frontline is simply too close.
In any case, with the frontline that close, standard unguided artillery can shot a well known and identified target of that size...
 
Top