PLAN Type 035/039/091/092 Submarine Thread

Quickie

Colonel
Re: PLAN submarines Thread II

CNY festival traditionally runs for 15 days; it ended about a week ago during the last full moon. So, yes, everything is to be back to full speed, but you know some things take time to return to normal after the long holidays.
 

B.I.B.

Captain
Re: PLAN submarines Thread II

Is the story concerning Russia being prepared to supply China with their new Kalina clas sub new news, old news , or no big deal?.
 

plawolf

Lieutenant General
Re: PLAN submarines Thread II

Near as I can tell the Kalina is still just a paper project.

If the offer was real and official, it seems more like a fishing expedition by the Russians to try the get the Chinese to help finance the development of this proposed new class.

To be honest, I'm not too sure the Russians hold much, if any, lead on China when it comes to conventional AIP subs, and with the trend in new Russian defence projects recently, by the time the Kalina is operational, China will probably have a better indigenous equivalent, if it doesn't already.

Russian offering to share nuclear sub technology with China would be a huge deal, as I think that is an area where China currently desperately needs to reform as there is a lot of entrenched interests using the necessary secrecy and high security of such strategic assets to effectively monopolize the market and protect ineffective individuals and organisations from any sort of real competition. Thus this removes almost all pressure for them to get their act right, which is why China's nuclear subs are still such a weakness.

I know for a fact that China has world class engineers and designers who proposed cutting edge nuclear sub designs and concepts way back in the late 90s and early 2000s which are only just coming online in the latest US and European classes. Had their proposals been given serious consideration, Chinese SSNs and SSBNs are almost certain to be far better than what they are now, and may well have closed the gap with the most advanced American and European classes to a generation or less.

The current Chinese nuclear sub maker is very similar to SAC back in the 90s and shares most if not more ills. But unlike the aviation industry, China's nuclear sub section only has one player , so there was never any real way the anyone could force it to shape up or have a realistic alternative the PLAN could turn to.
 

Totoro

Major
VIP Professional
Re: PLAN submarines Thread II

Kalina is most likely a new name for Lada/Amur development. Certainly not a brand new design.
 

TerraN_EmpirE

Tyrant King
Re: PLAN submarines Thread II

Project 636 Varshavyanka-class is the latest Kilo derivative in production.
Lada was more or less still born. and Amur seems to have gone no where.
Want China times
Russia to give China more advanced submarine technology
Staff Reporter 2014-03-25 15:12 (GMT+8)
The B-585 Sankt Peterburg, Russia's first and only completed Lada-class submarine. (Internet photo)
The B-585 Sankt Peterburg, Russia's first and only completed Lada-class submarine. (Internet photo)

Instead of providing the older Lada-class submarines to the People's Liberation Army Navy as requested by Beijing, Russia's president, Vladimir Putin, will likely authorize China to receive the more advanced Kalina-class submarine, reports the Voice of Russia, citing Vassily Kashin, a senior research fellow from the Moscow-based Center for Analysis of Strategies and Technologies.

Viktor Chirkov, the commander-in-chief of the Russian Navy, officially announced that the Kalina-class conventional submarine equipped with an advanced air-independent propulsion system will be developed and produced in the future on Mar. 20. "Russia is currently designing a fifth-generation conventional submarine, dubbed Project Kalina, which will be fitted with an air-independent propulsion (AIP) system," said Chirkov.

Authorities also declared that the construction of the older Lada-class submarine will be cancelled. The Lada-class, or Project 677, is a fourth-generation diesel-electric submarine based on the older Kilo-class submarine.

China was negotiating with Russia to purchase four Lada-class submarines from the Rubin Design Bureau based in St Petersburg. China hoped those submarines could be refitted with Chinese engines and an electronic fire-control system, according to the Canada-based Kanwa Defense Review.

As Russia remains isolated over its intervention in the Ukraine crisis, Moscow values China's position as one of its strategic partners, Kashin said. He added that the PLA Navy will benefit from the cancellation of the Lada-class as it will open a new door for China to gain more advanced technology from Russia to build its own submarine in the future. Meanwhile, China may be able to design its own fifth-generation conventional submarine with the help of Russia under this new concept, Kashin said.
Followed up with
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

Before them the Lada Class deal was tied with the Rumored SU35 Deal
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!


It may be possible for the Russians and Chinese to Joint development of a new SSP type with features and mission specs suited to Littoral operations and combining the best of PLAN and Russian Navy tech perhaps targeted in the Type 216 scale. but that's still hypothetical.
 

Jeff Head

General
Registered Member
Re: PLAN submarines Thread II

Is the story concerning Russia being prepared to supply China with their new Kalina clas sub new news, old news , or no big deal?.
I agree with wolf here.

With their latest Yuan design that we saw last year, I see no reason for the Chinese to buy Russian AIP D/E submarines. They are building their own and do so capably. If Russia is having such troubles improving their conventional subs to a newer AIP D/E design, perhaps they should make a deal to buy some of the Chinese subs.

I would view as highly suspect in any case any report on such issues from WantChinaTimes or other such sources. Not that they should not be read, and considered, just that there particular bias in these matters is pretty well known.
 

kroko

Senior Member
Re: PLAN submarines Thread II

These are very specialist vessels that require unique skills and equipment to build. If China wants any other shipyard to build nuclear subs, it needs to make substantial monetary investments, but more importantly, it needs to get the existing shipyard to share its skills and knowledge, and that is when the vested interest use national security as an excuse to strangle all serious competition.

It's basically a catch-22 situation. You need to demonstrate you have a viable design to get the PLAN to give your proposal serious consideration, but you can't have a viable design if the existing nuclear sub player won't cooperate with you to allow you to fill in the blanks since they control all shipborne reactor knowledge and skills.

Maybe once China starts building nuclear carriers things might start to improve as the current stranglehold on key technologies are broken. But tbh, for that to happen China really needs a shipyard other than Dalian to be able to build nuclear carriers as I have serious reservations about the management at Dalian.

I have doubts about what you say. No state organism can refuse an order from the government, specially a single-party state like china. The government knows what national security is and is not.

And out of curiosity, why do you have reservations about dalian shipyard management?
 

latenlazy

Brigadier
Re: PLAN submarines Thread II

I have doubts about what you say. No state organism can refuse an order from the government, specially a single-party state like china. The government knows what national security is and is not.

And out of curiosity, why do you have reservations about dalian shipyard management?

The state isn't monolithic. When orders and punishments travel down a chain, things get lost or hidden in the process.
 
Top