It's not true.Apparently Kharkiv's defensive lines were actually mostly non-existant because the money provided for it was stolen
People always exaggerate impact of corruption. Things are always built. Corruption simply means that government pays more and final workers receive less, and money in the middle is stolen.It's not true.
The defenses are a bit deeper in Ukr. territory. It hasn't even been a week people. Let's not jump to conclusions or assessments.
In Ukraine's case, building trenches and filling them up with cannon fodder instead of negotiating a settlement, is corruption.People always exaggerate impact of corruption. Things are always built. Corruption simply means that government pays more and final workers receive less, and money in the middle is stolen.
This is the same in Ukraine, US, Spain, Germany, Russia, China or whatever you think.
Stuff is created, level of corruption only influence the over cost.
Ukraine tremendous corruption just mean a tremendous over cost, but Ukraine is not in lack of cash, receiving hundred thousand millions from US and UE.
It's not true.
The defenses are a bit deeper in Ukr. territory. It hasn't even been a week people. Let's not jump to conclusions or assessments.
People always exaggerate impact of corruption. Things are always built. Corruption simply means that government pays more and final workers receive less, and money in the middle is stolen.
This is the same in Ukraine, US, Spain, Germany, Russia, China or whatever you think.
Stuff is created, level of corruption only influence the over cost.
Ukraine tremendous corruption just mean a tremendous over cost, but Ukraine is not in lack of cash, receiving hundred thousand millions from US and UE.
I think Afghan Army is not a good example because it was a totally artificial creation of the US.Just like how corruption didn’t actually have any real world impacts on the much vaunted Afghan National Army right?
There are countless examples where money is spent and nothing of worth is delivered even in peacetime, never mind in a live war zone.
It’s truly breathtakingly naive boarding on the ridiculous to make such easily refuted wild claims that corruption just adds some cost and doesn’t have any real world delivery implications.
ka-29 belongs to the naval aviation.The choice of Ka-29 is kinda not optimum tbh.. especially with availability of Ka-52 that better suited for the task, with proper optics, radars, speed and electronic suites. The only issue was Russians really lacks Brimestone class Fire and forget weapon, which can allow simultaneous engagement of multiple targets. Thus maximizing use of the Arbalet radar.
The bette solution would be MALE or HALE UAV's or aircrafts as they provide much longer duration. But choice of weapons available remains the issues.
ka-29 belongs to the naval aviation.
the core problem here is interservice coordination - Russian VKS works in the interests of general staff and land war first and foremost; naval problems don't really concern them, even if they could've solved them on a whim.
VKS can and often does strike over the sea, but for their own goals.
Would be quite hard to shot small sea suicide drone with a Su-30, would need some dedicated weapons/targetting pod for the task.Doesn't the Navy have their own fleet of Su-30SM's?