The War in the Ukraine

CrazyHorse

Junior Member
Registered Member
Weibo is also amazed by the weakness of German tank armor.
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

By comparing it with the boots, it can be seen that the thickness of the armor plate may be less than 40mm.

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

Xi Yazhou's comment on the current situation of the War in Ukraine.
The Precision-guided munition obtained by Ukrainians from NATO largely offset the advantages of the Russian army. And the intelligence support provided by NATO has played a significant role.

However, due to material constraints, the reconnaissance capabilities of the Ukrainian army are very low, relying solely on NATO to provide coordinates for the target area. This has led to serious waste of valuable ammunition in Ukraine.
But the Russian army is very "cooperative". At present, their communication confidentiality ability is very poor. This makes it easy for Ukrainians to attack the front command post of the Russian army.

Summary: The level of informatization on both sides of the conflict is very low.
Well in that case, what is the thickness of the top of the type-99? Most tanks have thing roofs so it’s really no surprise.
 

Tam

Brigadier
Registered Member
Ukraine managed to score destroying one Russian Zoopark unit and one EW station. This is in the Bakhmut sector.


Australian MRAP Bushmaster destroyed.


10,000 Russian soldiers gets bonuses for destroying equipment as per new Putin announcement.


Remains of a Ukrainian T-64BV and a Maxxpro.


Remains of a Ukrainian convoy.

 

Anlsvrthng

Captain
Registered Member
Interesting, there is no jail term if a person public videos of strikes in Russia.
Means we have way more data about Russian losses than Ukrainan one.

MEans most likelly the NATO loss magnitude more war material on the Ukrainan areas than Russia .

Considering that for every Russian ammo dump strike we have ten Ukrainan territory one, and the there is not so much Ukranans brave enought to make pictures of the strike, there must be magnitudes more ammo dump loss on NATO side than on the Russian side.

So, if we consider that the NATO hasn't got capacity to make war materials the balance must be pity .

Magnitude less material, magnitude more loss.

Doesn't looks well.
 

tankphobia

Senior Member
Registered Member
Interesting, there is no jail term if a person public videos of strikes in Russia.
Means we have way more data about Russian losses than Ukrainan one.

MEans most likelly the NATO loss magnitude more war material on the Ukrainan areas than Russia .

Considering that for every Russian ammo dump strike we have ten Ukrainan territory one, and the there is not so much Ukranans brave enought to make pictures of the strike, there must be magnitudes more ammo dump loss on NATO side than on the Russian side.

So, if we consider that the NATO hasn't got capacity to make war materials the balance must be pity .

Magnitude less material, magnitude more loss.

Doesn't looks well.
That's kinda a weird conclusion to make based on a few videos on twitter. China maintain good OPSEC about its military and ban/arrest OSINTERs, yet I wouldn't use that as a sign of anything.
 

Gloire_bb

Captain
Registered Member
I can only imagine what will happen with a 4 month training if a 2 year one wasn't enough.
historically, first few contested combat sorties are the most dangerous.

Here it was aggravated - offensive=troops under attack, need to show for years in the West, and he was a well-viewed, good pilot in the first place.

Ultimately, overly high pressure on a pilot, who in terms of combat was still arguably a novice. A few sorties later he could've became great. Could have.
 

Anlsvrthng

Captain
Registered Member
That's kinda a weird conclusion to make based on a few videos on twitter. China maintain good OPSEC about its military and ban/arrest OSINTERs, yet I wouldn't use that as a sign of anything.
We have three, non corelated data .

1. Russia has more ammunition than the NATO
2. There is less data about the strikes on ukraine/NATO territories ,because an Ukrainan couild go to jail for long time if publicise anything.. No similar issue in Russia.
3. More pictures seen by my about explosion of NATO war materials than Russian .

1. Russian_ammunition>NATO_ammunition
2.Number of reports about each stike on ammo dumps Russia_report>>Ukrainan_reports
3.observed flow of pictures from both side NATO_dump_loss>Russian_dump_loss
So, daily ammo loss due to ammo dump strikes:
Russian_ammunition*(Russian_dumpl_loss/Russian_reports)<< NATO_ammunition*(NATO_dumpl_loss/Ukrainan_reports)
dumpl_loss and reports normalised value, not counts.
 

Tam

Brigadier
Registered Member
Speaking of ammunition depots, this one owned by the Ukrainian 47th Brigade got popped by the Russians. This is one of those new brigades that are completely equipped with Western equipment, including M4 rifles and young commanders that were trained from scratch by NATO with no training from Ukrainian and Soviet schools whatsoever.


Ukrainian supply truck disabled by Russian artillery.

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

Ka-52 destroying two Ukrainian vehicles.

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

Soldiers of the Edelweiss brigade surrendering at the Bakhmut sector.

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

Captured soldiers from the Ukrainian 35th Marine Brigade.

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

Captured soldiers from the Ukrainian 31st Brigade. There seems to be many captured and surrender pics and videos lately.

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

Destruction of an M777 in Kherson.

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

Burned out MaxxPros in Zaporozhye.

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
 
Last edited:

Biscuits

Colonel
Registered Member
Interesting, there is no jail term if a person public videos of strikes in Russia.
Means we have way more data about Russian losses than Ukrainan one.

MEans most likelly the NATO loss magnitude more war material on the Ukrainan areas than Russia .

Considering that for every Russian ammo dump strike we have ten Ukrainan territory one, and the there is not so much Ukranans brave enought to make pictures of the strike, there must be magnitudes more ammo dump loss on NATO side than on the Russian side.

So, if we consider that the NATO hasn't got capacity to make war materials the balance must be pity .

Magnitude less material, magnitude more loss.

Doesn't looks well.
Abscence of evidence cannot be taken as evidence.

Right now, the most reliable and maybe only way to gauge the conflict would be by looking at how the front moves.
 
Top