GreenestGDP
Junior Member
Yes thats a burke
Seems somewhere between 0500 and 0900 a clock.
But wich date and location? Haha
I believe the USN shadowing occurred just a few days ago around 28 or 29 DEC 2015.
Yes thats a burke
Seems somewhere between 0500 and 0900 a clock.
But wich date and location? Haha
The Akizuki class has a raked main mast and is probably a closer fit. They are very capable JMSDF destroyers...but are usually not operating alone like this.Wait does the Japanese navy havnt these masts that are so far angled back?
You do see the sun reflection in the aegis
When it comes to steel, China's steel industry is second to none. They are also the world's largest ship building nation followed by Korea and Japan by a long margin.
The whole reason the PLAN picked up the hull of the Varyag was for two reasons, the first major reason was that a pound of steel on the Varyag was about 2-3 times less expensive than the going market price for new steel of the same grade and secondly it was to study or more like reconfirm the Soviet structural designs of their carriers and they also bought the blue prints to the Varyag.
Officials Confirm Construction of First Domestic Chinese Aircraft Carrier
By:
January 4, 2016 4:30 PM
Undated photo of Chinese aircraft carrier Liaoning. PLA Photo
China is in the midst of building its first domestic carrier, Ministry of National Defense officials confirmed last week.
During a press conference, spokesman Col. Yang Yuju told reporters construction was underway.
“After taking into account a range of factors, the relevant authorities launched work on developing a second aircraft carrier, and we are now undertaking our own indigenous design and construction,” he said, .
“We have a long coastline and a broad maritime jurisdiction… Defending national maritime security, and safeguarding sovereignty over territorial seas and over maritime rights and interests, are sacred duties of China’s armed forces.”
Follow on reports from Chinese state-controlled press said the People’s Liberation Army Navy’s (PLAN) new carrier was to field its – an unlicensed copy of the Russian Sukhoi Su-33 Flanker – displace about 50,000 tons and retain the short take-off but arrested recovery (STOBAR) configuration of its Soviet-era carrier test platform – Liaoning.
The decisions the Chinese made in their new carrier point to a measured approach to the new ship – Type 001A.
“Compared with China’s first carrier… the second carrier will have more mature technology and performance, with better coordination between its systems,” wrote China’s state controlled Xinhua news wire.
From the information released by Chinese media, the carrier will be mostly similar to the Kusetnov-class template of Liaoning and absent a catapult launching system.
An undated photo of Chinese J-15 fighter in tests aboard Liaoning. PLAN Photo
“Future Chinese carriers will be fitted with catapults for fighter jets to take off on deck, but the process will be gradual since catapult take-off involves more complex technology,”.
The details of Type 001A around construction of a ship in a dry dock in China’s Dailan shipyard.
The construction of the ship resembled the builds of Soviet Kuznetsov-class carrier, reported Jane’s in September – a ship with a beam of 115 feet and a length of 866 feet.
Jane’s stopped short of declaring the ship the Type 001A but several experts confirmed to USNI News in September the ship was China’s first domestic carrier.
The unexpected confirmation of the Type 001A follows China’s irregular efforts of transparency in its military acquisition.
Ocean Development Report, China declared it would pursue development of its own domestic carrier program. It took six months for the detail to make it into the Western press.
, a Chinese party official declared construction of the first domestic aircraft carrier already underway with an eventual goal of four PLAN carriers but those comments were quickly scrubbed from state press.
A four-carrier force would mimic traditional carrier deployment patterns in which there are three carriers in maintenance or workups for every carrier deployed.
China does produce a lot of steel -- but much of it is bulk steel, but it still need to import a lot of specialty steel. Make specialty steel is not easy -- purity and impurities, thermal treatments (to get into the right phase and grain size), hot/cold working, etc. While China is making progress both on commercial and military applications, they are still behind.
Having steel is only the first step -- you have to figure out how to wield the steel, and it's not trivial. When China build the first 052, it took the risk of using a new steel that is in development. It took months to figure out how to correctly wield the steel. One reason Indians are so proud of their new steel for the carrier is that it can be wielded without special processes. They are making good progress, but don't take it out of proportion. China is also making progress, but you need to compare it to the tech leader to see how much more China need to catch up.
Do you get excited when you look a nice weld beads or even know what beads are ?
I do, cause I weld and I am trained as a spectrometer technologist. If you can weld the steel with a standard MIG(GMAW) or stick process then the steel is nothing special !
Make no mistake, the Liaoning is going to be capable of combat operations if ever called upon."We use the Liaoning to test the reliability and compatibility of systems on carriers, and to train personnel. The second carrier will mainly do what a genuine aircraft carrier is supposed to do: running combat patrols and delivering humanitarian aid."
The new carrier will distinguish itself from the Liaoning:
1. Designed to be combat operational
2. Modular construction
3. More advance power & propulsion, electronics and weapon systems than the Liaoning
China does produce a lot of steel -- but much of it is bulk steel, but it still need to import a lot of specialty steel. Make specialty steel is not easy -- purity and impurities, thermal treatments (to get into the right phase and grain size), hot/cold working, etc. While China is making progress both on commercial and military applications, they are still behind.