Russian Military News, Reports, Data, etc.

minusone

Junior Member
Registered Member
Turkey was forced to buy S400 that forever changed Turkish economic and culture to Arab influence and there whole set of economic things that has tied now Turkey to Russia.
have you fought war under NATO sensors? why you think its disappointing.
show me any other fighter with internal bays that can carry so heavy external fuel tanks. It is designed for for heavy loads on structure. so naturally tests will take long time when you consider all altitudes G loads.
external pods also tested.

View attachment 104740
View attachment 104741
Well

1673372233736.png
 

Stealthflanker

Senior Member
Registered Member
The difference is huge, AGM has no concern over friendly fire upon launching, whereas there's high chance of friendly fire for AAM. Go figure.

So where is the "difference of pressure" concern you touted before ? Or you already forgotten what you are posting ? Let me screenshot it for you.

Screenshot 2023-01-11 at 00-49-23 Russian Military News Reports Data etc.png

and then this
Screenshot 2023-01-11 at 00-50-42 Russian Military News Reports Data etc.jpg

and now you reply with friendly fire ? Remember i showed you the video the weapon bay is used it released weapon safely. Nw it's your turn to explain your argument.

Can't admit to pull things out of the blue eh ?


You brought up examples of nations aka South korea and Israel to prove the usefulness of SU-34 as they operate F15. And i respond with South Korea couldn't even intercept north korea drone and lost a jet in pursuit,

You clearly have lost touch to your own argument and cannot back it any further. My points stands. Even non-stealthy bombers or Fighter bombers are still relevant. Those two nations still keep their F-15's
 

pmc

Major
Registered Member
The picture does not tell anything about size of tank nor about its operational viability.
while these white large tanks are part of operational Ruaf for battlefield. it is too ensure combine air arms have similar persistence.
Su-34 is Ruaf EW aircraft as its only this one that is integrated with EW pods on centerline. so it need tank not only on centerline but also on wings depend on mission.
1673394638181.png
1673394692949.png
 

minusone

Junior Member
Registered Member
So where is the "difference of pressure" concern you touted before ? Or you already forgotten what you are posting ? Let me screenshot it for you.

View attachment 104755

and then this
View attachment 104756

and now you reply with friendly fire ? Remember i showed you the video the weapon bay is used it released weapon safely. Nw it's your turn to explain your argument.

Can't admit to pull things out of the blue eh ?




You clearly have lost touch to your own argument and cannot back it any further. My points stands. Even non-stealthy bombers or Fighter bombers are still relevant. Those two nations still keep their F-15's
AGM just need to be dropped, AAM need to secure placement upon launching the propulsion hence more affected by differential pressure region created by the central lift intake design of Su57.

If you can't comprehend such simple logic, there's no point in continuing such discussion.

Opinion aren't facts, Ukraine war revealed the obvious. It's either Russian airforce, or the old doctrine of war is not working anymore. Choose 1.
 

minusone

Junior Member
Registered Member
The picture does not tell anything about size of tank nor about its operational viability.
while these white large tanks are part of operational Ruaf for battlefield. it is too ensure combine air arms have similar persistence.
Su-34 is Ruaf EW aircraft as its only this one that is integrated with EW pods on centerline. so it need tank not only on centerline but also on wings depend on mission.
View attachment 104775
View attachment 104776
It does tell you the size of the tank, you just need to scale up proportionately with J20 dimension. Simple.
 

gelgoog

Lieutenant General
Registered Member
Your argument is retarded. Flankers can carry air to air missiles in between the engines and can launch them from that position just fine.

yZQgmcX.png

TDrrIKK.png


There is no reason why launching air to air missiles from the recessed bays in between the engines in the Su-57 should cause any problems.
 

minusone

Junior Member
Registered Member
Your argument is retarded. Flankers can carry air to air missiles in between the engines and can launch them from that position just fine.

yZQgmcX.png

TDrrIKK.png


There is no reason why launching air to air missiles from the recessed bays in between the engines in the Su-57 should cause any problems.
Your argument is retarded. Now we have internal weapon bay included in the equation.

You are welcomed to provide footage to clear the air, instead of resorting to insult ( a sign of losing fact).
 

pmc

Major
Registered Member
It does tell you the size of the tank, you just need to scale up proportionately with J20 dimension. Simple.
the picture is blurry some tanks look wider and some narrower. and no information about operational deployment.
once upon a time a MIG-29 TVC was developed spend decades refining it and not deployed on MIG-29K.
Sukhoi has this experience that plane need to be taller from the round to get the larger pods and ETs on Centre line. it gives confidence about there work on Su-57.
1673405705225.png
 
Top