PLAN Carrier Construction

delft

Brigadier
Found at
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

UPDATE 2-State-backed China Shipbuilding to raise $1.4 bln for naval buildup

Wed Sep 11, 2013 10:48am IST

(Adds maritime analyst quote, details)

By Yimou Lee and Michael Martina

(Reuters) - State-backed China Shipbuilding Industry plans to raise up to $1.4 billion through a private share sale to buy assets used for building warships, the first time Beijing is tapping the capital market to fund its military expansion.

The move comes as China creates its own military-industrial complex, with the private sector seen taking a key role, as the country gains a new sense of military assertiveness and deals with a growing budget to develop modern equipment including aircraft carriers and drones.

China, whose military spending is now second only to the United States, has unveiled a double-digit rise in its 2013 military budget, with spending on the People's Liberation Army set to rise 10.7 percent to 740.6 billion yuan ($119 billion).

"The thinking of those high-ranking officials is changing. Military asset securitization, or tapping capital markets for military expansion, will be the future trend and the funding scale will also become bigger and bigger," said Wang Hexu, a Shanghai-based analyst at Hwabao Securities.

"Now aviation and weaponry may also be the next sectors for asset securitization," he said.

China Shipbuilding Industry Co Ltd (CSIC) said it plans to raise as much as 8.48 billion yuan ($1.4 billion) by selling up to 2.2 billion shares to as many as 10 selected investors. The investors include two sibling companies, Wuchang Shipbuilding and Dalian Shipbuilding, which are key builders of Chinese warships.

The company, a key supplier to the People's Liberation Army, said it was the first time China was going to the capital market to fund the buildup of its core military.

"The deal will expand the financing channels for China's military defense," China Shipbuilding said in a statement posted on the Shanghai Stock Exchange's website. "It would also herald an overall securitization of China's military assets."

NEW CARRIERS

Beijing last year issued new guidelines aimed at encouraging private investment in a defence sector traditionally sheltered from competition and public scrutiny.

Such investment would bode well for Chinese military-focused shipbuilders compared with commercial shipbuilders like Rongsheng Heavy Industries Group, which fell to a first-half loss and has requested financial help from the government.

China is expected to build one or more aircraft carriers over the next five to 10 years, with each carrier fleet costing nearly $20 billion, China Shipbuilding said, citing expert forecasts.

"CSIC has been rumoured to be one of those that's going to either build, or fit out the new domestically manufactured aircraft carrier," said Gary Li, a Beijing-based senior maritime analyst at consulting firm IHS.

"Some of the companies that are going to be the main buyers of the shares are all keen to have a stake in the new carrier project. Everything from batteries to catapults. It's a big task and the Chinese shipbuilding industry is going to need as many stakeholders and investors as it can get."

Shanghai-listed shares of China Shipbuilding, which had been suspended since May pending the announcement of the deal, jumped more than 10 percent on Wednesday morning. The company has a market value of $10.8 billion.

Military-related products account for 8.3 percent of China Shipbuilding's income, according to Hwabao Securities.

China currently has one aircraft carrier, the Liaoning, which was refitted from a Russian-made model. Considered by military experts to be decades behind U.S. technology, it was originally intended to serve as a floating casino but was turned to military use in the run-up to a power transition in 2012.

China has been at odds with some of its Southeast Asian neighbours over conflicting claims to strings of islets in the resource-rich South China Sea and Beijing now has the firepower to challenge these rivals.
($1 = 6.1200 Chinese yuan)
(Additional reporting by Samuel Shen and Kazunori Takada in SHANGHAI; Writing by Anne Marie Roantree; Editing by Chris Gallagher)

As expected the interruption of trading in CSIC shares since May was connected with the production of aircraft carriers, although this article still can't say which yard will build the next one.
Notice the price expected for each carrier fleet, $20b, nearly twice the value of the shipbuilding concern.
This financial change will likely also spur the export of naval vessels.
 
Last edited:

tphuang

Lieutenant General
Staff member
Super Moderator
VIP Professional
Registered Member
Found at
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!



As expected the interruption of trading in CSIC shares since May was connected with the production of aircraft carriers, although this article still can't say which yard will build the next one.
Notice the price expected for each carrier fleet, $20b, nearly twice the value of the shipbuilding concern.
This financial change will likely also spur the export of naval vessels.

that's just some "expert forecasts". Who knows what these experts are. I would take that with a grain of salt.
 

delft

Brigadier
that's just some "expert forecasts". Who knows what these experts are. I would take that with a grain of salt.
I do take it with a few grains of salt but the company has chosen these "experts" to cite in its posting on the web site of the Shanghai stock
exchange so it shouldn't be BS. Of course they are protected by the fact that the shares are sold to up to ten selected investors.
Or do you think they can be investing in something not connected with flattops?
 

tphuang

Lieutenant General
Staff member
Super Moderator
VIP Professional
Registered Member
I do take it with a few grains of salt but the company has chosen these "experts" to cite in its posting on the web site of the Shanghai stock
exchange so it shouldn't be BS. Of course they are protected by the fact that the shares are sold to up to ten selected investors.
Or do you think they can be investing in something not connected with flattops?

well, i'm sure it's connected to flat tops, but it's really hard to know exactly the cost when we don't know what a carrier fleet for PLAN consists of at this point and certainly only a limited portion of that will go to the shipbuilders, with the rest going to suppliers, contractors and AVIC1.
 

drunkmunky

Junior Member
That is a very important forecast.. Without privatization and sales to fund the Chinese Economy, I fear that the Chinese Military Complex could eventually fold like the Soviet example when economic downturn occurs.

I'm very happy about this, although, I'm concerned about the whole arms embargo...
 

latenlazy

Brigadier
That is a very important forecast.. Without privatization and sales to fund the Chinese Economy, I fear that the Chinese Military Complex could eventually fold like the Soviet example when economic downturn occurs.

I'm very happy about this, although, I'm concerned about the whole arms embargo...

Given how state centralized and concentrated capital is in China, and how different the Chinese and Soviet economic systems are, I'm somewhat doubtful that's a reasonable forecast.
 
Last edited:

Hendrik_2000

Lieutenant General
That is a very important forecast.. Without privatization and sales to fund the Chinese Economy, I fear that the Chinese Military Complex could eventually fold like the Soviet example when economic downturn occurs.

I'm very happy about this, although, I'm concerned about the whole arms embargo...

I doubt that China will suffer the same fate like Soviet Union since she limit the defense expenditure to 1-1/2 % of GDP the lowest rate of expenditure among the major power. No less than 6 or 7% of Government expenditure. At its height Soviet Union spend 50% of government expenditure(NOT GDP) for defense(capital cost, operation cost) .

But I share your thought that it is a major change in procurement policy. I am also glad that they now involve the private sector in defense procurement .It bode well for the future of Chinese defense industry.What arm embargo are talking the one now in place like ITAR

I hope they keep it as long as possible. Nothing spur the domestic defense technology more than embargo because they have no choice but to go it on their own.

Going back to Carrier, now that funding is settled, it just matter of time before they built the Carrier
 
Last edited:

danielchin

Junior Member
jufeng.jpg

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!


in this news video clip, the mentioned company "JuFeng" had provided the "insulation system" for catapult for the first indigenous Chinese carrier.
 
Last edited:

SinoSoldier

Colonel
View attachment 8309

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!


in this news video clip, the mentioned company "JuFeng" had provided the "insulation system" for catapult for the first indigenous Chinese carrier.

That could mean a couple of things:
- The Chinese have decided to go with a CATOBAR carrier (aka flattop), but why did the military insider say that it will be built at Dalian which produced the ramp proposal?
- this is another false flag video and it's for another vessel
 
Top