PLAN Sovremenny DDG 136, 137, 138 & 139 Thread

schenkus

Junior Member
Registered Member
05-4334466-25.jpg


Looks realistic for midlife refit.

The HQ-10 launcher seems very close to the VLS, is that a realistic position ?
 

KIENCHIN

Junior Member
Registered Member
Well, according to this picture, it's already installed. (wrapped in green tarp)

CwedbocUoAA7hiU.jpg:large
It would be nice if they got rid of the aft 130 mm gun and mordernise the sensor suite and gun fire control rada. The ship dtill look cluttered and top heavy.
 

Iron Man

Major
Registered Member
It's too bad they installed an HHQ-10 launcher at the B position instead of a full bank of 2x2 VLS modules because now it is doubtful that 4 modules could fit in that space along with the HHQ-10 launcher. Here is a graphic of a Mk-41-sized VLS setup, assuming the HHQ-16 VLS modules are identical or very similar in size to Mk-41.

956 VLS.jpg

Incidentally, the rear area does not have enough room for 4 or even 3 VLS modules.

It would be nice if they got rid of the aft 130 mm gun and mordernise the sensor suite and gun fire control rada. The ship dtill look cluttered and top heavy.
If they got rid of the aft gun they could install a 2x2 VLS complex at that location and put a CIWS at the Buk launcher arm position.
 

Gloire_bb

Captain
Registered Member
24-cell modules are replacing her former 24-missile revolving magazines.
Rather cheap and reliable way to massively update their combat capabilities.


Increase will require very extensive(and expensive) work with not that much of additional return.
 

antiterror13

Brigadier
24-cell modules are replacing her former 24-missile revolving magazines.
Rather cheap and reliable way to massively update their combat capabilities.

Increase will require very extensive(and expensive) work with not that much of additional return.

how did you come up with 24 VLS?
 
Top