Apparently Oryx will no longer continue counting. The task seems unfortunately eating deeply into his well being without proper appreciation. I wish him well in his future endeavour.
Problem is those planes needs airstrips and supply infrastructure.
And main usage would be restricted as flyable air defence .
Problem is in both role the Mig29 and Su27 superior compared to the western planes.
Capable to work in very bad conditions, easy to maintain, and insensitive.
Anyaway, after few decade its war finaly show that the Soviet weapons superior to the western ones.
Western advertising and design consider only one-two sapect of the weapons , Soviets considered all aspect as a weapon.
Example the F-35 stealth capability in Ukrainan field conditions would be degraded to an f-18 level in few weeks time.
And the engine life would decrease to few hundreds of hour .
Most likelly any wetern plane introduced to Ukraine would use up all spare parts and engines for that type in half year time.
Not a suprise no one talk about transfering western airplanes to Ukraine, instead try to scrap the bottom of barrel for usable Soviet planes and parts.
Lmao, what a clown. From all the time he could quit, he really choose this time. What a coincidenceApparently Oryx will no longer continue counting. The task seems unfortunately eating deeply into his well being without proper appreciation. I wish him well in his future endeavour.
The Ukrainians certainly seem to have enough ammo to waste thousands of artillery shells a day bombing civilian areas in Belgorod and Donetsk. One of the reasons Ukraine is performing so bad is precisely because they are not fighting with the same strategy as a conventional army. Instead of striking enemy troop concentrations they waste a lot of ammunition hitting civilian targets. Allegedly Ukraine is using like 3-4k 152/155mm shells a day on such targets.The Ukrainian ammunition shortage has seriously effected their ability to provide important fire support to their attacking groups of infantry and AFVs, leading to poor results.
It is not like Ukraine does not have mines which can be remotely deployed with artillery or MLRS. It is just that those systems are way less automated.The Russians also have a self-propelled minelayer unit that can shoot and automatically generate minefields from long range.
They clearly haven't. What Ukraine did the last couple of days was push more infantry to the front in huge numbers. This means their pace of advance slightly increased, but casualties have more than doubled if you believe the numbers the Russians are putting out.I have no idea how Ukraine-nato have planned on confronting this problem outside of brute force and attacking with superior numbers.
Any non-AESA equipped F-16 and F-18 has a worse radar than the Su-35 and MiG-31BM the Russians have. And do you really think NATO will provide enough aircraft so Ukraine can equalize things? The Russians have hundreds of such aircraft. Even if they wanted to provide similar numbers of aircraft to Ukraine, the Russians would just strike aircraft concentration zones with cruise missiles.We might see an aspect of it in the supply of F16 and F18 aircraft
Not really. They do not have AESA radar so they have like half the radar range of the Su-35 and MiG-31BM. And the AMRAAM has less range than the R-37M. The Russian aircraft were upgraded in like the 2010s. There is like a 20 year gap in technology even with those modernized aircraft they announced they will supply to Ukraine. Let alone the late Cold War fodder that Ukraine was previously using.Also, as all those aircraft were updated at least in 1990s with AMRAAM capability - they're going to close the qualitative gap with RuAF, significantly.
No. Just no.Ukrainian helicopters, su-25s and mig-29s are quite active - up to VKS standards of activity.
Ukraine got a lot of spare aircraft and parts from former Warsaw Pact members after the conflict started. The Su-27 was not exported to the Warsaw Pact.But Ukrainian Su-27s are notably less active, and Su-24 fleet is now for special purposes only - not just because of storm shadows, but simply because getting them into air isn't exactly simple.
Come on, that seems like a massive and obvious exaggeration since Ukraine barely managed 6k shells per day at their peak, which was achieved in August 2022.The Ukrainians certainly seem to have enough ammo to waste thousands of artillery shells a day bombing civilian areas in Belgorod and Donetsk. One of the reasons Ukraine is performing so bad is precisely because they are not fighting with the same strategy as a conventional army. Instead of striking enemy troop concentrations they waste a lot of ammunition hitting civilian targets. Allegedly Ukraine is using like 3-4k 152/155mm shells a day on such targets.
It was the smart thing to do.Lmao, what a clown. From all the time he could quit, he really choose this time. What a coincidence
If that doesn't scream he is a propaganda asset, I don't know what it will take to convince people that he is a hack
Ranges are secondary thing, ranges matter for those who actually can fight.Not really. They do not have AESA radar so they have like half the radar range of the Su-35 and MiG-31BM. And the AMRAAM has less range than the R-37M. The Russian aircraft were upgraded in like the 2010s. There is like a 20 year gap in technology even with those modernized aircraft they announced they will supply to Ukraine. Let alone the late Cold War fodder that Ukraine was previously using.
Well, Ukraine's most-flying Su-25 pilot is almost at 350 combat sorties.No. Just no.
When we talk about aircraft, all of this is secondary. Largest source of aircraft for Ukraine during the first year was Ukraine itself.Ukraine got a lot of spare aircraft and parts from former Warsaw Pact members after the conflict started. The Su-27 was not exported to the Warsaw Pact.