I think everyone opining about the exact number of missiles shot down and the capability of this or that platform are falling into a narrative trap set by Ukraine, and this includes those who are politically pro-Russia. Namely, Russia's operational goal at this point is not the degradation of Ukrainian infrastructure, or demoralizing the Ukrainian people, or even the destruction of C4 centers, which it has never even attempted. It is exclusively to force them to run down their stocks of increasingly scarce and difficult to replace SAMs such that their air defense network becomes degraded to the point where Russian air power can be employed more freely. And don't take it exclusively from me, Micheal Kofman, who is very much pro-Ukraine politically, has been saying the same thing since the bombardments started all the way back in October. The implication of this is that it really doesn't matter, like at all, whether Russian missiles actually make it to their purported 'targets', the only thing that matters is that Ukraine try as hard as it can to shoot them down. This is also probably why they have switched from a strategy of many cruise missiles to a smaller number of ballistic ones: more missiles need to be launched for a guaranteed kill on a ballistic, so it's a more cost effective way to run down Ukraine's ammo stocks.
And for the record, the leaks made very clear that Ukraine is essentially out of ammunition for Soviet-era air defense platforms. That's why the patriots were transferred with such urgency and have been given such a prominent position in their wartime propaganda.