A very good article analysing the new 155mm BONUS submunition recently delivered from France to the Ukrainian Army .
If Russia does that then they are fools. Ukraine would keep most of its industrial capabilities if we use current positions as the delineating border. When Russia next had trouble with Ukraine, they would be significantly stronger than they are right now and much more of a hassle. I think capturing Kharkiv and Zaporizhzhia is a minimum, but ideally central Ukraine should be captured or subdued including Kiev and Dnipro. This "Korean scenario" does not meet Russian goals. Either they are Finlandized or it won't stop.Danilov says Ukraine being offered 'Korean scenario' for truce. "We are currently being offered the Korean scenario, which would mean the division of the country.. The so-called conditional '38th parallel.' Here are Ukrainians, but there Ukrainians are not like that. The Russians will now invent anything. I know for sure that one of the options they can offer us is the '38th parallel'," Danilov said.
By giving up Kherson on the other side of the Dnieper river Russia made that impossible. Going along the coast I mean. They would have to come through Belarus.One of Russia's main targets is Novorossiya, map below
I might be mistaken but I think they invented optimization theory after the war. As for stamped guns, the Germans had better technology in that actually, they made the MG-42 out of stamped parts. Russia had to adapt German stamping technology later after the war to be able to make the stamped AK-47. But yes the PPSh was way easier to manufacture than German submachine guns back then.Soviets also mastered the Ford management method of assembly line industrial mass production. They also invented optimization theory. This led them to several industrial innovations like very fast and cheap produced stamped parts for guns rather than much more expensive and slower to produce forged or milled components.
I think Russia needs to stick to realities on the ground. I recall how at the earlier stages of war, people were discussing how all of Ukraine would be overrun. Russia just doesn't have the numbers on the ground. Also, people keep saying 'Russia is being soft'. No, I think they have genuine logistic limitations and are doing best that they can. Russia has already politically stated that their aim is to integrate Russian speaking parts into Russia proper and close this topic.If Russia does that then they are fools.
I cannot see them go west of the Dnieper after leaving Kherson. The best they can do is taking all the east while blowing all the bridges... The least they can do is stopping with Luhansk, Donets, Zaporizhia and east part of Kherson, and having a land border that will be an unending mess.I think Russia needs to stick to realities on the ground. I recall how at the earlier stages of war, people were discussing how all of Ukraine would be overrun. Russia just doesn't have the numbers on the ground. Also, people keep saying 'Russia is being soft'. No, I think they have genuine logistic limitations and are doing best that they can. Russia has already politically stated that their aim is to integrate Russian speaking parts into Russia proper and close this topic.
I think whatever they are holding now +/- little here and there, is the best case scenario right now unless Ukraine suddenly collapses which I don't think they would. This also only if there is external pressure on Ukraine to do it.I cannot see them go west of the Dnieper after leaving Kherson. The best they can do is taking all the east while blowing all the bridges... The least they can do is stopping with Luhansk, Donets, Zaporizhia and east part of Kherson, and having a land border that will be an unending mess.
Less than that is failure.
If Russia does that then they are fools. Ukraine would keep most of its industrial capabilities if we use current positions as the delineating border. When Russia next had trouble with Ukraine, they would be significantly stronger than they are right now and much more of a hassle. I think capturing Kharkiv and Zaporizhzhia is a minimum, but ideally central Ukraine should be captured or subdued including Kiev and Dnipro. This "Korean scenario" does not meet Russian goals. Either they are Finlandized or it won't stop.
I think any leaving any pro-Western regime intact is a failure....what's the point of adding more land or territory to the world's #1 largest country unless it's to serve a grand strategy... it would only delay future conflicts in the future with an re-armed enemy that would even more costly down the line... Might as well use everything in Russia's arsenal to eliminate regime and install a puppet or annex the entire country ...