Seems the larger FAB-1500's are using a more refined UMPK kit
Seems the larger FAB-1500's are using a more refined UMPK kit
I'm not convinced that suicide fpvs will be the answer. We've seen footage of those USVs in action, they are highly manuverable and most of it is underwater. Nothing short of a direct hit will be likely to destroy them as the water will absorb most of the impact.The Russians appear to be looking for solutions to the Ukrainian surface drone problem:
and this:
Torpedo nets and floating docks around mooring are nobrainer. At sea is a bit more complicated but in fast military ships, if you don't stop, how can they intercept and catch you ? Standing still in water is just plain stupid anyway.I'm not convinced that suicide fpvs will be the answer. We've seen footage of those USVs in action, they are highly manuverable and most of it is underwater. Nothing short of a direct hit will be likely to destroy them as the water will absorb most of the impact.
Use of Torpedo nets and Ship mounted ATGMs to cover blind spots seems more plausible.
Still looks industrial tho. But it works. The kit seems to increase the radar signature of the bomb by 70% As far as i see.
I was under the impression that most of the ships being hit and destroyed are indeed moving, just not fast enough to out run the jetskies. Were topedo nets able to achieve 100% coverage, what can a jetski actually do other than explode outside?Torpedo nets and floating docks around mooring is a nobrainer. At sea is a bit more complicated but in fast military ships, if you don't stop, how can they intercept and catch you ? Standing still in water is just plain stupid anyway.
If they are moving at slow pace... they are asking for it. Or Ukraine just leave the drone still on known ships path near ports and wait for them to go at sea ? Could be a possibility but they should be able to detect them with UAV or helicopter with IR for sure. Just embarassing.I was under the impression that most of the ships being hit and destroyed are indeed moving, just not fast enough to out run the jetskies. Were topedo nets able to achieve 100% coverage, what can a jetski actually do other than explode outside?
There are a variety of things the Russians could use.The Russians appear to be looking for solutions to the Ukrainian surface drone problem:
and this:
Does Ukraine have anything capable of intercepting them, though?. This seems to kind of outside Patriot's scope and I'm not sure how capable is NASAMS with regards to intercepting ammunition.
IRIS-T seems more up to the task.
I'm not convinced that suicide fpvs will be the answer. We've seen footage of those USVs in action, they are highly manuverable and most of it is underwater. Nothing short of a direct hit will be likely to destroy them as the water will absorb most of the impact.
Use of Torpedo nets and Ship mounted ATGMs to cover blind spots seems more plausible.