What about lasers?Compared to ORBATs, I am far more interested how upgrades can be done.
What about lasers?Compared to ORBATs, I am far more interested how upgrades can be done.
What about lasers?
It certainly would limit the eventual numbers of 055. How could it possibly not? By their very nature the 055X and 052X will share overlapping roles, namely long range (fleet) air defense (and of course antishipping and backup ASW as well), which when boiled down to its essence is a function of ship positioning and number of VL cells, both of which are mitigated by the presence of 052X ships in the PLAN ORBAT. The more 052X ships you have in the fleet the less 055X ships you will need. A 055X/054X fleet will have a significantly higher number of 055X ships than a fleet which contains a mix of 055X/052X/054X ships.I ask you what you meant by "fan estimations" of 055's eventual numbers, because my opinion of both the three class structure and the two class structure can exist where a large number of 055X weight class destroyers have been produced.
Putting it another way, I don't necessarily think a two class force structure will emerge, but I do think it will be likely that a large number of 055s will be eventually produced, and whether 052D/E production continues as well does not necessarily limit the eventual numbers of 055s that may be built.
An IEP setup by definition cannot be "CODAG", which refers to the particular transmission gearing that links the engines together. In the case of IEP all diesels and all GTs output power directly into the grid (via their alternators) and not into a transmission gearbox. In other words they are not connected to each other physically (thus no "CODAG") but rather indirectly via the shared electrical grid.I wonder if the 054B will go to a CODAG configuration with its IEP, discarding the previous CODAD. I also wonder if there will be GP and ASW speciality configurations for the 054B (YJ-12 equipped vs YU-10 equipped.)
I think it is important to keep in mind that it is not a given that the 052C or 052D has the ability to increase generator output enough to use GaN-based radars. The other upgrades you mentioned are nice to have but surely massively expensive, and of course some will have significantly higher power requirements, which again may or may not be possible. IMO missile upgrades are the most likely to be seen when these ships enter their midlife overhaul, with some minor radar upgrades. BTW there is no reason to substitute 4 YJ-12s or YJ-18s for 8 YJ-83s just because this is what you see on the 051B. The deck area where the YJ-83 slant launchers are located have plenty of room for larger slant launchers. If we do end up seeing this arrangement it is more likely related to cost limitations rather than space limitations.Type 052C ---
Replace Type 346 panels to the Type 346B standard using GaN.
Type 730s changed to one Type 1130 and one HQ-10 24 cell launcher.
YJ-62 missiles retired, replaced by YJ-12.
VLS retained. Earlier version of HQ-9 retired and replaced by later versions with active guidance. I may eliminate the C band array for target illumination for more S-band elements for greater search and tracking, and I suspect is the version used for the carriers.
Back end, transmitter and receiver upgrades to the Type 364, 344, 366 and 517 radars. Or conversion of Type 344 and 366 radars to a combined AESA X-band unit and Type 364 to a rotating scan digital phase array C-band unit, preferably AESA.
Type 054A ---
Back end, transmitter and receiver upgrades to the Type 364, 344, 366 and 382 radars. Or conversion of Type 344 and 366 radars to a combined AESA X-band unit, Type 364 replaced with a rotating scan AESA C band unit, and Type 382 to an S-band AESA, using two rotating Type 346 panels.
H/AJK-16 VLS retained. HQ-16 retired, replaced by a new version of HQ-16 with active guidance, and quad pack of DK-10 also with active guidance.
YJ-83s replaced by either four YJ-12s or eight Yu-10s in an ASW configuration.
MR-90 radars used for target illumination replaced by four X-band fire control radars, with active elements. The locations of the MR90s appear to give the best radar coverage around the ship to deal with a multiple axis saturation attack. Instead of target illumination, these radars work mainly on track while scan modes to track multiple objects and provide high quality tracks on targets all around the ship, which the data is fed via data link to the missiles. The basis for the arrays can be those used for the J-11D such as shown below.
It certainly would limit the eventual numbers of 055. How could it possibly not? By their very nature the 055X and 052X will share overlapping roles, namely long range (fleet) air defense (and of course antishipping and backup ASW as well), which when boiled down to its essence is a function of ship positioning and number of VL cells, both of which are mitigated by the presence of 052X ships in the PLAN ORBAT. The more 052X ships you have in the fleet the less 055X ships you will need. A 055X/054X fleet will have a significantly higher number of 055X ships than a fleet which contains a mix of 055X/052X/054X ships.
It certainly sounds like you're saying here that 052Xs would limit 055 production. "A lot + even more" is certainly more than "a lot", the only difference between the two being the presence of 052Xs. In other words the presence of 052Xs limits the number of 055Xs that would otherwise have been built had 052Xs stopped being built. While it is certainly fine to claim that 055X numbers will be large in either fleet structure, this is NOT the same as claiming that 055 numbers would not be limited by ongoing 052X production, because it most certainly would.So when I say I think a three tier fleet will not put a "limit" on the 055Xs built versus a two tier fleet, what I'm saying is that the 055Xs built in the three tier fleet can be "a lot" but the two tier fleet wouod then be "a lot + even more".
It certainly sounds like you're saying here that 052Xs would limit 055 production. "A lot + even more" is certainly more than "a lot", the only difference between the two being the presence of 052Xs. In other words the presence of 052Xs limits the number of 055Xs that would otherwise have been built had 052Xs stopped being built. While it is certainly fine to claim that 055X numbers will be large in either fleet structure, this is NOT the same as claiming that 055 numbers would not be limited by ongoing 052X production, because it most certainly would.
Look, I don't know what lit a fire under your butt here. Clearly my reference to "many fans' projections" were in reference to those who believed that the PLAN would move to a two-tier navy, in which case those specific fans' projections about 055 numbers would have to be "tempered". And they in fact would. And this is something you more or less agreed with. So what are you arguing about, exactly? Are you trying to claim that I was saying that ALL fans' projections of the 055 would have to be lessened, including my own? Since I and others have believed that the PLAN would in fact preserve a three-tier navy, our projections aren't lessened at all, but have always been made with the presence of the 052X in mind. If YOU personally believed that 055 numbers will be "25-30" with continued 052X production, good on you. Guess what? Your projections have no relevance to what I said. My own projections have no relevance to what I said. I wasn't talking about you, me, or anyone else who believes a three-tier PLAN ORBAT will exist going forward. If you are trying to claim that I was, then directly quote and link what I said, don't paraphrase like you are doing here.