Boy the Russians sure are dumb. Given the EU's defense policy plus the fact that most EU members are in NATO, Ukraine in the EU would be the same thing as them being in NATO.1) There is Arachamia interview that confirmed that during Istanbul peace talks main Russian demand was neutral status for Ukraine (not joining NATO, but Russia was ok with Ukraine joining EU). One of the main reason that deal had died was due to Boris Johnson visit to Kiev. The whole thing was received badly by Ukrainian public, because losses during this year were massive and situation are even worse than year ago.
Here it is straight from Article 42 of the Treaty on European Union:
7. If a Member State is the victim of armed aggression on its territory, the other Member States shall have towards it an obligation of aid and assistance by all the means in their power, in accordance with Article 51 of the United Nations Charter. This shall not prejudice the specific character of the security and defence policy of certain Member States.
There is also this:
1. The common security and defence policy shall be an integral part of the common foreign and security policy. It shall provide the Union with an operational capacity drawing on civilian and military assets. The Union may use them on missions outside the Union for peace-keeping, conflict prevention and strengthening international security in accordance with the principles of the United Nations Charter. The performance of these tasks shall be undertaken using capabilities provided by the Member States.
This clause is vague enough that the EU could just start a war with someone as long as they framed it as a preventative war. Just like the Russians are doing in Ukraine. i.e. the Russians are claiming they are protecting the Russian speaking population of Ukraine, and ensuring their own safety.
Last edited: