Reason for China building WMDs

rice

New Member
MIGleader said:
too risky. that would be stretching the limit of the missle to the brink, and youd have to count in wind speeds, atmospheric conditions,....plus the missle would be flying to long and would be detected.

we're not talking about the risk, you said china has no missiles that can reach washington DC, that's false. DF-5s can reach washington DC with plenty of fuel to spare
 

tphuang

Lieutenant General
Staff member
Super Moderator
VIP Professional
Registered Member
renmin said:
oh I see, you can't find much information on the type94, it has not been updated for a long time. does any one have any more information on the JL-2 because it is defenantly not here.
What do you need to know on it, I have posted plenty of stuff on 094 in the navy section of this board.

As for DF-31, it's first flight was in 1992. Didn't China already have 092 by then? I'm sure China thought about making something that can be launched from SSBNs and be launched half way around the world.

We know, JL-2 was tested this year, probably on 092.
 

renmin

Junior Member
tphuang said:
What do you need to know on it, I have posted plenty of stuff on 094 in the navy section of this board.

As for DF-31, it's first flight was in 1992. Didn't China already have 092 by then? I'm sure China thought about making something that can be launched from SSBNs and be launched half way around the world.

We know, JL-2 was tested this year, probably on 092.
I still don't understand the basic layout of type 94 like its size, surely it has to be quite big to house 16 JL-2s, is it as large as those american trident subs?
 

renmin

Junior Member
tphuang said:
http://www.sinodefenceforum.com/showthread.php?t=793
This has the article by a Taiwanese military magazine on China's submarine force. I translated the section on 094 already, so you can just check that out.
Wow, thanks, so the type094 has already been built.Can that seriously carry 16 DF-31s because I was expecting it to be much larger than that. it seems like the JL-2s are housed in the middle of the sub and the type94 is armed with four torpedoes. this is going to be difficult to read
 

tphuang

Lieutenant General
Staff member
Super Moderator
VIP Professional
Registered Member
here is another article:
2005823193018124130eb.jpg

As for JL-2, each JL-2 has 6 warheads I think? So, it can strike 96 targets, which increases the number of targets it can hit by 8 times.

Anyhow, this article says that 094 is probably going to be commissionned in 2007/2008, because it's likely to start sea trials this year. The real factor of its deployment depends on JL-2's release.
 

adeptitus

Captain
VIP Professional
MIGleader said:
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

at least its "finished"

Here's a good URL to world ballistic missile data:
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!


It's worth noting that on Globalsecurity, they list the JL-2 has being equipped with either a signle warhead or 3-4 (100kt) MIRV warheads, versus the above site claim the JL-2 could be armed with 3-8 (20kt - 90kt) MIRV warheads.
 
Last edited:

MIGleader

Banned Idiot
tphuang said:
here is another article:
As for JL-2, each JL-2 has 6 warheads I think? So, it can strike 96 targets, which increases the number of targets it can hit by 8 times.

Anyhow, this article says that 094 is probably going to be commissionned in 2007/2008, because it's likely to start sea trials this year. The real factor of its deployment depends on JL-2's release.

thats interesting. strategy center claims the boat has already entered service.

i guess 3-4 is inclusive in 3-8. you can never get sources to agree
 

Sea Dog

Junior Member
VIP Professional
MIGleader said:
thats interesting. strategy center claims the boat has already entered service.

i guess 3-4 is inclusive in 3-8. you can never get sources to agree

True. But I think the 3-8 figure is with a reduced yield (up to 90kt.) . The 3-4 has a 100kt. yield. So they're saying you can put more warheads on at a reduction in nuclear payload.

@remnin & tphuang - Thanks guys for the links. These verify some other data I've seen regarding DF-31.
 

chinawhite

Banned Idiot
tphuang


**-As for DF-31, it's first flight was in 1992. -**

Its first flight was in 1990's But its development period started in 1978. like i said before the design was already finalized and the period after that was development.

Regards,

Chinawhite
 
Top