This will be very effective for the ROC. It is designed to give them early warning for ballistic missiles, which travel very quickly...launched particularly from China or North Korea. For that, it fills the bill very, very well.
Only 240° coverage hmmmmm, what if China swirls around the radar and attack it from its blind spot? China is working on destroyers and subs with LACM. This is a huge intelligence asset for Taiwan and the US but i don't know how effective this will be during war.
If the Chinese were to move a SSBN to the blinf spot and launch from only a few milws off shore, he ROC would not have any early warniong in any case that would do them any good because at that range it would arrive to quickly and would likely be nuclear. Otherwise, they will be launching much slower cruise missiles from the blind spot to "this" radar, but certainly not to other radars perfectly capable of detecting them.
For LACMs they already have coverage from their E-2C Hawkeyes which regularly patrol, and from other radars already on the mountain tops.
LACMs move slowly, and are close to the water. With those other radars, they are likely to get a lot more warning (because of the slow speed) than what they will get from this radar for mainland launched ballistic missiles (perhaps 10-15 minites).
But that early warning can make a huge difference in terms of their anti-ballistic missiles being able to target and fire at the incoming missiles in an effort to destroy as many as possible.
If you were impressed with it when reading about it, it was because of its capabilities and design, and in that case, it remains impressive no matter who built it.jobjed said:I was pretty impressed with this whole thing until I reached the line "Raytheon build". Just another foreign system sold to the highest bidder, nothing impressive about this whole thing at all.
The ROC came up with the design parameteres and they found a partner in the free market who could construct the technology they were seeking...and when they did not have some key components and capabilities themselves. Nothing wrong with that.
They now have a critical capability that they otherwise would not have had. And they were the innovators and financeers, so in truth, it is "theirs," and does not represent some overt control Raytheon or anyone else has over the ROC. It represents a new capability the ROC has, that they came up with, and that they helped design and purchase.
Last edited: