The War in the Ukraine

GodRektsNoobs

Junior Member
Registered Member
The pilot of the MiG-29 fighter of the Armed Forces of Ukraine Vladislav svilev received training courses for fighter pilots at the US military base in Mississippi for two years. In March 2023, he completed his training, returned to Ukraine and died on one of his first combat sorties after his return.
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

Denmark and Norway jointly offer additional artillery shells for Ukraine army​

Denmark and Norway have once again joined forces to donate artillery shells to Ukraine. This time it concerns a total of 9,000 shell components. In addition, Denmark itself donated a further 1,500 complete artillery shells and 500 grenades.
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

Tank battle from drone
At this rate, it should be the Ukrainians training NATO, not the other way around. Ukrainians are far more effective using tactics which they learned by blood since 2014. I imagine that the only assistance they could actually use from NATO are tips on how to handle Western weapons.
 

H2O

Junior Member
Registered Member
Off topic but I have a feeling the US kept the Titanic submersible story cooking for so long (instead of instantly telling people it was an implosion) in order to distract from the failure of the counteroffensive (or at least the first stage)

IIRC, it's less about the failed counteroffensive but more on domestic issues like Hunter Biden's pleading guilty to tax evasion. Typical US media behavior is to distract from domestic issues and the go-to is some foreign problem. The exception is Israel which the IDF recently got ambushed in some refugee camp.
 

HighGround

Senior Member
Registered Member
At this rate, it should be the Ukrainians training NATO, not the other way around. Ukrainians are far more effective using tactics which they learned by blood since 2014. I imagine that the only assistance they could actually use from NATO are tips on how to handle Western weapons.

There is a very high likelihood that NATO and US are very heavily involved in the planning of Ukraine's offensive operations. They certainly provide the intelligence, the reconnaissance, and the raw war material obviously. This is from an
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
about the Kharkiv-Balaklia counter-offensive.

Instead of one large offensive, the Ukrainian military proposed two. One, in Kherson, would most likely take days or weeks before any dramatic results because of the concentration of Russian troops. The other was planned for near Kharkiv.
Together Britain, the United States and Ukraine conducted an assessment of the new plan, trying to war game it once more. This time officials from the three countries agreed it would work — and give Mr. Zelensky what he wanted: a big, clear victory.
But the plan, according to an officer on the general staff in Kyiv, depended entirely on the size and pace of additional military aid from the United States.
Ukraine, a former Soviet republic that had used older Soviet weapons, exhausted most of its own ammunition. Learning how to use new weapons systems in the middle of the war is difficult. But so far the risky move has proved successful. More than 800,000 rounds of 155-millimeter artillery shells, for instance, have been sent to Kyiv, helping fuel its current offensives. The United States alone has committed more than
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
since the war started in February.

Before the counteroffensive, Ukraine’s armed forces sent the United States a detailed list of weapons they needed to make the plan successful, according to the Ukrainian officer.

So it is highly likely that the current counter-offensive has the stamp of approval from NATO general staff. There are a lot of caveats to be had with what "approval" means of course, but nevertheless, this is part of NATO's handiwork.

Though I would still caution people from making strong conclusions. One month is nothing. I've heard it all before. How the assassination of Russian generals would destroy Russia's C2 network. How HIMARS and now Storm Shadows will destroy Russia's logistics... Now into the 2nd year of this war, it's pretty clear that Russia is neither very stupid nor particularly incompetent. Like any military they have their weaknesses and strengths, and it is an organization that can and does adapt.

Expect Ukraine to do the same. Despite Russian reporting that Ukraine just seems to send waves of men into Russian defenses pointlessly, it is quite obvious to me that there has been variation and changes in how Ukraine has approached Russian lines. We also seldom get reports from Russia's backline units.

Has Ukraine tried different drone tactics? How would we know without talking to one of Russia's EW companies?

Has Ukraine moved their Air Defense assets in response to VKS activity? How would we know without satellite footage?

It could very well be that Ukraine is making much bigger adjustments during this "operational pause" and that their next wave of attacks is going to be much more effective, and much better prepared now. Keep your fingers crossed.
 

Anlsvrthng

Captain
Registered Member
Well, I'm a bit surprised? Not that I like nor that I would rate him trustworthy, but I find it amazing that a Russian with such an exposed role in this operation is "allowed" to speak that way.

As such I cannot believe you really think this is faked by the CIA - as you suppose to claim - ... the question however why does he rant that way all the time and even more what's his role in this ugly war besides being the boss of Wagner? And IMO surely not a propagandist "by the CIA/Ukrainan KGB."




Agreed ... but the question again is, why is he allowed to speak that way?
How much chance you give to see the Raythenon/Blacwater CEO making political statement and sharing classified information just for fun ?

And afterwards, how much time it takes to find themselves behind bars? one hour , or one day?

That guy part of the Russian elite. Up to this point he made technical critism, about in interest of his business/staff.
The previous political critism that he said was a lie, do your remember the Bakhmut failure of Russian units, that was nothing else just an unrelated transaltion of his original transcript?


Russia follow a simple strategy, exhaust the NATO until they run out of war materials.

The Washington elite , represented by the capitol run a simple scheme as well, fermenting political unrest in Russia, and take over the power with indirect methods, as happened in Syria, Ukraine, Yugoslavia and so on.

This transcript match the strategy and interest of the Capitol, not any Russian elite that seeking power.

Again, turn around, and think a bit about the chances to see similar statement from anyone in the USA policital / economical elite. Only person that tried neutral ground was musk. But he in practice gives the communication network for the Pentagon : D
 

Sheleah

Junior Member
Registered Member
Ukrainian forces carry out assault on territory near Krasnohorivka for the first time since 2014, this territory is controlled by pro-Russian fighters and together with the Russians they felt untouchable in that area


the consolidation of occupied territories by Russia does not seem very stable. It would be a big blow if Ukraine approaches Donetsk again with the intention of liberating it.
 

HighGround

Senior Member
Registered Member

muddie

Junior Member
The main problem with Ukraine's counteroffensive is that it is largely politically motivated rather than strategic. It may be planned by NATO and signed off by the U.S., but it doesn't change the fact that it was flawed from the start.

NATO generals can plan best to their ability based on what the AFU received and the intelligence they have, they have no influence on how much political support AFU will continue to get. Ukraine needs to demonstrate it can achieve results because if they can't, support will wan very quickly as this is very expensive war to sponsor for the West.
 

HighGround

Senior Member
Registered Member
The main problem with Ukraine's counteroffensive is that it is largely politically motivated rather than strategic. It may be planned by NATO and signed off by the U.S., but it doesn't change the fact that it was flawed from the start.

You have no way of knowing that. And no, there are substantial strategic reasons to carry out a counter-offensive in the Zaporozhia direction.
 
Top