Infra_Man99
Banned Idiot
Re: PLAN submarines Thread II
Yeah, I was guilty of somewhat putting words in Ambi's mouth, but, in ONE of Ambi's postings, he was sort of describing anti-sub helicopters as having an easy time defeating a sub. He talked about helicopters with dipping sonars supported by S-3B/P-3/whatever-EM-sensing-planes and sonobuoys (active and passive). He said this system could clearly defeat a submarine without pointing out this system's complexitites, and he ignored dealing with multiple combatants.
He compared a team consisting of at least one land-based airfield, at least 2 destroyers/cruisers or 1 aircraft carrier, multiple aircrafts, probably satellite communications, probably depth charges, and maybe other supporting platforms against 1 submarine. It's like someone saying this about the NFL: "That team has a good wide reciever, but all we gotta do is get a good quarterback, a good coaching staff, a good medical and fitness team, a good offensive team, and a defensive team. Then we'll be able to crush that opposing wide reciever. Piece of cake." I am staring at this guy, and wondering if he being Captain Obvious or maybe his knowledge is too much for me to grasp.
I replied to Ambi 'cuz I wanted to clarify the degree of difficulty the situation actually was, and Ambi responded with clarification using interesting stories.
Yeah, I was guilty of somewhat putting words in Ambi's mouth, but, in ONE of Ambi's postings, he was sort of describing anti-sub helicopters as having an easy time defeating a sub. He talked about helicopters with dipping sonars supported by S-3B/P-3/whatever-EM-sensing-planes and sonobuoys (active and passive). He said this system could clearly defeat a submarine without pointing out this system's complexitites, and he ignored dealing with multiple combatants.
He compared a team consisting of at least one land-based airfield, at least 2 destroyers/cruisers or 1 aircraft carrier, multiple aircrafts, probably satellite communications, probably depth charges, and maybe other supporting platforms against 1 submarine. It's like someone saying this about the NFL: "That team has a good wide reciever, but all we gotta do is get a good quarterback, a good coaching staff, a good medical and fitness team, a good offensive team, and a defensive team. Then we'll be able to crush that opposing wide reciever. Piece of cake." I am staring at this guy, and wondering if he being Captain Obvious or maybe his knowledge is too much for me to grasp.
I replied to Ambi 'cuz I wanted to clarify the degree of difficulty the situation actually was, and Ambi responded with clarification using interesting stories.