Meanwhile the usual war of figures has begun...
They may not have shot down 54 cruisers, but it seems to me that the Russians are putting together fewer and fewer missiles for their bi-weekly 'saturation' attacks. I think it's beginning to become apparent that they now fire the ones they can produce. And anyway, they also shoot them down with manpads, which is probably the most cost effective method if you can get a number of back-up systems around sensitive targets.
Very interesting video, and looks real.
Timinig is OK, the operator was under the missile as it flyby, launched the SAM at sec, explosion around 8-9 sec, it is the real times for an on tai lengagement.
If the interceptor twice as fast as the target then as many second passed since the closes aproach until the launch will be required to hit the target.
Problem is , most likelly every succesfull interception require at least 3, possibly 5 launch.
And to have enought MANPADS to make a screen, it require at least 1000 launcher to make a credible filter on one side, I think it is safe to assume Ukraine would need 4000 MANPADS at minimum, and a weekly 200 replenishment.
Required trained operators, without proper training the stock will be depleted in weeks time.
Means again, the full Stinger stock of the USArequired to cover Ukraine needs.
Correcton, the soldier use a grom, by reports the stinger cant intercept cruise missile.
So , ukraine needs fewthousand grom, as it stand.