Gordon Chang and Want China Times aren't credible original sources, can you list the ones you trust that didn't merely repeat the incident from another news agency?
The ship has four propellers, four or eight or so turbines, boilers ect. Damage to a part of the plant should stop no more than one propeller.Who mentioned 'Want China Times'?.........all my post says is that their was a problem with the engines, but it wasn't a show stopper, and yes some news agencies had exaggerated the story to make it look like there had been a major problem.
Actually, I have never heard rumors of Liaoning using any other type of engine except steam turbine besides some netizen's wish. After all , Liaoning is ex-varyag which use steam turbine, and China only want to reactivate/refurbish it.
The point of my message is for you to list your source, because there are some unreliable ones out there. So, what's your source of Liaoning engine failures that temporarily put the carrier out of action?Who mentioned 'Want China Times'?.........all my post says is that their was a problem with the engines, but it wasn't a show stopper, and yes some news agencies had exaggerated the story to make it look like there had been a major problem.
Everything I have heard to date indicates that it may be the same basic design...perhaps a little smaller, and certainly, based on what we have seen at Wuhan, a different sensor configuration matching what is on that mock-up now would be my guess.
