Russian Military News, Reports, Data, etc.

Stealthflanker

Senior Member
Registered Member
yet but they want go in this direction. they also doing alot of research on batteries now. so highly likely things will change with time.

They already have like 2 decades now since development of D-27 in some 2000's. The fact it still doesnt yield anything in their conventional submarine is kinda telling.

So I would say they have the technology.

They always have. Like Russians experimented with Hydrogen-Oxygen fuel cell system as early as 50's and have P.615 Submarine with liquid oxygen storage system for a closed cycle diesel engine. But nothing more comes out of that, especially after Nuclear boats appear.
 

Soldier30

Senior Member
Registered Member
Footage of Russian military personnel training on the Terminator tank support combat vehicle. Previously, there were rumors that they would not be used, but judging by the video, the Russian Ministry of Defense will not abandon these combat vehicles and this project will continue to develop. It is worth noting that the video shows a new combat vehicle, without noticeable signs of wear. As the mechanic driver of the BMPT "Terminator" said in a short interview at the end of the video, the BMPT "Terminator" can evacuate from the battlefield on its own, without the help of evacuation equipment and without one track. According to him, it only takes a month to retrain from operating the BMP-1 to the BMPT Terminator combat vehicle.

 

gelgoog

Lieutenant General
Registered Member
Another Borei-A SSBN has been built. This is the 5th Borei-A. Since there are another 3 Borei submarines with the original configuration this means 8 boats have been built total thus far.

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
The nuclear submarine "Prince Pozharsky" was removed from the boathouse in Severodvinsk
3 February 2024

ju8my.jpg


On February 3, in Severodvinsk at Sevmash, a solemn ceremony was held for the launching of the nuclear submarine cruiser “Prince Pozharsky” of the “Borei-A” project, Izvestia correspondent Leonid Kitrar reports.

The event was held under the leadership of the Commander-in-Chief of the Russian Navy, Admiral Nikolai Evmenov. In addition, representatives of the leadership of the Arkhangelsk region, Severodvinsk, the United Shipbuilding Corporation and industry took part in the ceremony. The start of the withdrawal of the cruiser from the boathouse was given by Sevmash General Director Mikhail Budnichenko.

According to Evmenov, this ceremony once again confirms the course towards strengthening and developing strategic nuclear forces. This complex embodies the most advanced technological solutions, as well as the experience and traditions of domestic submarine shipbuilding, it will strengthen the combat potential of the Navy, he added.

After leaving the boathouse, “Prince Pozharsky” will undergo both factory and state tests. They will be provided by the ship's crew, the Sevmash delivery team, the military representative office, and the Belomorsk naval base. After all the tests have been passed, the date of acceptance of the complex into the Navy will become known.

“The crew has completed all types of training and now, together with the factory workers, will prepare the ship for commissioning in the Navy in a timely manner,” Evmenov said.

Earlier that day, the Commander-in-Chief of the Navy checked the progress of work at the Zvezdochka and Sevmash enterprises in Severodvinsk. He heard reports from the heads of enterprises on the implementation of the state defense order plan in the field of ship repair and nuclear submarine shipbuilding of the country.
...
 
Last edited:

Soldier30

Senior Member
Registered Member
The commander of the Russian BMPT "Terminator" spoke about the advantages of the combat vehicle over tanks. The crew of the Terminator combat vehicle fires from a 30-mm 2A42 automatic cannon.

 

Soldier30

Senior Member
Registered Member
In Russia, they have developed mini ports for drones, the Kopter-L01-5 and Eri-Mini systems produced by Almaz-Antey. Such droneports can be controlled both manually and automatically. "Eri-Mini" is capable of working with the famous DJi Mavic 3 drones or Russian Geoscan-801 drones. Drone ports are integrated into the security system and are used to counter airspace violators, allowing the rapid launch of interceptor drones. When using drone ports, it only takes 1 minute to get your drone ready to fly. The droneport is capable of operating at temperatures from -30ºС to +45ºС; it charges the drone’s battery through an autonomous station in 45 minutes. The complex uses neural networks to recognize objects.

 

MarKoz81

Junior Member
Registered Member
Just dropping by with a data update:

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

Alexandr Shishkin's navy-korabel.livejournal.com updated the list of current Russian navy procurement on 1st January 2024

2024.01.01_navy_procurement.jpg
Alexandr Shishkin is the most reliable Russian naval blogger and his posts regularly serve as sources for other publications or Wikipedia updates. I'm stressing this because this new updated list does not include several positions from previous list from 1st July 2023, including all ships with contracts signed in 2022 and 2023, as well as several ships with contracts signed in August of 2020 (!). This has never happened before, and Shishkin is well known for keeping his sources up to date and keeping a constant watch on Russian naval developments. If there are rumours in the Russian press, statements from shipyard staff and Shishkin doesn't list it then I don't trust it.

Here's the previous list from 1st July 2023 with indicated delayed projects (in red) and estimated years of delay (number of dots). All the ships not in green or blue are gone. Only two Impr. Ivan Gren ships are added but without any further detail as to contract dates.
2023.07.01_navy_procurement_w_delays.jpg
Comparison:
classtypemissingcurrent totalpreviously planned total
BoreiSSBN21012
YasenSSGN2810
LadaSSK156
Impr. KiloSSK41216
Impr. Admiral GorshkovFFG/DDG303
Admiral GorshkovFFG5611
GremyashchiyFFC257
SteregushchiyFFC257

Fewer Kilos means no submarines for the Baltic Fleet. It seems improbable considering the speed of their construction so far but arguably it isn't the worst idea since the Baltic has become officially a NATO lake. Ten Boreis is the minimum level for deterrence with two persistent patrols at sea. Ten SSBNs is also the minimum for USN.

The five missing Gorshkovs are a surprise. It means that there has been no additional ship in the (very needed) class started in three preceding years; 2021, 2022 and 2023, and likely there are no plans for 2024. In july of 2023 Shishkin posted on the expected laying down of the keel for first two Improved Gorshkov ships. He based it on a state report designating the completion of R&D phase for Project 22350M in December of 2023. The expected date is around Navy Day in July of 2024. If that doesn't happen then it can only mean that the Russian Navy lost the battle in the Kremlin and is getting taken to the woodshed.

This is list of current fleet status for 1st January 2024:

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

Note the number of SSNs - out of 13 nominally in service only four are available.

This projection (end of post) could prove to have been too optimistic:


----------------

This is table of equipment stocks according to The Military Balance for 2016 and 2021, Polish publicist Jaroslaw Wolski (YT) for 2016, and Institute Action Resilience for 2021, as well as combat losses and remaining equipment (TMB 2021 minus losses) by Oryx and estimates of reserves and withdrawals in 2023 by Covert Cabal (YT).
Ru AFV stocks and losses.jpg
Ru Arty stocks and losses.jpg
Number of T-72s and T-80 in reserve (CC) are static because of missing parts as pre-2022 T-72 and T-80 were upgraded using old stock. These require full remanufacture which is not possible at current rate of factory occupancy with 100% of tanks requiring full overhaul after frontline use.

Also this, from 31 Dec 2022:


Additional equipment required for expansion:

if 3 regiments per division:
  • Ground Forces - 1260 tanks, 1250 ifvs
  • Naval Infantry - 400 tanks, 900 ifvs
  • Airborne - 360 ifvs
  • total - 1660 tanks, 2610 ifvs
if 2 regiments per division:
  • Ground Forces - 360 tanks, 810 ifvs
  • Naval Infantry - 200 tanks, 450 ifvs
  • Airborne - 180 ifvs
  • total - 560 tanks, 1440 ifvs
Cosidering the scale of losses, and currently calculated reserve stocks by IAR and CC (TMB had indicative quantities) it seems Russia is barely managing to keep the pre-war levels for tanks, without full expansion. For IFV/APC and artillery they should be somewhat capable of expanding with BMP-1s. MT-LB losses can be replaced but will use up most of reserves which matters as it is the most useful all-terrain tractor. The quantity of 2A36, D-20, D-30 and MT-12 reactivated is too high compard to 2S1 and 2S3 which suggests that towed systems are harvested for barrels in record numbers. If this continues through to 2025 Russia will be out of reserves and considering mechanical wear of vehicles the same will apply there. The main strategic advantage that Russia held before 2022 which made it a credible threat in a conventional conflict will be gone, with nothing gained in return.

All the Vatniks here would be in shambles if they were intelligent enough to know what is going on. At least the people in Kremlin are just as completely confused. What a spectacular shitshow.
 

TK3600

Major
Registered Member
Just dropping by with a data update:

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

Alexandr Shishkin's navy-korabel.livejournal.com updated the list of current Russian navy procurement on 1st January 2024

View attachment 124845
Alexandr Shishkin is the most reliable Russian naval blogger and his posts regularly serve as sources for other publications or Wikipedia updates. I'm stressing this because this new updated list does not include several positions from previous list from 1st July 2023, including all ships with contracts signed in 2022 and 2023, as well as several ships with contracts signed in August of 2020 (!). This has never happened before, and Shishkin is well known for keeping his sources up to date and keeping a constant watch on Russian naval developments. If there are rumours in the Russian press, statements from shipyard staff and Shishkin doesn't list it then I don't trust it.

Here's the previous list from 1st July 2023 with indicated delayed projects (in red) and estimated years of delay (number of dots). All the ships not in green or blue are gone. Only two Impr. Ivan Gren ships are added but without any further detail as to contract dates.
View attachment 124846
Comparison:
classtypemissingcurrent totalpreviously planned total
BoreiSSBN21012
YasenSSGN2810
LadaSSK156
Impr. KiloSSK41216
Impr. Admiral GorshkovFFG/DDG303
Admiral GorshkovFFG5611
GremyashchiyFFC257
SteregushchiyFFC257

Fewer Kilos means no submarines for the Baltic Fleet. It seems improbable considering the speed of their construction so far but arguably it isn't the worst idea since the Baltic has become officially a NATO lake. Ten Boreis is the minimum level for deterrence with two persistent patrols at sea. Ten SSBNs is also the minimum for USN.

The five missing Gorshkovs are a surprise. It means that there has been no additional ship in the (very needed) class started in three preceding years; 2021, 2022 and 2023, and likely there are no plans for 2024. In july of 2023 Shishkin posted on the expected laying down of the keel for first two Improved Gorshkov ships. He based it on a state report designating the completion of R&D phase for Project 22350M in December of 2023. The expected date is around Navy Day in July of 2024. If that doesn't happen then it can only mean that the Russian Navy lost the battle in the Kremlin and is getting taken to the woodshed.

This is list of current fleet status for 1st January 2024:

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

Note the number of SSNs - out of 13 nominally in service only four are available.

This projection (end of post) could prove to have been too optimistic:


----------------

This is table of equipment stocks according to The Military Balance for 2016 and 2021, Polish publicist Jaroslaw Wolski (YT) for 2016, and Institute Action Resilience for 2021, as well as combat losses and remaining equipment (TMB 2021 minus losses) by Oryx and estimates of reserves and withdrawals in 2023 by Covert Cabal (YT).
View attachment 124849
View attachment 124850
Number of T-72s and T-80 in reserve (CC) are static because of missing parts as pre-2022 T-72 and T-80 were upgraded using old stock. These require full remanufacture which is not possible at current rate of factory occupancy with 100% of tanks requiring full overhaul after frontline use.

Also this, from 31 Dec 2022:


Additional equipment required for expansion:

if 3 regiments per division:
  • Ground Forces - 1260 tanks, 1250 ifvs
  • Naval Infantry - 400 tanks, 900 ifvs
  • Airborne - 360 ifvs
  • total - 1660 tanks, 2610 ifvs
if 2 regiments per division:
  • Ground Forces - 360 tanks, 810 ifvs
  • Naval Infantry - 200 tanks, 450 ifvs
  • Airborne - 180 ifvs
  • total - 560 tanks, 1440 ifvs
Cosidering the scale of losses, and currently calculated reserve stocks by IAR and CC (TMB had indicative quantities) it seems Russia is barely managing to keep the pre-war levels for tanks, without full expansion. For IFV/APC and artillery they should be somewhat capable of expanding with BMP-1s. MT-LB losses can be replaced but will use up most of reserves which matters as it is the most useful all-terrain tractor. The quantity of 2A36, D-20, D-30 and MT-12 reactivated is too high compard to 2S1 and 2S3 which suggests that towed systems are harvested for barrels in record numbers. If this continues through to 2025 Russia will be out of reserves and considering mechanical wear of vehicles the same will apply there. The main strategic advantage that Russia held before 2022 which made it a credible threat in a conventional conflict will be gone, with nothing gained in return.

All the Vatniks here would be in shambles if they were intelligent enough to know what is going on. At least the people in Kremlin are just as completely confused. What a spectacular shitshow.
Those equipments will rot in storage anyways. That stockpile advantage will last much longer. May as well let them go out with a bang by solving the Ukraine issue. The expectation is by 2025, Russia may begin to suffer shortage, but western support will suffer more severe shortage than Russia. As of 2024, this seems to be true.

Russian navy is just LOL at this point. It should give up the superpower navy ambition and settle for only self defense and subs for nuclear triad. Let PLAN do the heavy lifting from now.
 
Top