Interesting that if the J-21/J-31 is a result of stolen info from Lockheed subcontractors, then why all the points of how it's different from all the F-35 sacrifices made in design. It's all superficial because you can just look at the fighter and get the same information instead of stealing it if it was that simple.
Ahhh Bill I missed you!
Looks like the F-35 bashers will resort to using the J-31 as an example of "what the JSF could've been".
I already called it few pages ago, the "Chinese copycat" is going to flood the internet, this is just the first salvo.
Because in the mind of Western observer, China can never come up anything original, even if they did, it must because they have stolen it from someone else. The collective butthurt mentality is very strong.
Because in the mind of Western observer, China can never come up anything original, even if they did, it must because they have stolen it from someone else. The collective butthurt mentality is very strong.
I think it's cliche and expected. But as before when the J-20 was impossible for China, now they've relegated themselves to China is not dynamic enough for two stealth fighters which yesterday just threw all that out the window.
I think it's cliche and expected. But as before when the J-20 was impossible for China, now they've relegated themselves to China is not dynamic enough for two stealth fighters which yesterday just threw all that out the window.
On a side note... does anyone know how many members does CJDB have? They have a thread on this that has already gone 43 pages in like one day.
Easily in the 10s of thousands on an average day. Must've been in the millions when the J-20 first came out because the server ended up crashing due to the high number of visitors.
31001? J-31? The eagle emblem on tail seems Pratt & Withney emblem...