PLAN Carrier Strike Group and Airwing

adeptitus

Captain
VIP Professional
Re: Ideal chinese carrier thread

The Su-33 is from same generation as the F-18A/B. There's been various rumored Su-33 upgrades and product brochures, but I have yet to see them in operation.

The current generation of Su-33 is not really comparable to the Super Hornet. But if the upgrades described in these articles materialize, then it'd be a better comparison:

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
 

adeptitus

Captain
VIP Professional
Re: Ideal chinese carrier thread

The Su-33 is from same generation as the F-18A/B. There's been various rumored Su-33 upgrades and product brochures, but I have yet to see them in operation.

The current generation of Su-33 is not really comparable to the Super Hornet. But if the upgrades described in these articles materialize, then it'd be a better comparison:

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
 

Scratch

Captain
Re: Ideal chinese carrier thread

the SU-25 Frogfoots would make a good platform for an EW type as things stand.

Wouldn't they suffer from the same problems the Prowler did, wich is they might find it difficult to keep up with a Flanker package?
I think the Flanker with it's size should be able to carry a really powerfull EW suite and do so over distance and with speed. But then again there's the payload problem due to take off.
Fitting a AESA radar on their back for AEW duties would be an interesting concept...
 

Scratch

Captain
Re: Ideal chinese carrier thread

the SU-25 Frogfoots would make a good platform for an EW type as things stand.

Wouldn't they suffer from the same problems the Prowler did, wich is they might find it difficult to keep up with a Flanker package?
I think the Flanker with it's size should be able to carry a really powerfull EW suite and do so over distance and with speed. But then again there's the payload problem due to take off.
Fitting a AESA radar on their back for AEW duties would be an interesting concept...
 

Scratch

Captain
Re: Ideal chinese carrier thread

the SU-25 Frogfoots would make a good platform for an EW type as things stand.

Wouldn't they suffer from the same problems the Prowler did, wich is they might find it difficult to keep up with a Flanker package?
I think the Flanker with it's size should be able to carry a really powerfull EW suite and do so over distance and with speed. But then again there's the payload problem due to take off.
Fitting a AESA radar on their back for AEW duties would be an interesting concept...
 

Jeff Head

General
Registered Member
Re: Ideal chinese carrier thread

Wouldn't they suffer from the same problems the Prowler did, wich is they might find it difficult to keep up with a Flanker package?
I think the Flanker with it's size should be able to carry a really powerfull EW suite and do so over distance and with speed. But then again there's the payload problem due to take off.
Fitting a AESA radar on their back for AEW duties would be an interesting concept...
The Prowler has been a great aircraft. All weather, huge payload...but it does suffer in spped. That's why the EA-18G Growler is such a great replacement. It will fly right with the Superhornets with the same speed, all-weather, and a decent payload.

071108_growler_800.JPG


10nE0SWQO63zCgcyI3o23SUOF9b17g9i.jpg


The porcedures, equipment, technologies, service/maintenance, logistics, and policies regardging this level of support are all fine tuned and honed by the US Navy. Other nations, newly developing this level of support will have a tough learning curve to catch up.
 

Jeff Head

General
Registered Member
Re: Ideal chinese carrier thread

Wouldn't they suffer from the same problems the Prowler did, wich is they might find it difficult to keep up with a Flanker package?
I think the Flanker with it's size should be able to carry a really powerfull EW suite and do so over distance and with speed. But then again there's the payload problem due to take off.
Fitting a AESA radar on their back for AEW duties would be an interesting concept...
The Prowler has been a great aircraft. All weather, huge payload...but it does suffer in spped. That's why the EA-18G Growler is such a great replacement. It will fly right with the Superhornets with the same speed, all-weather, and a decent payload.

071108_growler_800.JPG


10nE0SWQO63zCgcyI3o23SUOF9b17g9i.jpg


The porcedures, equipment, technologies, service/maintenance, logistics, and policies regardging this level of support are all fine tuned and honed by the US Navy. Other nations, newly developing this level of support will have a tough learning curve to catch up.
 

Jeff Head

General
Registered Member
Re: Ideal chinese carrier thread

Wouldn't they suffer from the same problems the Prowler did, wich is they might find it difficult to keep up with a Flanker package?
I think the Flanker with it's size should be able to carry a really powerfull EW suite and do so over distance and with speed. But then again there's the payload problem due to take off.
Fitting a AESA radar on their back for AEW duties would be an interesting concept...
The Prowler has been a great aircraft. All weather, huge payload...but it does suffer in spped. That's why the EA-18G Growler is such a great replacement. It will fly right with the Superhornets with the same speed, all-weather, and a decent payload.

071108_growler_800.JPG


10nE0SWQO63zCgcyI3o23SUOF9b17g9i.jpg


The porcedures, equipment, technologies, service/maintenance, logistics, and policies regardging this level of support are all fine tuned and honed by the US Navy. Other nations, newly developing this level of support will have a tough learning curve to catch up.
 

adeptitus

Captain
VIP Professional
Re: Ideal chinese carrier thread

The Russians had an EW version of Su-33 under R&D, called SU-27KPP. However no actual product has been revealed to date. If the Russians are serious about building additional aircraft carriers, I think we'd see more investment in the Su-33 product. But for now, the current generation Su-33's are rather dated, and the proposed upgrade in 1999 hasn't materialized.

Let's look at Indian Navy's upgrades to the MiG-29K:
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

MiG-29K (Product 9.31)
Modification was made for Indian Navy requirement featured Zhuk-ME radar, RD-33MK engine, combat payload up to 5,500 kg, 13 hardpoints (inclusive of the multi-lock bomb carriers), additional fuel tanks situated in dorsal spine fairing and wing LERXs, increased total fuel capacity by 50% comparing to first variant of MiG-29 and updated 4-channel digital fly-by-wire flight control system. With special coatings MiG-29K radar reflecting surface is 4-5 times smaller than of basic MiG-29. Cockpit displays consist of wide HUD and 3 (7 on MiG-29KUB) colour LCD MFDs and French Sigma-95 satellite GPS module and Topsight E helmet-mounted targeting system. Compatible with the full range of weapons carried by the MiG-29M and MiG-29SMT.[25] NATO reporting code is Fulcrum-D.

And the proposed Su-33 upgrade from 1999:
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

A 1999 Sukhoi/KnAAPO/Rosvooruzheni brochure described a Su-33 Upgrade configuration, though there is no real evidence that any such programme has been funded. The cockpit is to gain two large colour LCD multifunction displays, with a modernised flight control/navigation system and enhanced air-to-ground capabilities. The upgraded Su-33 is to be compatible with the R-77 (AA-12 “Adder”) AAM and with a range of air-to-ground PGMs, including TV-guided Kh-29, Kh-59N, KAB-500Kr and KAB-1500Kr and laser-guided Kh-29L, KAB-500L, and KAB-1500L. The use of the Kh-31P will give the aircraft an effective SEAD capability.

Su-30K-2/Su-33UB proposed variant:
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

...New 'glass cockpit' with five colour LCD displays (one 53 cm; 21 in diagonally; rest 38 cm; 15 in) with provision for central or sidestick and with helmet-mounted sighting system. Aircraft has OBOGS and OBIGGS and so does not need oxygen or nitrogen bottles. N014 solid-state, phased-array radar, with enhanced air-to-ground and over-water capabilities...



I'd make an educated guess that the baseline MiG-29K and Su-33 products are 1980s level technology, and didn't fit India and China's requirements. If Indian Navy required many upgrades before accepting the MiG-29K, we can expect the PLAN, should they ever import the Su-33, to ask for similar upgrades. Perhaps Russian Navy would piggyback on the Chinese Su-33 upgrade projects too.

When you look inside a Su-33 cockpit today, this is probably what you'd see:
su27_7.jpg


Versus what China would prefer see instead:
su35cabina.jpg


If and when China gets Su-33's, expect many upgrades!
 

adeptitus

Captain
VIP Professional
Re: Ideal chinese carrier thread

The Russians had an EW version of Su-33 under R&D, called SU-27KPP. However no actual product has been revealed to date. If the Russians are serious about building additional aircraft carriers, I think we'd see more investment in the Su-33 product. But for now, the current generation Su-33's are rather dated, and the proposed upgrade in 1999 hasn't materialized.

Let's look at Indian Navy's upgrades to the MiG-29K:
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

MiG-29K (Product 9.31)
Modification was made for Indian Navy requirement featured Zhuk-ME radar, RD-33MK engine, combat payload up to 5,500 kg, 13 hardpoints (inclusive of the multi-lock bomb carriers), additional fuel tanks situated in dorsal spine fairing and wing LERXs, increased total fuel capacity by 50% comparing to first variant of MiG-29 and updated 4-channel digital fly-by-wire flight control system. With special coatings MiG-29K radar reflecting surface is 4-5 times smaller than of basic MiG-29. Cockpit displays consist of wide HUD and 3 (7 on MiG-29KUB) colour LCD MFDs and French Sigma-95 satellite GPS module and Topsight E helmet-mounted targeting system. Compatible with the full range of weapons carried by the MiG-29M and MiG-29SMT.[25] NATO reporting code is Fulcrum-D.

And the proposed Su-33 upgrade from 1999:
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

A 1999 Sukhoi/KnAAPO/Rosvooruzheni brochure described a Su-33 Upgrade configuration, though there is no real evidence that any such programme has been funded. The cockpit is to gain two large colour LCD multifunction displays, with a modernised flight control/navigation system and enhanced air-to-ground capabilities. The upgraded Su-33 is to be compatible with the R-77 (AA-12 “Adder”) AAM and with a range of air-to-ground PGMs, including TV-guided Kh-29, Kh-59N, KAB-500Kr and KAB-1500Kr and laser-guided Kh-29L, KAB-500L, and KAB-1500L. The use of the Kh-31P will give the aircraft an effective SEAD capability.

Su-30K-2/Su-33UB proposed variant:
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

...New 'glass cockpit' with five colour LCD displays (one 53 cm; 21 in diagonally; rest 38 cm; 15 in) with provision for central or sidestick and with helmet-mounted sighting system. Aircraft has OBOGS and OBIGGS and so does not need oxygen or nitrogen bottles. N014 solid-state, phased-array radar, with enhanced air-to-ground and over-water capabilities...



I'd make an educated guess that the baseline MiG-29K and Su-33 products are 1980s level technology, and didn't fit India and China's requirements. If Indian Navy required many upgrades before accepting the MiG-29K, we can expect the PLAN, should they ever import the Su-33, to ask for similar upgrades. Perhaps Russian Navy would piggyback on the Chinese Su-33 upgrade projects too.

When you look inside a Su-33 cockpit today, this is probably what you'd see:
su27_7.jpg


Versus what China would prefer see instead:
su35cabina.jpg


If and when China gets Su-33's, expect many upgrades!
 
Top