PLA (strategic) news, pics, and videos

nimitz123

New Member
Registered Member
Don't get me wrong but alone the PLAAF-Orbat listed on only 23 pages gives me the impression it is at best a rather rushy copy & paste action lazy and uninterestingly put together. My own PLAAF-Orbat book alone had 239 pages!
Could you publish your PLAAF-Orbat book please
 
Now both China and the United States have the ability to launch missiles to saturate surface ships at a long distance, and the future development direction is also more and more out-of-area attacks. So the survivability of surface ships will become worse and worse in the future

The problem is that the United States does not need to let the fleet enter the combat zone, and the United States can let the fleet hide far away. But China cannot let the fleet hide far away. If it wants to land in Taiwan, the fleet must enter the combat zone. This is a very difficult problem to solve

Another problem is that if China and the United States fire missiles at each other, China will suffer more. Because the United States can hit important coastal cities in China, while China can only hit American islands in the Pacific. These small islands are basically military bases and have little economic value. So the degree of loss on both sides is different

So even if the equipment level of China and the United States is the same, the United States still has an asymmetric advantage

Even amateur military enthusiasts understand the concept of tyranny of distance and the inverse relationship between distance and cost to project power. Way to go contradicting the last 300 years of military science.
 
Top