Seems the Ukranians used a Storm Shadow to hit the Crimean bridge...but the one that links it to Kherson, not mainland Russia
Seems the Ukranians used a Storm Shadow to hit the Crimean bridge...but the one that links it to Kherson, not mainland Russia
Not well. It's not over yet by any means but it's undeniable at this point that they have had quite a rough start.Been a couple of days since I've followed this thread
Are there any big picture updates? How's the counteroffensive going?
It's from Brother Zoka.. so his comment section will always be "spicy".
The fate of interception tho is uncertain but one thing for sure it's not tree line at the end. could be cloud or explosion. and it's not the missile hitting target either as it's from 5 km distance.
i think its worse than that, the fact that russia has started its own offensive on the kupyansk-lyman front shows that it is quite confident that the current deployed forces in zaporozhia is more than enough to take on anything ukraine can throw at them. ukraine is now running into issues with being unable to concentrate its forces, having diverted some of its reserves north to blunt the russian offensive around kupyansk. if ukraine does not take on a defensive posture soon and continues to spend its forces on fruitless attacks, then i am worried this winter will see another russian offensive with devastating results.Not well. It's not over yet by any means but it's undeniable at this point that they have had quite a rough start.
You can also observe how pro west commentators have reverted to harping about their technological superiority, which is their signature last line of mental defense and usually a signal things aren't going to plan for them.
(Technically there already is such a system, It has been in service for around ~2 years i think but it will never enter Ukro service though.)
I find the analysis by the Apache pilot interesting, there is an analysis by Leopard gunner before this as well.
From what I can tell, there is really no effective way of defending against such attacks, the missiles are launched at a range of 10-12km away, at this range, the helicopter is outside the detection range both the naked eye and thermal cameras. On top of that, it is outside of the range of all known NATO SHORAD systems.
Perhaps we might even see the development of a new Generation of NATO SHORAD systems in response to this, but I doubt they care that much about the experience of their client state.
missiles have physical limitation of minimum intercept altitude.(Technically there already is such a system, It has been in service for around ~2 years i think but it will never enter Ukro service though.)
View attachment 114849
The maximum speed of Aster 30 missiles is 1.4km/sec. Aster 30 has the capability to intercept targets at altitudes from 50 m to 20 km. against aircraft targets flying at altitudes above 3 km, the maximum range of the Aster 30 is 100 km. At aircraft targets with altitudes below 3 km, the range of Aster 30 is 50 km.
Another planned addition to the Ka-52’s arsenal is the Hermes-A, which has a maximum range of 54nm (100km). The new air-launched weapons feature multi-spectral target seekers using laser, elctro-optical, photo-contrast and thermal imaging technologies.
Isn't the S1 networked?
Huh, is it using one radar to do the search and targeting?(Technically there already is such a system, It has been in service for around ~2 years i think but it will never enter Ukro service though.)
View attachment 114849
Yeah but you are facing low RCS target and flies low enough that ground based radars have problem. and Pantsyr can only do so much.
It still need its own target tracking radar to lock the target and guide the missile on it. it's a command guided missile and it cannot really receive 3rd party guidance or illumination.