Re: Georgia Attacks South Ossetia, War With Russia Looms
From internet sources, Russian RPG round with tandem warhead can defeat ERA and penetrate 500mm-750mm RHA armor, versus export quality T-72's had 250mm-400mm RHA rated armor depending on location (without ERA). I'd assume the Russians supplied the local militia with anti-tank RPG rounds.
During the Chechnya conflict, the Chechen rebels had to fire 7-8 RPG rounds to disable a single T-72. But they only had access to older RPG ammunition and not the newer anti-tank stuff.
I'm also surprised to see Russian T-62's being deployed. Perhaps these are from a frontier guard division? Even by Russian standards these are pretty old.
There's also some confusion as to who owns what tank. Both Russia and Georgia use T-72AV with ERA upgrade, so it's kinda hard to ID owner when it's a burning hulk. Also, some tanks were probably captured and put back into service by the other side. I've seen several pictures of abandoned Georgian T-72's being put into service by Ossetian forces.
I also read a few speculations:
1) Russian tankers only carry ammo in the autoloader, and no spare rounds. So when hit it'd improve their survival chance. Georgian tankers didn't do this and their destroyed tanks are more likely to have flipped turrets.
2) Tanks destroyed from the top & look like a burning hulk are more likely to be from air strike or artillery hit, versus those with turret intact is more likely from a RPG or ATGM penetrating the turret ring or sides.
Is this an upgraded T-80? Does anyone have a confirmed T-80 MBT photo in current conflict zone?
As for the T-72: I will wait for more info, but at this point I'm leaning towards negative. Georgian T-72s suffered quite a few casualties at the hands of the South Ossetians, and they were only armed with RPGs. The reactive armour did little, apparently.
From internet sources, Russian RPG round with tandem warhead can defeat ERA and penetrate 500mm-750mm RHA armor, versus export quality T-72's had 250mm-400mm RHA rated armor depending on location (without ERA). I'd assume the Russians supplied the local militia with anti-tank RPG rounds.
During the Chechnya conflict, the Chechen rebels had to fire 7-8 RPG rounds to disable a single T-72. But they only had access to older RPG ammunition and not the newer anti-tank stuff.
I'm also surprised to see Russian T-62's being deployed. Perhaps these are from a frontier guard division? Even by Russian standards these are pretty old.
There's also some confusion as to who owns what tank. Both Russia and Georgia use T-72AV with ERA upgrade, so it's kinda hard to ID owner when it's a burning hulk. Also, some tanks were probably captured and put back into service by the other side. I've seen several pictures of abandoned Georgian T-72's being put into service by Ossetian forces.
I also read a few speculations:
1) Russian tankers only carry ammo in the autoloader, and no spare rounds. So when hit it'd improve their survival chance. Georgian tankers didn't do this and their destroyed tanks are more likely to have flipped turrets.
2) Tanks destroyed from the top & look like a burning hulk are more likely to be from air strike or artillery hit, versus those with turret intact is more likely from a RPG or ATGM penetrating the turret ring or sides.
Is this an upgraded T-80? Does anyone have a confirmed T-80 MBT photo in current conflict zone?
Last edited: