The Sino-Russian Strategic Partnership starts to get serious!

broadsword

Brigadier
Beijing’s Bear Hug on Russian Oil

Beijing’s Bear Hug on Russian Oil
Michal Meidan, Director, China Matters
September 22, 2014


China stands to gain much more than oil from deepening Western sanctions on Russia. Already in May, Moscow’s tenuous international position prompted it to make concessions in order to sign a landmark gas supply agreement – the “Power of Siberia” pipeline – that had been under negotiation for more than a decade. With additional sanctions announced on Russian energy firms, Beijing is emerging as the biggest benefactor. Not only does it stand to become a key export destination of Russian oil and gas, Chinese companies are also well positioned to gain access to the Russian upstream, which has thus far been off limits to them. Under Xi Jinping’s China, the rocky Sino-Soviet relationship is at its best, without Beijing having had to make a single concession.

Deals, deals and more deals

In early September, Vice Premier Zhang Gaoli co-chaired the 11th meeting of the China-Russia Energy Cooperation Committee in Moscow. He couldn’t have asked for a warmer welcome: Chinese firms were offered a stake in Rosneft’s Vankor field, one of its largest Siberian energy projects and a crucial source of crude oil for the ESPO pipeline that transports oil to China. Zhang also attended a ceremony to mark the start of construction work of the landmark “Power of Siberia” gas pipeline, which will transport 38 billion cubic meters (bcm) to China starting in 2019. He also discussed with his Russian counterpart the prospects for an additional 30 bcm gas pipeline to China.

While Sino-Russian negotiations have been notoriously lengthy, Moscow’s weak international standing could nudge things along at a faster pace. Negotiations on an upstream stake and the second (Western) gas pipeline will likely accelerate in the coming months as Moscow in particular will be keen to generate positive headlines during an October meeting between Premier Li Keqiang and his Russian counterpart Dmitry Medvedev and, more importantly, during a Xi Jinping-Vladimir Putin meeting on the side-lines of the APEC summit in China in November.

A win for China

The deals are vital for Russia as China’s geopolitical support and financing help cushion the impact of deepening Western sanctions. But they are also significant for China: a stake in Vankor would be a win for Beijing that has long sought access to Russia’s upstream. Moreover, the huge onshore field is not challenging to develop, and is already generating significant returns. Vankor and its satellite fields could produce 1 million barrels a day by 2020. If granted the stake, Chinese firms would buy into a highly lucrative deal, bailout cash-strapped Rosneft, and have a stake in the entire supply chain, from the upstream, through the pipeline to the refining.

Additional oil imports would be an added bonus. Crude oil flows from Russia have increased from an average 490,000 bpd over the last two years to more than 600,000 bpd this year, as Rosneft and Transneft repay their 2009 oil-backed loans. An additional 300,000 bpd are tied to these loans. A stake in the Vankor field would probably entail an additional loan to Rosneft, tied once again to more crude oil going to China. For China’s decision makers, investing in the Russian oil sector and creating further potential overland supplies are appealing since this will help cap imports from the Persian Gulf.

Stepping on the gas?

Reports from Zhang’s visit suggest that construction of the “power of Siberia” pipeline is now under way, and that negotiations on the Western route are gaining momentum. If both routes materialize, Russian pipeline gas to China will reach 68 bcm, accounting for 15% of the country’s gas supplies post 2020. To be sure, there are many uncertainties surrounding this prospect: First, construction of the pipeline and upstream development will need to advance quickly in order for gas deliveries to begin in 2019. Yet Gazprom may find it challenging to meet such a tight deadline in its current financial and political situation: Sanctions over Russia’s role in the Ukraine crisis could limit its financing options, and internally, Moscow is also attempting to challenge Gazprom’s export monopoly.

It’s the price, stupid!

In light of Gazprom’s woes, Chinese firms have a greater chance of acquiring stakes in gas fields as well. The precedent set by Rosneft--which secured an energy backed loan from China in 2009, and is now willing to grant China an upstream stake--will place further pressure on Gazprom to cooperate with Chinese financiers and energy companies. But the timeframe for this, and for supplies reaching China is an open question.

Russia will increasingly want to conclude a second gas pipeline deal in the current geopolitical context, but in order for the pipeline to be viable, prices would have to be extremely competitive with contracted volumes from Central Asia, as well as with falling LNG prices. It was no coincidence that Zhang paid a state visit to Turkmenistan where he pledged to further boost energy ties. Turkmenistan has become a model investment for China, one that it would happily replicate in Russia: CNPC has a stake in the giant Galkynysh natural gas field, which will supply some of the planned 65 bcm of Turkmen gas exports to China by 2020. Chinese negotiators will therefore drive a very hard bargain on prices for any new gas supply contracts, considering also that on top of Central Asian and Myanmar pipeline exports, Chinese importers are ramping up their LNG capacity and contracts, while also investing in domestic resources. The challenge for Gazprom to deliver under such circumstances would be even greater, especially if Rosneft were to vie for a share of the gas pie.

Irrespective of how much gas Russia supplies China, Beijing’s bear hug will become an inescapable reality. China’s willingness to support Russia both economically and geopolitically is high, given what is suggested to be a close personal connection between Xi and Putin, but mainly, because it comes at very little cost for China.

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
 

POKL

New Member
Even tigers are into the strategic partnership.

Siberian tiger set free by Putin crosses Chinese border -source CCTV

A tiger, set free by Russian President Vladimir Putin, has somehow drifted into China.

Chinese officials say they were informed by Russia on Friday that the big cat, tagged with a tracking device, was in China, and had left Heilongjiang’s Luobei region where it had been initially observed.

It moved to the north-western part of the Lesser Hinggan Mountain, as hair, feces and tracks, possibly left by the tiger, were discovered in the area.

Mr. Putin released the tiger "Kuzya", along with two other Siberian tigers into the wild in May. Fewer than 500 Siberian tigers remain in the wild, mainly in eastern Russia, north-east China and northern parts of the Korean Peninsula.

Link:

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
 

AssassinsMace

Lieutenant General
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!


Has anyone heard of this from another source? Would Saudis go along with losing untold billions? Also the only reason why the gas and oil shale business is economically feasible is because of high oil prices. That threatens US energy independence from the gas and oil shale boom.
 

Equation

Lieutenant General
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!


Has anyone heard of this from another source? Would Saudis go along with losing untold billions? Also the only reason why the gas and oil shale business is economically feasible is because of high oil prices. That threatens US energy independence from the gas and oil shale boom.

True, but it would help the airline, freight train, and shipping companies to save on fuel cost, therefore effect many other industries as well.
 

Engineer

Major
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!


Has anyone heard of this from another source? Would Saudis go along with losing untold billions? Also the only reason why the gas and oil shale business is economically feasible is because of high oil prices. That threatens US energy independence from the gas and oil shale boom.

Oil price goes down by 20% ever since Ukraine civil war started.
 

broadsword

Brigadier
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!


Has anyone heard of this from another source? Would Saudis go along with losing untold billions? Also the only reason why the gas and oil shale business is economically feasible is because of high oil prices. That threatens US energy independence from the gas and oil shale boom.

China has been making swap deals with its trading partners, including Australia, so it should come as no surprise that Russia has its turn. That the Saudis would go along with losing money tells you why America is such a strong supporter of the totalitarian government. Who needs enemies when you can have such compliant friends?

Shale oil Enefit’s chief executive, Sandor Liive, says his plants should be profitable so long as oil prices stay above $75 a barrel. Brent crude is now about $88, so the price is still acceptable. I don't think the US will not want to kill its own shale industry.
 

Equation

Lieutenant General
Is this even possible? Not just technically but economic wise. There is just far too many open country spaces between Moscow and Beijing to make it viable. My guess is as the west continues to push Putin and Russia about the crisis in Ukraine the stronger the political relationship between Moscow and Beijing.


Beijing (AFP) - China and Russia are considering building a high-speed rail line thousands of kilometres from Moscow to Beijing that would cut the journey time from six days on the celebrated Trans-Siberian to two, Chinese media reported Friday.

The project would cost more than $230 billion and be over 7,000 kilometres (4,350 miles) long, the Beijing Times reported -- more than three times the world's current longest high-speed line, from the Chinese capital to the southern city of Guangzhou.

The railway would be a powerful physical symbol of the ties that bind Moscow and Beijing, whose political relationship has roots dating from the Soviet era and who often vote together on the UN Security Council.

They have strengthened their relationship as Western criticism of Russian President Vladimir Putin mounts over Ukraine and other issues.

The two signed a memorandum of understanding earlier this week during Premier Li Keqiang's visit to Moscow in which Beijing expressed interest in building a fast rail link between the Russian capital and Kazan in the oil-rich Tatarstan region, state broadcaster China Central Television reported.

The 803-kilometre line would be the first stage of the route to Beijing, CCTV said.

At present, trains between the two run along the Trans-Siberian railway that links Moscow and Vladivostok, before switching to a branch line heading south through the Mongolian capital Ulan Bator.

Direct passenger trains between Beijing and Moscow went into operation in 1954 and there are still two services per week, CCTV said.

The new link would cut the train travel time from six days at present to under two days, the Beijing Times quoted Wang Mengshu, a tunnel and railway expert at the Chinese Academy of Engineering, as saying.

"If the funds are raised smoothly... the line can be completed in five years at the quickest," he added.

The paper cited a research report that put the cost of one kilometre of Chinese-built fast rail at $33 million.

The country has the world's largest high-speed rail network, built from scratch in less than a decade, relying on technology transfer from foreign companies, including France's Alstom, Germany's Siemens and Japan's Kawasaki Heavy Industries.

Its reputation was tarnished after a bullet train collision in July 2011 near the eastern city of Wenzhou that killed at least 40 people and injured hundreds.

But China is now keen to promote the export of its technology, and has been building high-speed rail networks in Turkey and Venezuela.
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!


66c361fbf8dd8d26502ce65ce6bc393bfe7562b4.jpg
 

Lethe

Captain
$230bn is one hell of a symbol. There would have to be an economic case for such a project and, non-specialist as I am, I just don't see it.

However I would note that this isn't coming out of the blue -- we've been hearing of Chinese proposals to make all roads lead to Beijing for a while now:

7w1ivwl.jpg
 

delft

Brigadier
To integrate the economies of Asia and Europe large flows of people in all directions are necessary. Railways are to be preferred because they have large capacities, don't cause a lot of noise to people living around the stations in the way airports do and don't necessarily use fossil fuel. Aircraft fly at 900 km/h but you have add to your flying time hours on the airports on both ends as well as often hours getting to and from the airports.
The high speed line will preferrably be build at standard gage, 1435 mm, and be extended to Berlin and eventually Dublin.
Remember how, long ago, the French internal air passenger network was killed off by TGV. I suppose a considerable air passenger network will remain in Eurasia but it will be much smaller than otherwise necessary.
 
Last edited:
Top