No VLS in the rear?
The photo in Attachment 44304 is undated - who knows what has happened to the ships since it was taken? A full comprehensive refit may well have taken place. Only examination of recent photos will prove whether or not the ship has VLS fore and aft and new SSM's fitted.still no YJ-12 and looks like U-VLS is not going to happen.
The photo in Attachment 44304 is undated - who knows what has happened to the ships since it was taken? A full comprehensive refit may well have taken place. Only examination of recent photos will prove whether or not the ship has VLS fore and aft and new SSM's fitted.
I think the best way to know whether the U VLS is installed on these ships it to have a high resolution picture. The main difference between the U VLS and the VLS used for the Type 54A is that the U VLS have no middle exhaust while the HQ-16 VLS has one. With such grainy photos it is near impossible to tell for certain.
Precisely. And your words are indeed good reminder to those who forgot it and kept on pointless arguing, attack, etc... ...True .... but the beauty of this forum is to predict what is not too clear ... educated guest, if you will
I would say it would be UVLS