The War in the Ukraine

Cult Icon

Junior Member
Registered Member
What a disaster.

A Western army would launch airmobile assault forces into the rear of the AFU(always carried out in areas weakly or not defended by the enemy), carry out artillery attacks, then descend infantry landing forces(always within artillery range of the superior unit ) to carry out attacks from behind, after the infantry disembarked, the helicopters could perform other combat missions (combat support missions and logistical support missions, among others), all this coordination to provide support and conditions for the armored vehicles to be able to advance (a maneuver that the Russians are trying and losing dozens of armored vehicles).

I watched the video and it doesn't seem like a disaster outside of Oct 10-11 when they tried to 'coup de main' & close part of the salient with a massed armored thrust. Their counter-battery offensive did not suppress the enemy batteries enough.

The Russians have limited troop quality (penal assault companies, mobilized infantry units, etc.) and aren't using mounted airmobile forces, likely due to Ukrainian AA.

Overall it seems that nobody has figured out how to executive efficient, rapid and powerful combined arms operations with modern ISR, AA & PGMs yet, the troop quality and planning capability doesn't seem to be there.
 

Sinnavuuty

Senior Member
Registered Member
The Russians have limited troop quality (penal assault companies, mobilized infantry units, etc.) and aren't using mounted airmobile forces, likely due to Ukrainian AA.
This is all mitigated with electronic warfare support, air support, infiltration at night or in adverse weather, suppression of the enemy's anti-aircraft defense system with artillery, among other elements that must be included in mission planning.
Overall it seems that nobody has figured out how to executive efficient, rapid and powerful combined arms operations with modern ISR, AA & PGMs yet, the troop quality and planning capability doesn't seem to be there.
I agree. However, the problem seems to be more execution than planning itself. We have two armies that are incapable of exercising combined arms maneuvers on the offensive (especially against fortified targets), but are excellent on the defensive.
 

typexx

Junior Member
Registered Member

Ukrainian army inducts Ratel-S kamikaze small UGV to blow up tanks​

Army Recognition Global Defense and Security news


Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
 

Sinnavuuty

Senior Member
Registered Member
Russians continue to innovate.

The Ukrainians tried to apply western combat doctrine in their grand offensive and got clapped way harder than the Russians. There are many firsthand accounts where the vaunted western military experts literally sidestepped obvious and important questions from Ukrainian veterans by applying magical thinking or outright avoiding the question. Such as suggesting you simply ‘go around’ the minefields or not being able to offer an advice on drone use since they themselves don’t use small combat drones or have any playbook for what to do if facing them.
@plawolf
A western army planning in which the man in command decides to attack the strongest point of the fortified line either he is crazy or completely stupid.
 

plawolf

Lieutenant General
This is all mitigated with electronic warfare support, air support, infiltration at night or in adverse weather, suppression of the enemy's anti-aircraft defense system with artillery, among other elements that must be included in mission planning.

I agree. However, the problem seems to be more execution than planning itself. We have two armies that are incapable of exercising combined arms maneuvers on the offensive (especially against fortified targets), but are excellent on the defensive.

Someone clearly hasn’t bothered to keep track of major developments throughout this war.

The Russians tried all of that and it only led to heavier losses earlier in the war.

This ugly slugfest is what happens when two near-peers go to war where neither side holds overwhelming across the board dominance.

The kind of western textbook combined arms offensive you describe is only possible with overwhelming military dominance across the board.

The Ukrainians tried to apply western combat doctrine in their grand offensive and got clapped way harder than the Russians. There are many firsthand accounts where the vaunted western military experts literally sidestepped obvious and important questions from Ukrainian veterans by applying magical thinking or outright avoiding the question. Such as suggesting you simply ‘go around’ the minefields or not being able to offer an advice on drone use since they themselves don’t use small combat drones or have any playbook for what to do if facing them.
 

TK3600

Major
Registered Member
Someone clearly hasn’t bothered to keep track of major developments throughout this war.

The Russians tried all of that and it only led to heavier losses earlier in the war.

This ugly slugfest is what happens when two near-peers go to war where neither side holds overwhelming across the board dominance.

The kind of western textbook combined arms offensive you describe is only possible with overwhelming military dominance across the board.

The Ukrainians tried to apply western combat doctrine in their grand offensive and got clapped way harder than the Russians. There are many firsthand accounts where the vaunted western military experts literally sidestepped obvious and important questions from Ukrainian veterans by applying magical thinking or outright avoiding the question. Such as suggesting you simply ‘go around’ the minefields or not being able to offer an advice on drone use since they themselves don’t use small combat drones or have any playbook for what to do if facing them.
Ukrainians fought very well all things considered. It is only when western 'experts' arrived they began to be sloppy. Frankly I am shocked that anyone trust the 'western expert'. When is the last time western trained army won? Those lose consistently like Vietnam, Afganistan, and etc.
 

FairAndUnbiased

Brigadier
Registered Member
Someone clearly hasn’t bothered to keep track of major developments throughout this war.

The Russians tried all of that and it only led to heavier losses earlier in the war.

This ugly slugfest is what happens when two near-peers go to war where neither side holds overwhelming across the board dominance.

The kind of western textbook combined arms offensive you describe is only possible with overwhelming military dominance across the board.

The Ukrainians tried to apply western combat doctrine in their grand offensive and got clapped way harder than the Russians. There are many firsthand accounts where the vaunted western military experts literally sidestepped obvious and important questions from Ukrainian veterans by applying magical thinking or outright avoiding the question. Such as suggesting you simply ‘go around’ the minefields or not being able to offer an advice on drone use since they themselves don’t use small combat drones or have any playbook for what to do if facing them.
Their hubris is what is going to lead to a major humiliation if they keep poking a major rival of their own creation. They are literally being shown exactly what the threats are, and they're refusing to adapt. Imagine when faced with a threat they don't know. It's going to be ugly for them.
 

Cult Icon

Junior Member
Registered Member
I agree. However, the problem seems to be more execution than planning itself. We have two armies that are incapable of exercising combined arms maneuvers on the offensive (especially against fortified targets), but are excellent on the defensive.

This battle is looking similar to Bakhmut-Soledar, where the Russians slowly creep forward at a glacial pace. Over the past 3 weeks the ring around Avdiivka has tightened.
 
Top