Jura The idiot
General
44 minutes ago
Tam?
a seemingly missing one red point is at [4.0; 32] (there's a blue point at [4.0; 32] too), which I now checked LOL!
can you see this:first correcting etc. 47 minutes ago
KAShM =
KLAM =
'a Buk' for what I called "Shtil" above: at the bottom of
(I was guessing a half of ton 47 minutes ago LOL anyway rounded now the total load to integer tons)
will plot soon
Tam?
EDITYou're computing tubes. Things start to look different and the graph radically changes when you start to compute by missile weight.
Using internet sources, HQ-16 is said to be 615 kg, and the HQ-9 is about 1300 kg. With 32 missiles, a Type 054 carries about 19,680 kg of SAM weight. YJ-83 is said to be around 715 kg of weight, and 8 of them adds 5,720kg. This adds up to a total of 25,400 kg of missile weight. The Type 054A has a full load of just over 4000 tons.
The Type 052D has a full load of 7,500 tons. It carries 64 HQ-9s or have some missiles substitute that. 64 HQ-9s have a total of 83,200 kg of weight. That's actually 3 x over that of the 054A. The HQ-9 does not fully occupy the space of the U-VLS, as the HQ-9 ends with a 6.8m in length, and the U-VLS has 7m and 9m variants. The 9m cells are designed to hold missiles that are bigger than the HQ-9. I could not get weight figures of the YJ-18, but Russian Klub missiles, which the YJ-18 is similar or copied from, ranges from 1300kg to 2300kg depending on Klub family member. The YJ-12 is a humongous 2500 kg. So its possible that the 052D can carry more than 83,000kg of missile weight. So for a ship that has less than double the weight of the other, it can carry more than three times the "war weight".
a seemingly missing one red point is at [4.0; 32] (there's a blue point at [4.0; 32] too), which I now checked LOL!
Last edited: