antiterror13
Brigadier
and who would believe (in 2000) China was able to build a supercomputer, let alone the fastest in the world?
Crazy fast progress. Another module was installed yesterday.
I don't know why some people find the idea of Chinese EMALs so improbable if they are being truly objective.
Given the fact that China has developed and commercially operated maglev train lines, which uses the same core technology as EMALs, the fact that China can and is development EMALs really should be surprising or mind boggling to anyone.
China being able to draw on that prior experience, work done and expertise developed from its civilian maglev train projects to speed up EMAL development again, is pretty much to be expected, compared to the US, which has never developed civilian maglev technology, which had to start from a much lower base when developing EMALs, compared to China.
All too often, I see western 'experts' and pundits apply an unreasonable, and almost arrogant 'Chinese tax' delay to their expectations of how long it will take China to do something, which could be roughly summaries as taking how long it took the west to do it, and then arbitrarily adding X number of years on top because the Chinese 'obviously' couldn't be expected to be as good as westerners at anything.
When the Chinese not only beats those baseless expectations, but often also the length of time the west took to make those breakthroughs in the first place, that is when all the 'inferior quality' and 'copying/stealing' allegations starts popping up.
That depended/depends on circumstances. It didn't happen that way when they invented gun powder and developed guns.It's unlikely because it does not fit the long standing Chinese approach to adoption of untried technology.
Traditionally, China has not accepted the unqualified risks associated with pursuing the position of defense technological leadership. Instead China has sought out technology which other major powers have already committed to and thus provided a track record for China to assess the risks.
China has no such tradition that you speak of. A good counter example is thermonuclear weapons. Another good one is ASBM. China adopted diverterless supersonic inlet the same time as America did. China already put large AESA radars on to naval ships when European navies just started playing with miniature AESA radars and USN was still using PESA radars.It's unlikely because it does not fit the long standing Chinese approach to adoption of untried technology.
Traditionally, China has not accepted the unqualified risks associated with pursuing the position of defense technological leadership. Instead China has sought out technology which other major powers have already committed to and thus provided a track record for China to assess the risks.
very wrong my friend. The military history says otherwise. It is only in the recent less than two hundred years that China is trailing behind other powers, not for the majority of the her history.It's unlikely because it does not fit the long standing Chinese approach to adoption of untried technology.
Traditionally, China has not accepted the unqualified risks associated with pursuing the position of defense technological leadership. Instead China has sought out technology which other major powers have already committed to and thus provided a track record for China to assess the risks.